United Nations to Regulate the Internet?, page 1
Pages:
ATS Members have flagged this thread 8 times
Topic started on 10-11-2011 @ 10:10 PM by MitchL61

United Nations to Regulate the Internet?


politics.blogs.foxnews.com

FCC Commissioner Robert McDowell suggests that is a real possibility. Chris Stirewalt and the Commissioner discussed the subject today on Power Play Live.

Read more: politics.blogs.foxnews.com...
(visit the link for the full news article)

Mod Edit: Comprehensive 'Breaking Alternative News' Forum Posting Guidelines – Please Review This Link.
edit on 1/13/2012 by Mirthful Me because: (no reason given)



reply posted on 10-11-2011 @ 11:33 PM by picratus
reply to post by 1AnunnakiBastard


they have been do it for a long time already ,get kapersky and load it up come here and type in jfk assassination and their tie in,jfk said they were a national disgrace 2 weeks before his untimely death. and the little box on the bottom left pops up and say the cia is hacking your computer -- allow or disallow.they already did it to me.
freedom of speech no all freedoms will disappear -why are they building all of these new super jails here in canada and the us ,how about the rest of you ,as they say it is for the criminal element and yet they are all passing these new laws saying speak your piece against them and go to jail directly for 30 days with no charges and no phone calls.
RIGHTS FREEDOMS they are already gone and we the people of the world let them away with this . as they never said a word until after the fact and most people are worried about everything else .
it seems the knife is their favorite weapon,,, backs getting sore yet people.


reply posted on 11-11-2011 @ 12:17 AM by bigfatfurrytexan
reply to post by picratus


OK, i use Kaspersky. I copied this text string from your prior post:

jfk assassination and their tie in,jfk said they were a national disgrace 2 weeks before his untimely death


pasted into search on ATS, and all I got was:




powered by

Custom Search
Web
(0)




No Results


Meanwhile, in my system tray, Kaspersky just sat there twiddling his thumbs and thinking about making the viruses in quarantine play gladiator again.


reply posted on 11-11-2011 @ 12:17 AM by Xcathdra
reply to post by MitchL61


Its both a good and bad idea. I would like to see some of the finer details worked out, specifically what would be allowed and what would be censored. What about media broadcasting that usues both non biased as well as opinion based?

What about religious websites? NeoNazi websites? Communist, Democratic etc websites. Just because we dont agree with capitalism or communism or New Nazi doesnt mean they should be censored. That alone would fly in the face of some fundamental laws in the US.

Which is the next issue, allowing an outside entity with no direct accountability to the people of the US or other countries for that matter, making decisions for the whole.

If this occurs without those basic questions being asked, arent we setting up he precedent to allow the UN a little more control of other areas? I know the UNhas been hot on pushing for complete weapon bans / sales when it comes to civilians owning them.

To me this is a slippery slope issue waiting to happen. As I said, im not completely against it, but I want to see the fine print before this goes anywhere.

The UN is not a democratic entity and it does not have independant oversight. We do not get to vote for our UN reps, nor are we able to hold them accountible, let alone fire them if they chose to act in an interest that runs counter to the US Constitution and will of the people.


reply posted on 11-11-2011 @ 10:44 AM by MitchL61

Its both a good and bad idea. I would like to see some of the finer details worked out, specifically what would be allowed and what would be censored. What about media broadcasting that usues both non biased as well as opinion based?
reply to post by Xcathdra


Good comment. I agree with you. I don't think all the proposed ideas are bad, I am however, opposed to the United Nations being the overseeing body. I would prefer it be an elected body. But, I'm with you as far as we would need to iron out all the specifics.


reply posted on 11-11-2011 @ 03:03 PM by redrose123
reply to post by MitchL61


The UN is a joke and a diaster. They are nothing but of overpaid psycopaths leeching off the entire planet. Now they want to watch me take a shower or what goes on in my bedroom among other things. Why in the world are the people paying money that they work for to support this criminal buncg?


reply posted on 13-1-2012 @ 01:07 PM by picratus
reply to post by MitchL61


i have a few questions for all here .
pass them on.
why should they be allowed to censer the net?
where is the freedom of speech in this?
is this another way of controlling the populace world wide?
is this a way to silence those who do not agree with them-those who think outside of the box?
is the voices of the people`s discontent being chocked off so that they can continue to control this our world with an unseen iron fist?

and we wonder why they have meetings behind closed doors,considering that they are supposed to work for us as we pay their wages?
any one else want to contribute to this small list.please feel free to do so ,and start talking globally not just in your own countries as we are seeing their forceful oppression taking place in other nations whose people are disgusted with the mindless mind set of the governments and the corrupt banking system of the world.


reply posted on 13-1-2012 @ 01:22 PM by picratus
reply to post by eyespying

the news networks ,what a joke they are .in all reality they are nothing more than propaganda puppets for the governments ,banks and all the rest of them,as gw bush said the unholy trinity.i say take a look at themselves ,cause they all smell like a kettle of bad fish. phew.
Pages:     ^^TOP^^