reply to post by HunkaHunka
As far as I could follow the rather biased reporting, it seems to me the intent was to head off attempts to define protected classes in this and
future legislation. As a female and a minority I am all for that. I believe the heterosexual Anglo Saxon white male deserves just as much protection
from assault and threats and harassment as I do. ALL forms of bullying have no place anywhere at any time for any reason. And I would hope that our
existing laws against assault and harassment and slander and defamation would be sufficient to cover these incidents. And for the cases that might
fall between the legal cracks, schools can and should impose rules of student conduct and vigorously enforce them.
Where I have a problem with all these protected classes oriented legislation is that they create, rather than erase inequities. They will punish
people for being born into what was once a traditionally empowered race, religion and gender.
As for that questionable proviso that allegedly permits bullying for religious reasons, I think the intent behind it was to protect the status quo, in
which we have a certain level of free speech in the USA that has been severely eroded in the U.K. I don't live in the UK so I admit I could be utterly
wrong but from my reading I gather that in some instances Muslims are being elevated to a highly protected class above Christians or Atheists or
Agnostics who speak out with grievances against Muslims and are then branded and arrested for "hate speech".
I'm not saying this legislation is the right way to fulfill that intent. I think that it is trying to head in that direction.
I've been a victim of bullying for my race and my small stature, myself. Even coming from that perspective I don't think more legislation is the
answer. I think better communication with victims, informing of their rights and remedies under existing laws and regulation, coupled with a more
effective response by authorities, is the way to go. Again this is only my humble opinion. I seek no contentious arguments with anyone here.
edit on 10-11-2011 by SheeplFlavoredAgain because: Fixing grammar errors.