Originally posted by MathiasAndrew
Aloysius, first and foremost I would like to say to you that, you do not debunk chemtrails. Yes, you often ATTEMPT to debunk chemtrails. But you have
never actually successfully debunked them have you?
So why worry about me then??
Perhaps it is because I've certainly debunked a lot of your attempts to link various spurious technologies and papers that you say prove their
existence.....after all those are not actually chemtrails, so pedantic-sematically your comment might be correct in that respect??
BTW do you know what debunking means??
If so, where is the PROOF that chemtrails have been debunked? Where are the peer reviewed scientific studies and repeatable verified tests of
samples, that support your claim that you have debunked chemtrails? Clearly you try every day to debunk them and yet every day you fall short of your
lol - no - I see you do not know what debunking means!!
No wonder you do not think I have debunked anything - let me help you with that....
Debunking means removing bunk - bunk is probably derived from "bunkum" - empty or insincere talk;
So anyone. for example, says that "contrail only last a few minutes" I can debunk that - "de-claptrap" it - by showing that contrails can last for
various lengths of time. Eg this study
defines contrail persistence by the
width a contrail spreads to - 350m as the minimum for being "persistent" in their case, and
has time frames of 50 minutes and 2.5 hours - with contrails < 50 minutes
being termed "young".
When you say that a picture of barrels inside an aircraft with a "caution hazmat" sign visible is evidence of chemtrails then showing that the picture
is doctored is debunking.
You see debunking chemtrails is not about finding proof they do not exist - it is about examining the evidence offered supposedly showing that they DO
exist, and seeing if it is accurate, reasonable, factual.
So far none is.
And unless you are or have been a military aircraft mechanic involved in black ops missions. Then you shouldn't be taking this issues so
personal. As if you've been slandered.
So you are saying that only military and black ops a/c generate chemtrails? Fair enough - if that is the case then no, I'm not being slandered.
Trouble is that's not the case for most ppl - have a look around at how many people are complaining about airliners doing the dirty......
Not to be confrontational, but I'm not buying into your contrived reasons for wanting to debunk chemtrails 8 hours a day - 7 days a week.....
nope not buying it at all.
Given your track record on supporting chemtrails, and the level of evidence you bring to the debate I am delighted with your endorsement - thank you!
edit on 6-11-2011 by Aloysius the Gaul because: (no reason given)