Washington State Privatizes Liquor Sales. Win?, page 2
Pages: <<  1    2  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 4 times


reply posted on 10-11-2011 @ 01:30 PM by dagobert
Originally posted by liquidsmoke206
reply to
post by dagobert





If you have never been into a state liquor store here in Washington let me just say that they are DEPRESSING. No music, very little chatter, no decor. It is obvious that the state does NOT want you to enjoy your booze.


So true. Most state stores, with the possible exception of the one in Langley on Whidbey Island, have a very communist feel to them. That's what happens when you have stuff thats state run. But I dont expect this new system to do anybody any real good.


I live in Crown Hill and so the closest liquor store is the one on 92nd and Greenwood. It's a VERY depressing store and they tend to ID very judiciously. The funny part is that they are in the same complex as a ratty little convenience store that seems to sell beer and wine to anyone who is ambulatory.


reply posted on 10-11-2011 @ 01:40 PM by liquidsmoke206
reply to post by dagobert



Wow, we live VERY close by. I should tell you though that there is a Crown Hill store and it's actually one of the best liquor stores in the city. It's not big but it's known by better bars all over Seattle as stocking good liquor. The lady who runs it is actually friendly and knowledgeable, something you generally never see at a state run anything...

Oh yeah, it's on 15th somewhere. Go check it out.



reply posted on 10-11-2011 @ 03:33 PM by dagobert
reply to post by liquidsmoke206



Yeah, I noticed you talking about the Park Pub on another thread a few months ago. Never been in there but do go to some nearby places from time to time. I'll check out the store on 15th... have been by it but never been in.


reply posted on 11-11-2011 @ 03:41 PM by justinsweatt
Originally posted by schuyler
Originally posted by justinsweatt
Welcome to another example of the Government not engaging in free market capitalism and producing a bill that not only price fixes but then taxes the hell out of you in the process. I'm sure they give property tax breaks to Cost Co in Washington as well so you're probably losing tax revenue for the state while big box stores like Cost Co reap the profits. In my opinion that's just stupid.


As much as I am unhappy with Costco's behavior here, they do not get property tax breaks. You are wrong. The bill does not "price fix." Indeed, the opposite is true. The state monopoloy on hard liquor was, in essence, price fixing, and that has now gone away. You're wrong there, too. The state is not losing money on the deal. Its revenues will be up slightly. Wrong yet again. Making up "facts" to then criticize like this doesn't help anyone. In my opinion that's just stupid.


Thanks for your response. I would be very surprised if the state of Washington didn't give tax breaks to CostCo. The bill does price fix, in my opinion, if you set parameters that will only allow for companies of CostCo's size to sell in a building that the state has set as a defined space. That, in my opinion, is price fixing. Imagine the Tax Revenue and jobs created if they allowed everyone, no matter what the size of the building or space, to sell liquor. That's all I was saying. Didn't the bill also levy a huge sin tax in the deal as well?


reply posted on 11-11-2011 @ 04:31 PM by liquidsmoke206
reply to post by The Old American



No thats just the thing I don't like about it. Competition WON'T thrive because this pretty much just allows big corporations to sell. There won't be any little guys, it does nothing for small business.


reply posted on 11-11-2011 @ 05:21 PM by schuyler
Originally posted by justinsweatt
Originally posted by schuyler
Originally posted by justinsweatt
Welcome to another example of the Government not engaging in free market capitalism and producing a bill that not only price fixes but then taxes the hell out of you in the process. I'm sure they give property tax breaks to Cost Co in Washington as well so you're probably losing tax revenue for the state while big box stores like Cost Co reap the profits. In my opinion that's just stupid.


As much as I am unhappy with Costco's behavior here, they do not get property tax breaks. You are wrong. The bill does not "price fix." Indeed, the opposite is true. The state monopoloy on hard liquor was, in essence, price fixing, and that has now gone away. You're wrong there, too. The state is not losing money on the deal. Its revenues will be up slightly. Wrong yet again. Making up "facts" to then criticize like this doesn't help anyone. In my opinion that's just stupid.


