What caused the damage to columns 145 through 152?, page 36

reply to post by hooper

---

reply to post by septic


Yes, it is you who speaks for the rest of humanity. What a buffoon.


In this case also true. Or close enough.

At least we're in agreement about one of the questions you were answering.

reply to post by septic

---

At least we're in agreement about one of the questions you were answering.

I am glad that in the case of this non-issue that you agree that I pretty much speak for the remainder of humanity.

So tell me all about these soft, hollow, light weight plane wings. How did you come to choose those particluar adjectives? We know the wing is not hollow, it was far from light weight and composed of steel and aluminum it wasn't very soft. So why do you use those adjectives?

reply to post by hooper

---

You know, I have changed my mind...you're right about everything.

Originally posted by septic
reply to post by hooper

---

You know, I have changed my mind...you're right about everything.

So, I take it then that you really don't have any basis for your word usage other than bias to a conclusion?

Originally posted by hooper

Originally posted by septic
reply to post by hooper

---

You know, I have changed my mind...you're right about everything.

So, I take it then that you really don't have any basis for your word usage other than bias to a conclusion?

Nah, I just figured out the only word usage allowed are the words that agree with you.

Of course, it's always important for me to keep to the topic, so once again:

What caused the left-to-right damage to columns 145-152?

reply to post by septic

---

What caused the left-to-right damage to columns 145-152?

Soon as you explain what caused you to use the words left-right other than the fact that is the direction you photoshopped in the arrrow.

Originally posted by hooper
reply to post by septic

---

What caused the left-to-right damage to columns 145-152?

Soon as you explain what caused you to use the words left-right other than the fact that is the direction you photoshopped in the arrrow.

Thank you for your kind response.

If I am incorrect in the direction I photoshopped the arrow, please photoshop one in the right direction.

Here are images from the left sides of the impact holes from each tower. Are you saying the damage isn't left-to-right?

reply to post by septic

---

Here are images from the left sides of the impact holes from each tower. Are you saying the damage isn't left-to-right?

The damage is outside to inside. Which was the direction the plane was travelling. Done.

Originally posted by hooper
reply to post by septic

---

Here are images from the left sides of the impact holes from each tower. Are you saying the damage isn't left-to-right?

The damage is outside to inside. Which was the direction the plane was travelling. Done.

False.

The plane was not traveling in that direction, and the swept back wing would have ensured it struck from the inside-out.











Next.

reply to post by andersensrm

---

I once thought it was explosives, but the logistics required to plant cutting charges would involve much more work than firing a few missiles, and explosives aren't consistent with the damage. The dents on the left sides of both gashes indicate something hit them and pushed them in...outside-in as hooper described.

At least the evidence of the gashes supports missiles. That is not to say explosives weren't also used, but when examining the damage on the left sides, it is clear something small and dense bent the columns, and a kinetic weapon like a missile's 12 inch by 60 inch 900 lb warhead fits the bill.

reply to post by septic

---

False.

Well, I guess that ends that. You've declared it false. I should have thought of that first.

The plane was not traveling in that direction, and the swept back wing would have ensured it struck from the inside-out.

No wait - the plane wasn't travelling from the outside to the inside of the building? I only have one word for that -
False.

Flight 93 was headed for Building 7
  Posted 13 days ago with 48 member flags

9/11 INTERCEPTED
  Posted 5 days ago with 45 member flags

9/11: The WTC Elevator Key
  Posted 15 days ago with 43 member flags

WTC7, the smoking gun that just will not go away until the traitors are rounded up
  Posted 6 days ago with 40 member flags

What are your favorite 9/11 debunking tactics?
  Posted 9 days ago with 17 member flags

Who is the Joker on ATS radio now running their mouth?
  Posted 17 days ago with 13 member flags

Was the government a co-conspirator?
  Posted 19 days ago with 9 member flags

British Police Want Us To Present False Flag Terror Evidence.
  Posted 9 days ago with 8 member flags

Newest topics, updated in real-time:

Newest topics getting flags, in real-time:

Newest topics getting replies, in real-time: