posted on Sep, 2 2004 @ 05:54 AM
For me there are a few things in the images that make a lil alarm in my head go of of doctoring.
First would be the overbrighting of the rock surface under the 2 orbs, it looks wrong for some reason.
Seconds would be the quality of the 2 orbs in the image, compared to the quality of the rest of the image.
Third would be the typical pixel distortion you have with editing, around the aircraft.
First the lensflares look of, especialy if you look at the overbrighting of the rocks in the first image, I'd think the camera would sooner
overbright the full image with those orbs(that give that much overbright on the rocks in the first image) then give those lensflares, that by themself
Second, same as in first image, the aircraft looks a lil shopped.
Third would be the quality of the orbs(again) compared to the rest of the picture. If you look closely, the Jet seems to fire a missile causing the
lightflare under it, if you look at that flare, you can clearly see blockyness, wich you don't see in the orbs.
Thats from a sceptic view.
If the images were real, my guess on the aircraft would be an F16, going on the single tail.
The location is already established.
Dunno, images have several clue's to editing, if they aren't they are very interesting to say the least.
One thing I'd have to say is odd not about the image itself, but about the manuever of the jet. It strikes me odd how it would go from the position
in the first image to the position in the second image while the photographer has enough time to move himself to a seemingly lower point to shoot the