posted on Nov, 10 2011 @ 10:43 AM
One of my biggest problems with the site is that, often, the original poster makes a statement, but doesn't actually comfirm or suggest that the
whole thing was done tongue-in-cheek and as satier. I mean, sure, all regular readers know that this thread was joking around, but I worry about
someone new who doesn't get the humorous tone this thread takes.
No, as we all know, Paul is completely unelectable. But we all know this.
Based on the inherent process done when doing straw polls, they are meaningles and open to dangers of significant.. I don't want to say fraud, but
I'll say concerns about the integrity of the process.