posted on Nov, 8 2011 @ 02:42 PM
ERUSALEM, Nov 8 (Reuters) - Should the Israelis
attack Iran, they would probably focus strikes on select nuclear facilities while trying to avoid killing civilians en masse or crippling the oil
Past operations by Israel, such as the 1981 bombing of Iraq's Osirak atomic reactor and a similar strike against Syria in 2007, suggest a strategy of
one-off pinpoint raids, due both to military limitations and a desire to avoid wider war.
we are on the brink of what could be the greatest threat to all man kind , the real use of nukes and the Israel Iran war.
Iran has said with Russia's backing; "this will be all out war if they do attack".
Both sides have come to an impasse, that is to say one must give way to the other Israel will not stand for this , Iran have a nuke? No way, no how;
Iran let Israel take out its nuke plants? No way no how. will we in the west let this be between them ? will Russia sit back and do the same ? Do
nothing let them do what they will do and not interfere, I doubt it. Then what could Iran do; air strikes on Israel?
Missile launches? if so how accurate are they?
could one hit the temple mount?
how would the Muslim world react to this?
Some serious thinking needs to be done.
should Iran be left alone and let it build the bomb?
would Iran use it as a first strike weapon or would it be like all other nuke nations use it only if nuked?
what is your view.