On this occasion I'll not bother thanks. I simply get frustrated when I see sources used that have been repeatedly proven wrong.
For someone like me, the methods used on here by people to show that there is something to this particular conspiracy are all wrong. So, as a general
letting off of steam which you may wish to skip its not a direct response to your question, here goes.
Pictures of contrails, declared to be chemtrails for no reason at all might convince a simpleton, but an enquiring mind wants more.
Once a particular source has been shown to have lied or demonstrated a basic lack of understanding, their appearance in support of chemtrailing is
just irritating clutter on the board. An example of this would be Alex Jones slavering rant on chemtrails posted in a video on here in another thread
in which he declares that contrails don't persist, a basic error that undercuts everything that follows. Then you get the same error declared on here
as I f it's a fact and the whole temperature-plus-relative-humidity explanation HAS to be written all over again for the 50th time, which is fair
enough if the member in question hasn't seen it, but then occasionally the member it was written for the benefit of will call it a lie, based on
nothing other than what AJ said. It's all so circular! However, even more grating is when another member that you strongly suspect has seen ALL 50
previous posts responds as if it's the first time they've seen it or even asks a direct question a few posts later as if the scientific explanation
had never been given before!
While I'm letting off steam something else that pisses me off is when, not only do members on the pro side of the argument call other members trolls,
shills, disinfo agents etc, they THEN have the gall to say that the debunkers are being rude in their replies! Oh, boo hoo.
Something I've witnessed A LOT, directly to myself and already to another member today, is when direct questions related to something that the pro
chemtrailer has written are either ignored completely, or sidestepped with accusations of not having read a previous, and sometimes non existent
reply. That these can then be the same members who repeatedly ask the same questions about contrail formation is just icing on the cake.
Possibly the most pathetic and infantile line of all is taken by those who, having been shown that what they hold to be evidence is nothing of the
sort, label people as stupid deniers or govt agents working as part of a cover up - NO, IDIOT, IF THERE IS EVIDENCE OF CHEMTRAILING WE WANT TO SEE IT.
BUT WE WANT IT TO BE REAL, NOT YOUR MADE UP FANTASY/PERSONAL PARANOIA.
It's becoming very tiresome trying to find genuine evidence or having a debate with people who repeatedly demonstrate themselves to be ignorant
Should anyone on here think this is directed at them personally, then if you recognise that you have deliberately done any of the things I mentioned,
it is. Then ask yourself, are you on here to find/discuss truth, or to spam the board with preconception and annoy other people? If its the latter,
then YOU are the troll.
edit on 15-12-2011 by waynos because: (no reason given)