YU55 Closer Than JPL Indicates?, page 3
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5    6  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 140 times


reply posted on 7-11-2011 @ 11:31 AM by timetothink
reply to post by Daver2056



I was just discussing this with my husband...what would the effect of our gravity have on this object because of it's size in relation to the size of the moon? I know it has alot to do with speed and what not. Does anyone here have the ability to figure this out? And I just want to say, I know Phage is trying to be the voice of reason, which I appreciate, but the possibility exists that NASA's info is disinfo. No one else seems to be coming out saying they are following this thing, the numbers could be anything.


reply posted on 7-11-2011 @ 11:32 AM by clintdelicious
reply to post by ICEKOHLD



Why is every incoming asteroid/meteor in films or when being discussed compared in size to Texas all the time? I swear it always is! lol



reply posted on 7-11-2011 @ 11:41 AM by timetothink
reply to post by TinkerHaus



I think all we are saying is, if there is a chance something will hit us it would be nice to narrow it down to an area so we can stock up on some twinkies and chocolate milk to ride out the storm. If a storm is coming, most people have access to that info, but in this case most of the public is in the dark.
edit on 7-11-2011 by timetothink because: spelling



reply posted on 7-11-2011 @ 11:43 AM by SunnyDee
reply to post by Shadowalker



Links? And all Phage did was tell the OP to use the Horizons program. He didn't really say anything on this otherwise.



reply posted on 7-11-2011 @ 11:48 AM by TinkerHaus
Originally posted by timetothink
reply to
post by TinkerHaus



I think all we are saying is, if there is a chance something will hit us it would be nice to narrow it down to an area so we can stock up on some twinkies and chocolate milk to ride out the storm. If a storm is coming, most people have access to that info, but in this case most of the public is in the dark.
edit on 7-11-2011 by timetothink because: spelling


Well, we've got re-criticality at Fukushima, a 2012 election that could change the course of history (for the better or worse), OWS protests all over the country, nuke plants being given extensions of their charters even with documentation showing a long history of neglect and disrepair, and a very serious situation brewing with Iran.. I think there are more realistic threats to concern ourselves without making up doomporn fantasies about an object that has been on our sights for years and is known by agencies throughout the world to end up being a near-miss.

You should already have a stock of twinkies and pepsi, or whatever you plan to survive on without this fictional doomsday event there to motivate you.. Because when one of these REAL threats breaks out, because we were all too busy making up doomsday scenarios to address them as a whole, you're going to need it.


reply posted on 7-11-2011 @ 11:49 AM by Shadowalker
reply to post by SunnyDee



Try web spiders lol.

There is plenty of trajectory information out there. The problem is the panic bugs here keep referencing flat maps. which is fine because to them the earth is flat too and we wouldnt want to sail over the edge in our wooden ships.

No really im super busy but let me see if I can fish out a youtube that explains it step by step. hold on.


reply posted on 7-11-2011 @ 11:55 AM by MamaKnows
reply to post by storm2012



Odd thing is recently they had no clue where that satelite was coming down so why do they know so much about an asteroid? You would think they would have more control and at least better coordinates for their own satelite than an asteroid.


reply posted on 7-11-2011 @ 11:55 AM by TomServo
reply to post by Shadowalker


This goes for everyone... I Never said its going to hit earth. I dont know either way. I am strictly flagging an inconsistency in the data provided by JPL. I provided a bit if analysis, yielding alternative results. It's up to each of you to come to your own conclusion. The distance/time chart is a simple enough illustration, and imo should make anyone 'suspicious'!


reply posted on 7-11-2011 @ 12:03 PM by Epirus
Originally posted by MamaKnows
reply to
post by storm2012



Odd thing is recently they had no clue where that satelite was coming down so why do they know so much about an asteroid? You would think they would have more control and at least better coordinates for their own satelite than an asteroid.


There are a lot more variables involved with a satellite entering earth's atmosphere than there are with an asteroid traveling on a path passing by a planet with a known orbit.
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5    6  >>    ^^TOP^^



May 20/21, 2012: the true meaning.
  Posted 9 days ago with 25 member flags
Cool Eclipse pictures (Earth, Moon, Sun, Pleiades)
  Posted 9 days ago with 24 member flags
Why the 2012 Phenomenon is Real!
  Posted 12 days ago with 21 member flags
Nebula or Nibiru (May 28 2012)
  Posted 2 days ago with 19 member flags
World Message: Beginning May 26 thru Dec 21
  Posted 11 days ago with 14 member flags
newly discovered mayan calendars go beyond 2012
  Posted 19 days ago with 12 member flags
OMG: 2012 KP24 Incoming! Are we Doomed?
  Posted 4 days ago with 10 member flags
Secret rogue planet may be hiding behind Neptune
  Posted 15 days ago with 7 member flags