reply to post by ProudBird
Chemtrails are not a hoax. Correction, not ALL accounts are a hoax.
I've never heard of the guy who wrote the linked story, so i'm not counting what he says, nor am i discounting it, so it has nothing to do with my
knowledge, based on evidence from my own observations over the years, based on video testimony from US Air force, back in the 1990's admitting the so
called 'Chemtrail' phenomena was a real programme, albeit instituted (supposedly) as a form of weather research, later denied in favour of radar
There's so many different excuses from authoritative bodies concerning the true and exact nature and reasons for spraying of micron sized
particulates, that the whole topic reeks to high heaven of a cover up.
Not too dissimilar to the Roswell series of different excuses put out to cover up what was going on back there in 1947, crashed ET UFO, or black
budget experimentation of a home grown UFO it doesn't matter...the series of three or four different excuses tells us a lot more than the BS ever
does. Namely, that someone is authorising repeated lies as an explanation.
The same is going on with Chemtrails.
I mean, it's not like we're talking about UFO's or Santa Claus here folks, one only has to look up after these aircraft (whoever and wherever they
are based) have gone overhead and see for yourself!
The texture of the resultant chemtrail, the spread pattern it leaves, the extreme persistence of the chemtrail, the way multiple trails 'bleed'
together to form a canopy that persists for hours in some cases, and so on.
These are not to be confused with the ordinary, relatively short lived, completely different looking 'contrails' that everyone is aware of, that are
created when a sufficient temperature differential is present. Yes, there are occasionally what are known as 'persistent contrails created by
aircraft, where normal condensation trails are hanging around longer than would be expected, but the phenomena people recognise as chemtrails, is very
different in it's appearance and duration, even when compared to normal and perfectly innocent 'persistent contrails'.
It's a 'you know it is very different when you see it' kind of deal.
I don't know what the purpose of spraying particulates is, i don't know the composition of the spray, i don't know what equipment is being used,
although i suspect it is the patented aerial spraying nozzles mentioned in a patent that was floating around in connection to chemtrails, but it could
be something else entirely.
I suspect that whatever the reason, whatever the chemical composition of the particulates, whether nano particulates or not, that the intention is not
to cause harm to people below, or wildlife or plant life, but some other motive we are being made privy to.
I can speculate though. My hypothesis range from the incredible to the mundane, and it really comes down to a gut instinct without further evidence or
testimony from those involved.
With the greatest respect, i realise you do not think there's anything to the chemtrail phenomena, it doesn't matter to me, or indeed matter to the
reality or otherwise of the programme if you happen to agree or disagree that 'something' other than water vapour (and maybe a little added unburned
fuel) is being made into an aerosol and deliberately sprayed over populated areas.
It has been seen, photographed and filmed by people from all over Earth's populated areas. Some of these will undoubtedly be incorrectly
misidentified and perfectly normal 'persistent contrails', likewise some will be deliberately faked for reasons best known to the fakers, but most
you'll find are of this 'twice officially explained' phenomena.
And i am old enough to remember contrails from throughout the 1970's and 80's, and what is being described as 'chemtrails' were NOT around in our
skies then. This is something that has been going on since around the early to mid 1990's, exactly the same time period as when the US air force
described 'weather modification and seeding experiments'.