It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by christina-66
reply to post by relpobre000
This movement has attracted significant hours of msm attention globally.
This movement is keeping alive the acute awareness we had in 2008 that big business had gone bust in the most spectacular fashion.
This movement is keeping alive the acute awareness that governments facilitated the corporate collapse with poor regulation and oversight.
This movement has got people talking.
This is a slippery slope logical fallacy and you should be ashamed to resort to such broken arguments. It's good to know that all this 'change' that the OWS is calling for is purely theoretical, as anything beyond holding a sign and yelling might lead to a pantless society without a sewer system.
The Twenty-sixth Amendment (Amendment XXVI) to the United States Constitution limited the minimum voting age to no more than 18.It was adopted in response to student activism
against the Vietnam War and to partially overrule the Supreme Court's decision in Oregon v. Mitchell. It was adopted on July 1, 1971. en.wikipedia.org...
I think people who are criticizing the OWS protestors are the "establishment" old and decrepit curmudgeons, envious of anyone able to get out of their chairs and march.
Originally posted by ManBehindTheMask
reply to post by newcovenant
I think people who are criticizing the OWS protestors are the "establishment" old and decrepit curmudgeons, envious of anyone able to get out of their chairs and march.
More tactics to call anyone who doesnt agree "stupid" or pro corruption.......
You can always tell when the OWS supporters have lost their argument because they accuse you of being something your not........you cannot have a different opinion......
We MUST fall in line..........we MUST agree........
well I WILL NOT trade one form of tyranny for another........
Originally posted by christina-66
This movement has attracted significant hours of msm attention globally.
This movement is keeping alive the acute awareness we had in 2008 that big business had gone bust in the most spectacular fashion.
This movement is keeping alive the acute awareness that governments facilitated the corporate collapse with poor regulation and oversight.
This movement has got people talking.
Can anyone show me what this movement has actually accomplished except for further dividing opinions? (my guess is nothing of note)..
Originally posted by relpobre000
Originally posted by mr-lizard
But then again, i'm assuming if these people DID start wearing hemp clothing and threw away their phones/cameras - you'd be the type of person to call them dirty luddites and hippies eh?
That's you making assumptions about me. You don't know me and making those assumptions makes you appear ignorant.
As far as these people wearing hemp etc. I don't care what they do.
In the end I have no stock in this little 'revolution'. They won't accomplish anything
edit on 7-11-2011 by relpobre000 because: blah
Originally posted by Skippy1138
reply to post by mr-lizard
Originally posted by ManBehindTheMask
reply to post by newcovenant
I think people who are criticizing the OWS protestors are the "establishment" old and decrepit curmudgeons, envious of anyone able to get out of their chairs and march.
More tactics to call anyone who doesnt agree "stupid" or pro corruption.......
You can always tell when the OWS supporters have lost their argument because they accuse you of being something your not........you cannot have a different opinion......
We MUST fall in line..........we MUST agree........
well I WILL NOT trade one form of tyranny for another........
WHAT do you hope to accomplish by gathering in the park??? And I have to be honest...while you are patting yourselves on the back that you have raised awareness, you need to realize that mainstream America thinks OWS is a joke. So they are mostly aware of something they think is a JOKE. While I respect your passion, I do disagree with many of the multiple the messages overall, and think that your anger should be directed toward the government. I think the movement would have garnered a LOT more support if it had been "Occupy the government".
The Twenty-sixth Amendment (Amendment XXVI) to the United States Constitution limited the minimum voting age to no more than 18. It was adopted in response to student activism against the Vietnam War and to partially overrule the Supreme Court's decision in Oregon v. Mitchell. It was adopted on July 1, 1971.
very interesting and valid perspective... at first tbh it looks silly and hypocritical but when you look at the big picture it is very different. They are using their products AGAINST the corporations as you stated... the products are not the problem... it is neglect of the voice of the people, greed, and manipulation which is the problem
Originally posted by doctornamtab
Originally posted by Skippy1138
reply to post by mr-lizard
How is this photo a judgement against OWS? Aren't they upset that corporations have weasled their way into every single aspect of our life? Arent they protesting that its IMPOSSIBLE to escape corporate capitalism?
So what does this photo even prove except that we're all shoulder deep in corporate products, protestors and non protestors alike.
At least there are people out there using corporate products AGAINST corporations.
There's nothing wrong with corporations or products themselves. Its how they're USED BY PEOPLE that makes them good or bad for people.
This photo is actually reenforces OWS message.
You won't do this, however. You won't do the one thing that could save you. I know you won't, and the corporations know it too. You are 100% corporate raised, and 100% corporate owned. You protest their behaviour, but existence without them is completely incomprehensible to you. They have existed since before you were born, and you have no understanding of what life would be like without them.
