It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

shall non-religion people have right to vote?

page: 3
0
<< 1  2    4 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Sep, 2 2004 @ 08:57 PM
link   
Has this proxxx's guys posts disappeared for anyone else? Seriously, I cannot see anything he is saying, and its only his posts I cannot see. Anyone else having problems here?




posted on Sep, 2 2004 @ 08:57 PM
link   
Since proxxx is no longer among us, and many of us don't even know what the post was....
should a MOD close this thread???



posted on Sep, 2 2004 @ 08:59 PM
link   
he is gone gone gone gone gone!!! YAY!!!!!!!!!!!!!! yea, most definitely this thread should be de-let-ed! MUCH LUV to ALL!!!!



posted on Sep, 2 2004 @ 09:00 PM
link   
I bet he is on a universal ignore!?!?!?!?



posted on Sep, 2 2004 @ 09:00 PM
link   
I keep seeing that he is posting on other threads, so I was wondering how he is still posting if he has been banned? Weird.



posted on Sep, 2 2004 @ 09:02 PM
link   
I don't think banned...yet. I looked at another post of his, and his post is missing. I've seen the mods put posters on a universal ignore, I guess until they figure out what's up.



posted on Sep, 2 2004 @ 09:03 PM
link   
if he's still here he needs to be gone. personally i think he is a kid....trying to be smart. someone tell him to go.



posted on Sep, 2 2004 @ 09:17 PM
link   
.
Does proxxx have godlike powers? Unlike us mere mortals.
Wave the magic wand, Presto, the posts disappear.
.



posted on Sep, 2 2004 @ 09:46 PM
link   

Originally posted by slank
Isn't the minimum age to run for president 35? Are you saying you were born in 2001? and are only 3 years old? Time for a reality check.

Am i correct about the minimum age for president to be 35 yo?
(If I am in error please correct me, but that is what i found online)
.


i dunno i thought it was 45, i thought the rules to run were 1. american citizen 2. born in america 3. u have to be 45

i think you have to be like 35 to run for senator or govener and 40 to run for suprime court and 45 to run for president. i may bee wrong though im not exactly the smartest bannana in the bunch. but my plan is perfect. first i become a respected member of a community then i run for mayor then senator then if i need more experience run for governer then try to run for president. i am already at a higher intelegence than some of the presidential candidates now i saw some at a website who only had a 8th grade education.

btw: im 14 not 3, if i was 3 i would be the baby genious or somethin.
the reason i picked whatever year that i said it would be the first year i would be elegable to run for president. is because that is the first voting year that i would be eligable i would actually be 47 i think.

edit: i have just been informed that the legal age to run for president is actually 35. guess i got my statistics wrong.

Dan Todd for President 2024!

[edit on 2-9-2004 by DanTodd]



posted on Sep, 2 2004 @ 10:05 PM
link   
Yes unless they have amended the constitution [which im quite sure they haven't]

Clause 5. No Person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President; neither shall any person be eligible to that Office who shall not have attained to the Age of thirty five Years, and been fourteen Years a Resident within the United States.
linder.house.gov...

GREAT NEWS!! You can run in 2026 now. You might just get my vote provided we both survive that long.
.



posted on Sep, 3 2004 @ 07:53 PM
link   

Originally posted by torque
It's not a war between Christians and Muslims. It's a war between terrorists and everybody else.


I agree that it's not a war between Christians and Muslims. However, it is a war between Muslims and the rest of the world. If you look closely, you will see a couple of interesting things:

1) Terrorists are Muslims.

2) People of other faith, or no faith at all, don't strap on bombs and blow up women and children. Muslims do!

3) The Muslim community around the world does not speak out against the Muslim terrorists. Occasionaly, under pressure, a single Cleric may make a quiet statement. Very rare. However, there is no mass Muslim discontent at the actions of their brethren killing non-combatants.

4) Muslims believe there are two types of people: Muslims and Infidels. Infidels should be converted to Islam or killed in order to make Allah happy.

