posted on Nov, 7 2011 @ 12:53 PM
reply to post by projectvxn
Links in Your OP
That's the skewed worldview of the millenial generation: everyone gets to be a victim, even the rapist.
The article paints the WHOLE generation not just occupy in this light.
She initially told officers that she had sex with a man in his early twenties and had engaged in sexual activity with several other people.
Some members of the group told CBS 11 the girl identified herself as a 19-year-old and never knew she was 14.
Willing sex! no sexual assault other than the man in question believed the girl about her age and happened to be wrong.( please do not single this
post to debate. because I DO NOT advocate sex with minors)
Members of Occupy Glasgow are working with police and other agencies to help with the investigation and to improve safety measures for those
involved in the protest.
I'll give You the assault but not the indifference that You Imply all Occupiers have towards the victims.
Both investigations are still open and Martin could not confirm any more details about the alleged battery or sexual assault.
This an alleged assault told to the reporter by someone that heard it from someone else. WTH really? this is credible enough to use as Your
5) Is an article from The New York Post and as can be clearly seen at
link they don't amount to much more than the National
enquirer to me with their sensationalism and bias.
6) I feel for this woman and am upset the crowd wouldn't help her find the perpetrator.
7) Another story from the biased Rag The New York post.
The man is accused of exposing himself three times on Sept. 29 -- once in Crown Hill, once near Alki Beach, and a third time on Capitol Hill.
Three days later, he was spotted at Pinehurst Playfield near Northgate, and then again on Oct. 3 at the Lakeside soccer field in North
This guy was not arrested at nor did his crimes happen at Occupy Seattle. He was said to have been taking part in the protests but of course people
that get off by exposing themselves would tend to gravitate towards a large crowd.
9) This is the exact same case as in link 2 so isn't even worth going into because You doubled up on Your stories to make it seem like there were more
incidents than there really are.
So You have doubled up stories, biased national enquirer esque stories, a couple "alleged" assaults that You're basing on 3rd hand information. a
story that didn't involve Occupy at all other than the perpetrator may(or may not) have been there on one particular day in his life.
Sorry but You're going to have to come up with some better evidence than what You have provided in Your first 9 links before I even consider reading
anymore of the links to sensationalism and fear mongering that occurs in Your OP.
edit on 7-11-2011 by Adamanteus because: (no reason