Originally posted by purplemer
Pope: Pedophilia Was "Fully In Conformity With Man And Even With Children"
thenewcivi
lrightsmovement.com
In an end-of-year, shocking Christmas statement to Cardinals and other Vatican officials, Pope Benedict XVI said, “In the 1970s,
paedophilia was theorised as something fully in conformity with man and even with children,” and added that paedophilia wasn’t even considered an
“absolute evil,” according to a report in the Belfast Telegraph.
“Pope Benedict XVI also claimed that child pornography was increasingly considered “normal” by society.
(visit the link for the full
news article)
I want to reply to this, but NOT from my personal standpoint. I want to pose to everyone that we only have a current standard of "acceptable"
behavior because someone before us made it so. Even in the Bible, there is nothing against what we call pedophilia. Do I think it's sick? Sure,
but only because our children are developing emotional and mentally MUCH later than children from 100 years ago and even further, and ONLY if the act
is generated outside the confounds of love. But to play the Devil's advocate for a moment, who originally defined that it was wrong? The same goes
for Catholic clergy....who defined that they must be celibate? Not God and certainly not the Bible! The only reason why I bring up the Bible is
because our laws were formed on the moral codes set within it...that is the basis of our morality, regardless of what anyone may or may not believe.
If we want to be technical, polygamy AND pedophilia existed in biblical times....Joseph was in his 40's when he married a 13 year-old Mary, for
God's sake! In the middle east, marriages would occur with little girls far younger than that, to men much older. As I understand it, there is a
courtesy to the families of the children that consummation of the marriage will not take place until the girl has reach maturity - usually at the time
when her menstrual cycle starts. Like it or not, this is when sexual maturity has arrived. Only in modern times and in industrialized nations have
we redefined what is acceptable and what isn't.
So all I'm saying is...200 years ago, or even 100 years ago, we would not be scoffing at this quite so much, because our opinions and cultural
standards were a lot different. Back then, a 10 year old girl could run the entire house and farm on her own, and had the maturity of a 25 year old
woman of today. A boy her age had more responsibility than most young men of today in their 20's or even 30's. They reached emotional and mental
maturity twice or even three times as fast (in some cases) as the generations of today.
To further this notion, and to make a point...the only reason we scoff at incest is because of the issues with genetic deformities. THIS is the bottom
line. A thousand years ago, or two thousand years ago, brothers, sisters, and parents would procreate to ensure their genetic line. There was no
psychologist waiting outside the tent to deal with the "therapy" needed because a daughter got pregnant by her father. Is it gross by our
standards? Yes. But I'm just making the point that back then, standards were different. It's all relevant to what we find acceptable in our
times, by someone who defines what is right and what is wrong.
Given that times are always changing, where will it be in another 100 years or two? What will be considered right and what will be considered wrong?
Just something to think about....