You may wish to ignore the above and you can. At least until they start blowing up your family or kicking in the door to your home in order to kill you. At that point, it will do no good to believe. It's too late!



posted on Sep, 3 2004 @ 07:55 PM
link   
Regarding the original question: Subject: shall non-religion people have right to vote?

I'm wondering if only non-religious people should have the right to vote? Clear minds make better judgements. :-)

Kick that one around a little. haha



posted on Sep, 3 2004 @ 08:12 PM
link   
Did proxxx say something about my avatar looking like jesus or something of the sort, because phycosgirl made some comment about it. Anyway, glad this guy has been banned, and I hope that there are no more people like that on this board.



posted on Sep, 3 2004 @ 09:27 PM
link   
he said "don't think you are jesus just because you have a picture of jesus under your name." go figure..........???????????



posted on Sep, 4 2004 @ 12:53 AM
link   

Originally posted by doc2

Originally posted by torque
It's not a war between Christians and Muslims. It's a war between terrorists and everybody else.


I agree that it's not a war between Christians and Muslims. However, it is a war between Muslims and the rest of the world. If you look closely, you will see a couple of interesting things:

1) Terrorists are Muslims.

2) People of other faith, or no faith at all, don't strap on bombs and blow up women and children. Muslims do!

3) The Muslim community around the world does not speak out against the Muslim terrorists. Occasionaly, under pressure, a single Cleric may make a quiet statement. Very rare. However, there is no mass Muslim discontent at the actions of their brethren killing non-combatants.

4) Muslims believe there are two types of people: Muslims and Infidels. Infidels should be converted to Islam or killed in order to make Allah happy.


1.)it is true that most muslims are terrorist but not all terrorist are muslims. so switch those two around. the oklokoma city bombing wasnt done by the muslims. not that i know of atleast i dont think those guys were muslims. anyways i once saw a commedian say that terrorist arent just muslims. for example if you get arrested by a cop, that could be like a terrorist. because he is bringing terror to the person who gets arrested. doesnt really make any sence but someone will get it someday.

2.) well not exactly, it is true that muslims are tought to do that but alot of christian people think that they were sent by god to kill people. like manson and this guy on a law and orde episode i saw once.

3.) dont exactly understand what your saying but my answer to this quote is "true"

4.) the muslim religion is a currupt religion. any religion that you can kill people is currupt, very very currupt. and im sure we all wish it never existed.



posted on Sep, 4 2004 @ 12:57 AM
link   
EDIT: Sorry this was covered. Should read the whole thread before I jump in.

And I do believe proxxx is on global ignore.
Seems as if the mods are being far to kind to not ban them already.

[edit on 9/4/2004 by phreak_of_nature]



posted on Sep, 4 2004 @ 01:03 AM
link   
yea someone already said that......... read the entire thing before posting please..... the year i am actually running for president is 2024 or sometime later im not sure, i might need more experience than 12 years.



posted on Sep, 4 2004 @ 01:12 AM
link   
To add to the non muslim terrorists:

IRA: Christian
ETA: Christian
And then you also have that sikh seperation group in India.
Then theres also resistance groups in china, mafia groups like the Yakuza and Russian mob, that don't mind blowing something up or killing a few douzen people to have things go their way.

Theres loads of others offcource, pritty much every guerilla fighting force can get classified as terrorists if you read the definition.

The difference between being called "a guerilla group" and "terrorists" these days entirely depends on "are they supported by US or not"



posted on Sep, 4 2004 @ 01:22 AM
link   
Here's another one, the JDL. Jewish Defense League.

They have been accused of plotting to blow up mosques in the states.



posted on Sep, 4 2004 @ 03:13 PM
link   

Originally posted by thematrix
The difference between being called "a guerilla group" and "terrorists" these days entirely depends on "are they supported by US or not"


what terrorist actually are and what america thinks are terrorist are completely different.



new topics

top topics



 
0
<< 1  2    4 >>

log in

join