It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

CNBC Republican Debate from Michigan 8pm 11/9/2011 Livestream

page: 5
10
<< 2  3  4    6 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Nov, 9 2011 @ 08:42 PM
link   
Romney would run to the World Trade Organization to take care of China? in regards to trade?

laughable... IMO..



posted on Nov, 9 2011 @ 08:42 PM
link   

Originally posted by Wookiep
Yikes, Cain, bad move there. You can't answer EVERY question with "which is why I have a plan called NINE NINE NINE". Even the crowd is sick of it.


Oh, yes nine nine nine is getting played out..

I'm pulling for him right now because the smear campaign
they are committing against him..



posted on Nov, 9 2011 @ 08:44 PM
link   

Originally posted by JacKatMtn
Romney would run to the World Trade Organization to take care of China? in regards to trade?

laughable... IMO..



I agree with that,
we have to do something about China and the currency manipulation.

Romney going crying to the WTO I doubt
would help do a damn thing..



posted on Nov, 9 2011 @ 08:45 PM
link   
Clueless DC...

Counterfeit Chinese computer stuff? this is supposedly new?

Not here on ATS...

2008

www.abovetopsecret.com...


:shk:



edit on Wed, 09 Nov 2011 20:45:19 -0600 by JacKatMtn because: (no reason given)



posted on Nov, 9 2011 @ 08:45 PM
link   
Cramer is back!!


He is like a googly eyed bobble head!!



posted on Nov, 9 2011 @ 08:49 PM
link   
man that bald guy needs some xanex...


I'm so sick of Cain's answers, when he was asked about safe investment for the 'little guy' all I could think about was his tenure at Aquila where they manipulated stock, screwed the employees and the execs made out in 30+ million in bonuses.



posted on Nov, 9 2011 @ 08:50 PM
link   
One thing that I want to hear.. and haven't so far in the debates..

is the reinstatement of the provisions of the Glass-Steagall act that were trashed in 1999... by Clinton (DEM) singing a (REP) authored bill...


only took Wall Street less than ten years to put the nation back into Depression status, after those post Depression era clamps were put in place on the same folks on Wall Street..

it worked for 65+ years.. why not reinstate them?



edit on Wed, 09 Nov 2011 20:53:05 -0600 by JacKatMtn because: clarity



posted on Nov, 9 2011 @ 08:51 PM
link   
Well its over,

WHO WON in your EYES???



posted on Nov, 9 2011 @ 08:52 PM
link   
Nice lively debate....

No clear winner IMO..

but some just need to give up the ghost... AKA Bachmann, Santorum & Huntsmann.. IMO...



posted on Nov, 9 2011 @ 08:53 PM
link   
reply to post by JacKatMtn
 


Don't forget Perry.
Otherwise, I agree.



posted on Nov, 9 2011 @ 08:55 PM
link   
reply to post by Wookiep
 


He's got TOO much $$$ to bail... but I agree, he should go back to Texas..



posted on Nov, 9 2011 @ 08:55 PM
link   

Originally posted by JacKatMtn
Nice lively debate....

No clear winner IMO..

but some just need to give up the ghost... AKA Bachmann, Santorum & Huntsmann.. IMO...


I can go with that, I really could not call a winner.

I think Perry lost though, he was the clear looser in the debate to me.

Paul did good on his economic questions I like the END THE FED
a little too much at a time though..



posted on Nov, 9 2011 @ 08:57 PM
link   
I honestly get pissed when people try to demonize China for our woes, SERIOUSLY?

The only ones that are worthy of being president are the ones that are willing to see our own faults and willing to root it out with zero hesitation.


Placing blame on our competitors does NOTHING for our own progress, absolutely nothing.



posted on Nov, 9 2011 @ 09:05 PM
link   
reply to post by eLPresidente
 


The policies put in place by the US government, to include taxation & trade agreements, has forced US companies to send jobs to China and many other countries to be able to produce a product that can compete with those same nations' products..

All of the move towards a global trade, has put the US companies at a disadvantage...

It's unfair, the gov't used to protect US trade, now they are in the business of furthering the global trade at the expense of many US businesses..

China is an easy target, but as far as I am concerned this is the result of an global agenda that has worked it's way DEEP into the fabric of the US government...



posted on Nov, 9 2011 @ 09:19 PM
link   
OMG, the Ron Paul Bees are already slamming the poll!
Paul: 66%
Newt: 12%
Cain: 9%
Romney: 7%
huntsman:3%
Perry: 2%
Bachman & Santorum: 1%



posted on Nov, 9 2011 @ 09:22 PM
link   
Not sure if it was just me but

I was watching the post coverage on CNBC and they went to a clip about when the Moderator asked cain about character, and the boo's were removed...yet when he answered there was still and audible applause from the crowd.



posted on Nov, 9 2011 @ 09:22 PM
link   

Originally posted by maddog99
OMG, the Ron Paul Bees are already slamming the poll!
Paul: 66%
Newt: 12%
Cain: 9%
Romney: 7%
huntsman:3%
Perry: 2%
Bachman & Santorum: 1%


I like Paul but it is true the online polls do get slammed
from his HUGE online following.



posted on Nov, 9 2011 @ 09:27 PM
link   
reply to post by popsmayhem
 

I somewhat agree but on the other hand, if the other candidates were as popular as the national polls dictate, why don't their supporters vote in these polls?



posted on Nov, 9 2011 @ 09:27 PM
link   
reply to post by maddog99
 


Lol nice O'reilly terminology there. I wonder if the O'reilly FB "slam" is still going on.



posted on Nov, 9 2011 @ 09:37 PM
link   
reply to post by Wookiep
 


I'm glad someone caught my sarcasm!

Yea, I think good ole Bill is really gonna hate us now!



new topics

top topics



 
10
<< 2  3  4    6 >>

log in

join