What happens when tire chains won't do the job?, page 1
Pages:
ATS Members have flagged this thread 3 times
Topic started on 8-11-2011 @ 10:17 PM by Evolutionsend
Well, you could just not go anywhere. That's not always an option though. Enter, the mattracks system.





For a hefty price tag these babies will turn any 4x4 into an off-road vehicle in a class that not even the Hummer H1 can touch. They also make them for UTV and ATVs. They're not only good for snow, but they're also capable in the mud as well. The only real downsides are the price tag (7,000-50,000 from what's floating around the net), and the 40 mph top speed on pavement.

Manufacturer's website
edit on 8-11-2011 by Evolutionsend because: (no reason given)



reply posted on 8-11-2011 @ 11:40 PM by Evolutionsend
reply to post by ShadowMaster



These work very differently than a real tracked vehicle. A 4x4 weighs a lot less, so the flotation you get is amazing. From a mechanical standpoint, the biggest problem I can see is the weight of the assemblies. According to their website they weigh 360 lbs each! 360 lbs per wheel, 720 lbs per axle, is a lot of weight. I wouldn't be surprised at all if these things busted axle housings on straight axle trucks. Each assembly probably weighs about 5 times what the axle was intended to handle. Not good!

Evidently it's not a problem in snow though. I'm not sure I would trust it in mud without using caution.



reply posted on 9-11-2011 @ 02:28 PM by Evolutionsend
reply to post by -W1LL



A Hummer h1 is based on the military Humvee. Not sure why ATS insists on confusing the h2 with the h1, it's kind of annoying. H1 = Arnold model, H2 = trashy suburban convert. That is all.


reply posted on 9-11-2011 @ 02:34 PM by Evolutionsend
reply to post by therainmaker



I can see that being a problem given the unsprung weight we're talking about. The beefier the truck, probably the better off you would be. The trucks in those videos, the Bronco and the Samurai, both have stout axles for their size. I would think a vehicle with already stout axles would be preferred.


reply posted on 9-11-2011 @ 05:41 PM by Evolutionsend
reply to post by kdog1982



Snowmobiles get really cold. You can also haul a fair amount with these things over deep snow. I never said it was cheap, but it is very cool.



Neat little before and after type video. That's an H3 for those of you that still don't know your hummers after almost 20 years.
edit on 9-11-2011 by Evolutionsend because: (no reason given)



reply posted on 9-11-2011 @ 06:18 PM by ga-`tv-gi
reply to post by Evolutionsend




H2 = trashy suburban convert

I second that, Iv seen these for ATV's also
edit on 9-11-2011 by ga-`tv-gi because: (no reason given)



reply posted on 10-11-2011 @ 09:39 PM by Evolutionsend
reply to post by ScottishBiker420



Argos can't go through snow worth a crap though. In fact, they've always had center ground clearance issues. About the only thing an argo is good at, is crossing slow moving water that they can float over. One rut on an ATV trail and your ultimate vehicle becomes the ultimate anchor. BAD rut clearance.


reply posted on 10-11-2011 @ 09:57 PM by ScottishBiker420
reply to post by Evolutionsend



Good point...but i tend to look at most vehicles with a scope to modify,perhapswith snow-shifting equipment fitted to the front...and offsetting the drive to gain more clearance,would be hard to re-seal the hull but perhaps in a shtf scenario a vehicle that could cross water would be better in a given situation...from the experiance ive gained through my time wrenching and modifying vehicles adding these behemoth tracks to a standard drive-train without serious modifications to the gears,clutch and bearings with all the increased parasitic drag of the system would result in constant burned out clutches amongst possible stripped gears and in a apocalyptic scenario where car prts are becoming like a currency durability is key IMO


reply posted on 10-11-2011 @ 10:20 PM by Evolutionsend
reply to post by ScottishBiker420



Actually the steering knuckles, stub shafts, ball joints, and axle u-joints would take the brunt of the breakage. The assemblies give a gear reduction in much the same way that a portal axle does, which means the only breakage would be due to lateral forces on the axle shafts themselves. Your clutch would also be safe, unless you drive like a moron.

I'd recommend you use them on a solid axle truck, brace the axle housings, and upgrade the u-joints and stub shafts to the best you can get. Many after market companies offer upgrades for that area, because it's also a common problem when fitting bigger tires, even when using larger O.E.M. axles. Full floating axles would also be the best axles to have, because it takes all the weight off of the axle shafts. You could probably get by with standard axles with upgrades though.


reply posted on 16-11-2011 @ 07:35 PM by ScottishBiker420
reply to post by Evolutionsend



Ahhi see,i thought they went straight onto the hub,and drove the track sraight off the hub,yeah in that case they seem pretty good,well apart from the service life of the tracks and when they need freeplay adjusted oiled etc etc,havent seen a set up close yet though,we dont really get stuff like that often in the UK as we dont get the mad weather often enough would love to get a 4x4 quad and shoehorn some on

Pages:     ^^TOP^^



What Plants Vs. Zombies Game Taught Me....
  Posted 8 days ago with 58 member flags
Do you have a supply of ramen noodles in your prep stores?
  Posted 18 days ago with 48 member flags
For the love of God, Buy yourself a can opener!!! NOW
  Posted 13 days ago with 24 member flags
Pennies & Nickels
  Posted 18 days ago with 17 member flags
Who Here Is CPR Certified?
  Posted 8 days ago with 11 member flags