Thanks for your response. I would be very surprised if the state of Washington didn't give tax breaks to CostCo. The bill does price fix, in my opinion, if you set parameters that will only allow for companies of CostCo's size to sell in a building that the state has set as a defined space. That, in my opinion, is price fixing. Imagine the Tax Revenue and jobs created if they allowed everyone, no matter what the size of the building or space, to sell liquor. That's all I was saying. Didn't the bill also levy a huge sin tax in the deal as well?


You specifically said "property tax breaks" in your original. I don't know if there are any other kinds of breaks they get, but if there are, you need to cite them specifically. Imagining they exist is not logical.

Price fixing is when the price of a commodity is fixed at a given price no matter where you go. That is exactly the case in the state liquor stores now. Every single one sells Brand X at Price Y. With the new law that will no longer be the case. The law DOES limit by size, basically to not allow convenience stores to sell hard liquor. But everything from Trader Joe's (a smallish botique grocery store chain) to Wally World will be able to sell. The cut off is 10,000 square feet, about twice your typical convenience store size. Further, there is an exemption for small stores when there are no larger ones around. I guarantee you there will be vastly different pricing in these stores. That is not price fixing.

Yes, there are extra taxes and fees,
some of which is explained here, which will result in more revenue to the state than before. The fact is, though, that the $5.99 bottle of wine in the liquor store today will go away, leaving the grocery store across the street to sell the same bottle for $10.99. I don't understand how anyone can claim that is a good deal for the consumer.


reply posted on 12-11-2011 @ 02:00 PM by liquidsmoke206
reply to post by WarJohn



Thanks for your closed minded morality.

If you stop and think though, there's every indication that world does currently NEED these types of drinks in order to function morally.

What the world doesn't need is for governments and corporations to work together to screw over citizens and small businesses. That's truly immoral.


reply posted on 16-11-2011 @ 02:16 PM by liquidsmoke206
reply to post by dagobert





Washington state is the exact same. Theoretically a bar can be fined and/or lose their liquor license if they sell alcohol that was purchased from a store other than their assigned one. And god forbid if you simply run out of a bottle of something and send an employee to a store to pick it up.



Thats not entirely true, it's pretty common practice for bars to go all over the city to find the products they need. Stores that you're not assigned to will still sell to you and still give you your discount most of the time. However they will limit the amount of bottles you can purchase and before the vote happened there were rumors that they were about to get much more strict on this policy. What they will fine bars for is carrying bottles not authorized by the state. This means if you go to Canada or Oregon and get something that WA doesn't have so you can sell it in your bar then you're breaking the law! This has been a huge issue considering the resurgence of craft cocktail bars in the past ten or so years. The most acclaimed, well known cocktail bars in the city pretty much ALL have bottles they aren't supposed to because they better than the state understand how to please their patrons. A perfect real world example of how the market is much better at pushing the economy and serving the people then the state ever could be.


reply posted on 18-11-2011 @ 09:28 AM by JIMC5499
reply to post by liquidsmoke206



A few years ago, we would have bought what we needed from the "State Store" that had it. Now the Liquor Control Board (LCB) has increased the number of audits. I find it funny that the increase in audits started at the same time that Pennsylvania legalized gambling. Our club has a Small Games of Chance license. This license is enforced and regulated by the LCB. If you have a liquor violation, your Small Games of Chance license is suspended along with your liquor license. When your liquor license suspension is lifted, you have to re-apply for your Small Games of Chance license. Many times your application is rejected.
Pages: <<  1    2  >>    ^^TOP^^



People are marching in the streets all over Quebec
  Posted 4 days ago with 72 member flags
Breaking: Ron Paul to end active campaigning - cnn
  Posted 15 days ago with 26 member flags
Anon has released 1.7 GB of files....
  Posted 7 days ago with 24 member flags
Police Tasings Might Finally Be Ruled Brutality
  Posted 13 days ago with 23 member flags
US judge blocks indefinite detention of Americans
  Posted 13 days ago with 21 member flags
Ron Paul, Adam Smith Push To End Indefinite Detention Of Americans
  Posted 13 days ago with 20 member flags
The Vetting Breitbart - Obama : Born in Kenya
  Posted 12 days ago with 18 member flags