It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Johannmon
What is so hard to understand about there being a relationship between aq and Iraq.
Originally posted by Johannmon
Saddam harbored aq. Helped to train them, Sent money to other terrorist organizations, and would do anything to strike at the USA. Was there a link? Of course there was.
Originally posted by JohannmonWas Iraq directly involved in 911? No but that does not mean there was no link. The 911 commision clearly states that there was a link between Saddam and aq just not a direct link to 911. Get your facts straight people. Listening to only what you want to hear will only make you blind to the truth.
Originally posted by Bleys
Originally posted by Cutwolf
Cheney was lying because he claimed that he never said that it was "pretty well confirmed" that Atta met in Prague. Yet he did say that.
That is a lie.
Where's the link to the "pretty well confirmed" statement?
Originally posted by Cutwolf
[url=Link with video clips of the interview ]All on this site[/url
Originally posted by Aelita
Saw it on TV last night: Cheney says that there has been a firmly established link between Saddam and AQ, then in a different interview a few months later says there was no proven link. When confronted by the reporter about his earlier allegations, he claims he never said there was a firmly established link.
He's a liar. Grady, are you reading this?
Originally posted by American Mad Man
Originally posted by Aelita
Saw it on TV last night: Cheney says that there has been a firmly established link between Saddam and AQ, then in a different interview a few months later says there was no proven link. When confronted by the reporter about his earlier allegations, he claims he never said there was a firmly established link.
He's a liar. Grady, are you reading this?
But then when Kerry says he was in Cambodia, that it was "seared" into his mind, then is proven he wasn't there, he is not a liar? Sounds like hypocracy to me.