We had a poll up from our Republican Presidential Debate asking readers who they thought won. One candidate was leading by such a margin that it became obvious the polling wasn't so much a reading of our audience, but of the Internet prowess of this particular candidate's political organization. We have therefore taken the poll down.
Originally posted by TrueAmericanAll us Ron Paulers should just go settle out in the middle of nowhere somewhere and make our own country.
Originally posted by cdnutz44
It's a shame that MSM can't at least give him credit when it is due.
Originally posted by Zanti Misfit
reply to post by 27jd
Well , isn't that a " Sign " that as a Presidential Candidate , he has a lot of Public Support ? Not All of those Poll Votes came from Avid Paul Followers , I bet most were from average People that just happen to Agree with the Ideas about Government he is putting out there . Most People respect a Person who has Age and Wisdom , and Ron Paul fits that bill to a tee......
Ron Paul is 'cheating' because his supporters are organized and enthusiastic...
You guys are good. Real good. You are truly a force on World Wide Web and I tip my hat to you.
That's based on my first hand experience of your work regarding our CNBC Republican candidate debate. After the debate, we put up a poll on our Web site asking who readers thought won the debate. You guys flooded it.
Now these Internet polls are admittedly unscientific and subject to hacking. In the end, they are really just a way to engage the reader and take a quick temperature reading of your audience. Nothing more and nothing less. The cyber equivalent of asking the room for a show of hands on a certain question.
So there was our after-debate poll. The numbers grew ... 7,000-plus votes after a couple of hours ... and Ron Paul was at 75%.
Now Paul is a fine gentleman with some substantial backing and, by the way, was a dynamic presence throughout the debate, but I haven't seen him pull those kind of numbers in any "legit" poll. Our poll was either hacked or the target of a campaign. So we took the poll down.
The next day, our email basket was flooded with Ron Paul support messages. And the computer logs showed the poll had been hit with traffic from Ron Paul chat sites. I learned other Internet polls that night had been hit in similar fashion. Congratulations. You folks are obviously well-organized and feel strongly about your candidate and I can't help but admire that.
But you also ruined the purpose of the poll. It was no longer an honest "show of hands" -- it suddenly was a platform for beating the Ron Paul drum. That certainly wasn't our intention and certainly doesn't serve our readers ... at least those who aren't already in the Ron Paul camp.
Some of you Ron Paul fans take issue with my decision to take the poll down. Fine. When a well-organized and committed "few" can throw the results of a system meant to reflect the sentiments of "the many," I get a little worried. I'd take it down again.
Managing Editor, CNBC.com
Connect to 220.127.116.11 on port 80 ... ok
GET / HTTP/1.1[CRLF]
User-Agent: Web-sniffer/1.0.37 (+web-sniffer.net...)[CRLF]