It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Aqualung2012
Originally posted by DJMSN
reply to post by Aqualung2012
Well begging your pardon IF...and its a big if...this person already told his story on the radio I must assume he used his name since you know him and recognized him so you do not need his permission as he already gave up secrecy for over the top story telling...either spill the beans or do not post until you are able to provide at least a smidgen of proof and lately proof or evidence is very light on ATS
Again, as I said in the OP, this was relayed to JPW via telephone call from "Mr. Jones'" good friend.
Want some beans??? Okay.
The actual caller goes by the name "Mobius" and is a very active member right here on ATS, as well as many other forums, and is the cheif researcher for Speaking of Strange. Another bean? The man who visited the Summit has the last name of Van Der Burg.
That's all I can share. It was a radio broadcast, can't find the archives or I would DEFINITELY post that as well.
I respect your skepticism believe me. But, it is what it is.edit on 7-11-2011 by Aqualung2012 because: correctionedit on 7-11-2011 by Aqualung2012 because: for respect of the informer
Originally posted by Aqualung2012
Originally posted by karen61057
reply to post by Aqualung2012
Just one question Aqualung and believe me I want this to be true. I do think they are here. I have no experience of my own. The question: This broadcast was from May of this year? If so then those "weeks" as in "Weeks away" have passed. The White House just issued their official answer regarding the extraterrestrial question and I don't see them back peddling on their offical response. So if it was weeks ago last May where are we now in regards to this I wonder??? I won't hold my breath, I've been disappointed in the past.
Weeks was relative, and perhaps a bit sensational on my part. The overall concensus on this topic is that by (2012) this will all happen. I apologize for using weeks instead of months, but never the less, the timeframe IS now.
I thought it was quite convenient how the US posted this official response (which was done prior to receiving the required amount of sigatures on the petition,) but since when do we trust what they tell us?
It is up to specualtion the exact date, but I would say that this could happen before 2012, or on jan 1, 2012, or even later in the year. Overall though, I believe we can expect this to come to play before the famous 12/21/12
Originally posted by karen61057
Originally posted by Aqualung2012
Originally posted by karen61057
reply to post by Aqualung2012
Just one question Aqualung and believe me I want this to be true. I do think they are here. I have no experience of my own. The question: This broadcast was from May of this year? If so then those "weeks" as in "Weeks away" have passed. The White House just issued their official answer regarding the extraterrestrial question and I don't see them back peddling on their offical response. So if it was weeks ago last May where are we now in regards to this I wonder??? I won't hold my breath, I've been disappointed in the past.
Weeks was relative, and perhaps a bit sensational on my part. The overall concensus on this topic is that by (2012) this will all happen. I apologize for using weeks instead of months, but never the less, the timeframe IS now.
I thought it was quite convenient how the US posted this official response (which was done prior to receiving the required amount of sigatures on the petition,) but since when do we trust what they tell us?
It is up to specualtion the exact date, but I would say that this could happen before 2012, or on jan 1, 2012, or even later in the year. Overall though, I believe we can expect this to come to play before the famous 12/21/12
I'm not one who thinks the govt is lying to us at every turn. Just in the last two days supposed lies from our govt have been shown to not be lies after all. The first was when NASA said that YU55 would not hit us and that was the truth although there were some who claimed otherwise. The second was regarding the nationwide test of the emergency broadcast system which of course was supposed to be a way of having all emergency personnel in place for the actual emergency about to take place. (please see #1 above ) There were no lies told to us about these things.
I do think that with something like ET they did lie as I have heard witness testimony that they have lied about this from members of their own organizations, so yes they do lie but no they do not lie about everything. That allows me to draw that line when I think there may be truth in the whistleblowers testimony. Its a balancing act at best.I believe in a creative force within the universe and I do not see the sense in that force making us and no others like us. The very fact that there have been other species of man just on this planet alone makes the idea of no others anywhere else plain old silly. I do think Man is out there, though they probably did not name themselves Man. The species by any name is probably prevalent. Likely other bilateral creatures as well. That form seems to be optimal for survival.
Originally posted by Rock Ape
It's threads like this that have made the UFO/Aliens forum nothing more than a joke. And not a funny joke.
It takes away all the hard work and research that true UFOlogists put in and give us plausable accounts of enounters, even tho the best UFO reports have no proof to them, except maybe a few fuzzy pictures or a grainy YouTube clips. I'd rather read them, than some made up rubbish.
Just my 2 dinari's worth
Peace
Rock Ape
Originally posted by cluckerspud
Just checking in to see if disclosure has happened. Anyone?
*chuckles to himself as he already knows the answer.
Originally posted by reject
reply to post by Aqualung2012
Is Bigelow involved in any of this? You know, Deuce Bigelow, the american gigolo?
Originally posted by Ark005
As much as I believe that the governments are keeping secrets from us, I doubt that they have an agreement with the ETs. I do believe that they know about them, but actually 'in bed' with them, not so much. Mostly because why would the ETs care?
Originally posted by ThatGuy45
Originally posted by Ark005
As much as I believe that the governments are keeping secrets from us, I doubt that they have an agreement with the ETs. I do believe that they know about them, but actually 'in bed' with them, not so much. Mostly because why would the ETs care?
AN example would be this:
You have something i want. I know I can just take it, but in doing so would cause much drama...
Being the more intelligent, i would try to find a common ground (aka what you want) and then strike a deal.
Now, I get what I want, when I want it, and I have your blessing. Maybe even convince you we're 'friends'.
Its called 'Good Business'...... and yes, I buy it
Originally posted by Aqualung2012
Not that I've heard of.
Originally posted by Riposte
reply to post by Aqualung2012
Cool, thanks for registering 10 days ago to tell us about another disclosure prediction. We can file it away with the other disclosure predictions that we get every single day, for the past 50 years.
Originally posted by gillyp17
reply to post by Aqualung2012
It was YOUR post that said that Mobius was "a very active member here on ats". It was that what led me to make that "false assumption". Was i wrong to do so? were you telling untruths?. If i got it wrong, then i apologise for my mistake.