British student fights extradition to US - Operating a "link site," isn't illegal in UK, page
Pages:
ATS Members have flagged this thread 5 times
Topic started on 4-11-2011 @ 09:35 PM by drew1749

Richard O'Dwyer, the 23-year-old British college student behind the TVShack website, appeared in court Thursday to fight extradition to the United States. His attorney argued that O'Dwyer should not be sent to the United States because operating a "link site," which links to copies of copyrighted movies but does not actually host them, is not a crime under British law.

When we last wrote about O'Dwyer's case, we noted that his case is almost unprecedented. Only a handful of people have faced extradition to the United States for crimes committed entirely online, and most of those have involved computer hacking or direct distribution of copyrighted material.

The legality of "linking sites" in the UK is disputed. Last year, a judge dismissed a case against a similar linking site, called TV-Links, ruling that its actions did not constitute a crime.

O'Dwyer's attorney argued that his client's website was no different than Google or Yahoo!: it merely linked to content copied by others. He emphasized that O'Dwyer didn't charge users for access to his website. Instead, like Google and Yahoo he relied on advertising revenues.

But the US government disagreed, arguing that O'Dwyer had deliberately promoted links to content he knew to be copyright infringing. "TVShack had the top films listed on the home page so it wasn't merely a search engine," said government attorney John Jones.

Julia O'Dwyer, Richard's mother, told Ars that she's confident the court will agree that her son's actions are not a crime under British law. She also said there were key inaccuracies in the government's case.

"Richard has challenged the accuracy of the US skeleton argument," she said, "and so the US prosecution is now flapping around to get a response together which they couldn't do in time for today."

Her son is due back in court on November 22.


arstechnica.com...

I love how one sided our law system is. If it were the other way around, the US would refuse to extradite him to the UK. I hate the hypocrisy of all our laws and systems. The Justice system does about as much justice as a gang. It's ridiculousness like this that makes me not happy with anything the US government does..ever...
edit on 11/4/2011 by drew1749 because: (no reason given)



reply posted on 4-11-2011 @ 09:41 PM by drew1749
As always here's my reddit comment pick on the topic:



[–]rawfan (_) 68 points 5 hours ago (88|17)
I can't begin to explain how outlandish this is. Two stories come to mind:
a) a German computer science prof was arrested for violating US munition export laws when he entered the USA. His name is Klaus Knopper and he was arrested for making his Linux distribution Knoppix available for download from Germany (!) while not prohibiting people from certain countries to download it.
b) US v ELCOMSOFT
On July 16, 2001, Dmitry Sklyarov, a Russian citizen employed by ElcomSoft who was at the time visiting the United States for DEF CON, was arrested and jailed for allegedly violating the United States DMCA law by writing ElcomSoft's Advanced eBook Processor software. A landmark court case ensued, setting precedents and attracting much public attention and protest. On December 17, 2002, ElcomSoft was found not guilty of all four charges under the DMCA.
The guy was in prison for a year. How THE **** can I do something completely legal in my country, far away from US soil and be arrested there? Imagine German authorities arresting US citizens for hitting their children when they were back in the US (corporal punishment is outlawed in Germany).
I can't travel to the US because some published work I've done under freedom of research principles would violate the DMCA.
The US government asking the UK to extradite A KID because of a ****ing website takes this to a whole new level.
A question I ask myself: the content-industry holds a low percentage of the gross national product. How is their lobby powerful enough to make the US government ask for extradition or (in the case of Sweden) threaten with trade sanctions?


Edit: Also I believe I made a thread on this topic a few weeks ago. It was like US laws now apply internationally or something. I forget the actual topic. Anyways this sucks.
edit on 11/4/2011 by drew1749 because: (no reason given)

Pages:     ^^TOP^^



Ron Paul is NOT dropping out, the Mainstream Media is LYING.
  Posted 15 days ago with 111 member flags
Report: Romney Will Be Disqualified From Race Due To Fraud
  Posted 18 days ago with 105 member flags
Evidence of Vote Flipping in GOP Primary Elections
  Posted 7 days ago with 88 member flags
Fox News Analyst: First American to shoot down drone will be a hero
  Posted 14 days ago with 68 member flags
Mitt Romney scared Ron Paul is winning!!!
  Posted 7 days ago with 62 member flags
Let\'s just say it: Political Parties are the Problem
  Posted 12 days ago with 60 member flags