Much of white America supported desegregation but didn't support the demonstrations, the passive resistance and civil disobedience that Dr. King had learned from Thoreau and Gandhi - and from Mrs. Parks, for that matter. This was a kind of ambivalence on the part of white Americans, and it gave some unscrupulous figures in local, state, and federal government the opportunity to try to skew events - and press coverage - their way.
Originally posted by petrus4
It's because the movement genuinely deserves derision. I finally realised the same thing about Anonymous more generally.
For the most part, they are a group of gullible, utterly naive, adolescent dupes who get led around by the nose, by the very people they claim to be fighting against. The "Arab Spring," hasn't occurred for any reason other than for the Arab puppets to be exchanged for others, who can be more readily controlled by foreign interests, and who have not committed visible attrocities, so it will be easier for them to manipulate their populations.
The other thing that needs to be understood here, which I have repeatedly tried to emphasise, is that protesting in the manner that they are doing, is a completely, utterly worthless, and futile activity. There is only one thing that can be done to bring down the corporate world, and it is the one thing which Occupy can be counted on not to do.
That one thing is boycott. All of the teenagers who have attended Occupy protests have one thing in common; they are all carrying a mobile phone in one hand, and an IPod in the other. They are still paying mobile phone subscription fees, and they are still paying for music from ITunes. They are probably also still buying cans of Coke, and eating from McDonald's.
In other words, these protestors are not detrimentally affecting these corporations, in any way that said corporations care about, whatsoever.
THE ONLY THING CORPORATIONS CARE ABOUT IS MONEY. THEY CARE MORE ABOUT MONEY, THAN THEY LITERALLY CARE ABOUT BEING ALIVE IN ORDER TO SPEND IT.
So you can stand wherever you like, and wave idiotic placards for as long as you like. It will accomplish absolutely nothing. The only group that will potentially be harmed by this, other than the protestors themselves, are the police who are behaving in as moronic and cowardly a manner as usual, by shooting themselves in the foot with excessive force. They don't realise that the only thing they need to do here is wait.
What needs to happen, is something that these corporate-raised children, most of whom were born after 1990, are incapable of literally comprehending, let alone actually doing.
YOU NEED TO BEGIN MAKING THE THINGS YOU NEED TO SURVIVE, WITH YOUR OWN HANDS. YOU NEED TO STOP GIVING CORPORATIONS MONEY FOR THESE THINGS, AND START TO PRODUCE THEM YOURSELVES.
That means learning textiles and making your own clothes, rather than continuing to pay for mass-produced, Chinese sweatshop crap, which costs $15 apiece and falls apart in 2-3 months. It means re-learning ALL of the old crafts; producing your own food, and ceasing to rely on corporate-produced electronics. Start learning about Tesla's patents if you want a non-corporate controlled version of the Internet; he predicted such a possibility, but via his ionospheric broadcast system.
Yes and like I had any say in what happend before I was born? Does this or any of the above statements contribute to maybe changing anything for the better?
They have existed since before you were born, and you have no understanding of what life would be like without them.
YOU DO NOT TRULY WANT FREEDOM, BECAUSE THAT WOULD REQUIRE YOU TO ACTUALLY DO SOMETHING DIFFICULT OR UNCOMFORTABLE.
So stop lying to yourselves, and stop lying to the rest of us. Just sit back, relax, play another iTunes-bought mp3, shove more GMO industrial pollution masquerading as food into your mouths, and continue to accept the corporate sodomy; because we all know that after a few weeks of making yourselves look edgy, rebellious, and cool, that's what you're going to go back to doing anyway.
You have no integrity, no discipline, no stamina, and no intelligence. You are incapable and, in all honesty, unwilling to produce genuine change.
There is an old joke about an optimistic kid that is left in a room full to the brim with horse sh*t. The people who left him there return about an hour later, and to their surprise, they find the boy happily digging through the sh*t and ask "Hey Boy! What are you doing?," to which the boy responds: "With all this sh*t I figured there's got to be a pony in here somewhere."
I recently took a tour of the Occupy Wall Street demonstration in Zuccoti Park, trying to find the pony.
Walking into the demonstration was like peeling layers of an onion. There was an outer layer of police, followed by a layer of observers, next came sign holders, then campers, and intermixed between them were pods of organized committees (media, law, art, tech, etc.). I spoke to many people, trying to get an idea of the main goal and purpose (pony) they were working toward. The pony I hoped to find would've come in the form of clear policy changes Occupy Wall Street wanted to see. For example, campaign finance reform, Wall Street compensation regulation or Congress term limits. There are still no 'official demands' from the collective, but there has been a lot of press around individuals claiming to make Occupy Wall Street demands. This truly democratic group was trying to do things in a new way, trying to hear and act on everyone's voice in the 99 percent. Unfortunately the result of this can turn into a decentralized cacophony of noise, signs, and demands. Aligned but not organized, loud but not focused.