It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Requests for access to research flight hours begin with the submission of an Initial Request for Aircraft Support (Word (35kb), PDF (30kb)) to the manager of the facility. Based on information provided on this form, a DOE-empowered advisory panel recommends to DOE an award of flight hours for the proposed use. Then the user completes a more detailed Research Aircraft Deployment Document (RADD: Word (180kb), PDF (85kb)) in coordination with the RAF manager. RAF users not associated with the DOE Atmospheric Science Program will need to work with the RAF manager on an estimate of the cost of offsite aircraft logistics such as 1) landing fees, 2) hangar rental, 3) ground support facilities, and 4) labor and expenses for a PNNL flight crew of two pilots and two scientific support personnel. During the preparation of RADD, schedules are confirmed and safety and environmental compliance requirements are addressed.
The RAF does not cover the cost of engineering studies and airframe modifications needed for custom installation of project-specific equipment and instrumentation. Such costs must be budgeted separately through a contract with PNNL or Battelle. When requested, RAF staff will assist users in estimating these costs.
*
Gulfstream-1 Research Aircraft
The G-1 is a large twin turboprop with performance characteristics of contemporary production aircraft. It is capable of measurements to altitudes approaching 30,000 feet over ranges of 1500 nautical miles, and can be operated at speeds that enable both relatively slow sampling and rapid deployment to field sites throughout the world. The aircraft is configured for versatile research applications. It accommodates a variety of external probes for aerosol, radiation, and turbulence measurements and internal sampling systems for a wide range of measurements. The G-1 has sufficient cabin volume, electrical power and payload capabilities, and flight characteristics to accommodate a variety of instrument systems and experimental equipment configurations. Internal instrumentation is mounted in removable racks to enable rapid reconfiguration as necessary. Data from most systems are acquired on a central computer that is tailored to airborne research data acquisition. In addition to acquiring the various analog and digital input signals, it can be configured to communicate with and/or control other systems onboard, and to provide time synchronization to other computers.
*
A fairly small budget as budgets go, but more than enough to actually prove the existence of chemtrails.
So why did they choose to miss this opportunity? Could it be that they don't want to truth to be exposed? Can't sell DVD's if it was known that chemtrails are a mere made up myth I suppose...
Why aren't chemmies interested in the truth?
Originally posted by dplum517
Also..... if you have read studies on Contrails then you know that those studies were preformed by Universities which were funded by NASA.
Originally posted by dplum517
reply to post by seabhac-rua
It's not simple. End of story.
Please enlighten us on how to "take samples" from a Chemtrail?
Keep in mind it has to be perfect and controlled perfectly so there is no arguing against the sample.
Also..... if you have read studies on Contrails then you know that those studies were preformed by Universities which were funded by NASA.
Not to mention they probably used pieces of equipment that cost $50,000 each.
The whole "it's simple ....just go get a sample up there between 20-40 thousand feet" ....is ridiculous.
and again..... PLEASE PROVE they are making money off of that movie ..... lol
...whatever little money they might make .... probably goes back into trying to find out the truth.edit on 7-11-2011 by dplum517 because: (no reason given)
I'm not saying they are making money, I'm just pointing out that there are charlatans everywhere. Why are you trying to defend the makers of this movie? You seem very touchy if somebody says something bad about 'What in the world are they spraying', hmm I think we have a case of 'believer' syndrome here folks. Go on a holiday, take a break, have a wank, do something to take your mind off the 'truth' for a while kid.
Originally posted by dplum517
They of course have even gone so far as to say they have debunked the entire movie.
Originally posted by dplum517
reply to post by Chadwickus
Wow. Gotta love Aussies. Classic case of Attack The Messenger.
Originally posted by dplum517
Please enlighten us on how to "take samples" from a Chemtrail?
Originally posted by dplum517
reply to post by seabhac-rua
It's not simple. End of story.
Please enlighten us on how to "take samples" from a Chemtrail?
Keep in mind it has to be perfect and controlled perfectly so there is no arguing against the sample.