posted on Nov, 3 2011 @ 11:55 AM
reply to post by My.mind.is.mine
Originally posted by Noey777
Originally posted by My.mind.is.mine
reply to post by Noey777
What's the difference between being shot for not going to Iran, and being shot IN Iran?? Let me know. Troops WILL die in Iran. I doubt they'd shoot
everybody. It wouldn't be a bad idea for somebody to get in touch with a couple of soldiers and try to get them to organize a strike.
ETA: How in the HELL is me suggesting a strike being on a "high horse"??
edit on 3-11-2011 by My.mind.is.mine because: (no reason given)
First off I am a veteran and put my butt on the line for people to have their say. The difference is that dying in a battle with honor yes honor is a
whole lot different dying at home in a cell with dishonor and if you have family it brings the punishment on them.
Second and more importantly Iran is the big bad wolf . Islam is the new communism , just like the soviet bloc wanted a world of communism to pay
homage to the government . Islam wants a world to pay homage to Allah and sharia law for all an if one can not see this they are blind. THE LEADERSHIP
OF IRAN WANTS WAR , they want the MAHADI to return and force Islam or the sword on all no more no less
That's where we differ. I don't feel that a preemptive strike against a nation who has done nothing but talk is honorable in any way. Those troops
would be lost in vein.
P.S. I'm a muslim, so I'ma tell you off jump your view of the faith is skewed. The point of Imam Mahdi is to unite Islam. The prophesied war, has been
prophesied in all major religions. It's not a "all muslims want to war" thing.
That's fine then you know what I say is true with the powers that be in Iran they don't agree with you and want this to come about. You can believe in
Allah all you want bit everything I said of the leadership of Iran is true.
PS I have not once put your religion down I merely stated facts of a radical regime with a radical belief.
edit on 3-11-2011 by Noey777 because: Clarification