It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

I need your help with two images

page: 14
0
<< 11  12  13    15  16  17 >>

log in

join
share:
JAK

posted on Sep, 5 2004 @ 04:36 PM
link   
It does appear now that it must accepted as fact that DrJim did know initially that the images were faked.

Very recently I believe we all recieved a U2U from the Admin:



There has been a recent update to the ATS Terms & Conditions.
www.abovetopsecret.com...


On that page specifying the Terms and Conditions, right up the top is this:



By using this message board, you agree to the following:

1.) You will not post any material that is knowingly false, misleading, or inaccurate.



So I guess Dr Jim is in a little trouble then eh?

Read this and await your punishment Dr Jim.


Jack




posted on Sep, 5 2004 @ 04:39 PM
link   

Originally posted by markjaxson
It's got to be a game neither Skeptic Overload or Simon has told us this is not a game/test, and with everyone wondering if this is really a game i would have thought they would of said something along the lines of "This is not a game" but they havent so this has to be a game until they tell us otherwise.


what he said
I have to agree, they the Mods, Powers that be have not answer the question! so in order not to tell us lies, they say nothing, get me that car battery and jumper cables


[edit on 5-9-2004 by Sauron]



posted on Sep, 5 2004 @ 04:51 PM
link   
Simon queried me on my availability to respond here. I apologize for my inaction, since releasing these images, there has been some odd developments on our end.

I confess to not having the time to read the entire thread, but am amazed at the exceptional investigative thinking shown by many members. Here is an additional piece of the puzzle: www.abovetopsecret.com... (thank you for the directory Simon). The entire document contains enough information for a specific "Freedom of Information Act" request by a U.S. citizen for what seems to be a "Big Bend Incident Seven" (which is causing us to wonder about the first six). We're working with an associate to initiate this action.



posted on Sep, 5 2004 @ 04:58 PM
link   
If you allready knew where it was why ask?

It is strange that you ask for help but then say you allready Know.




posted on Sep, 5 2004 @ 05:01 PM
link   

Originally posted by switchblade
If you allready knew where it was why ask?

It is strange that you ask for help but then say you allready Know.



The work of everyone in this thread convinced us that BB = Big Bend.



posted on Sep, 5 2004 @ 05:04 PM
link   
Does no one find it strange how Simon posts something then DrJim posts a little later?


This is our second clue! Now we got to figure out the first 6 incidents (i think)

And does anyone know what was on the website that ranger guy found?



posted on Sep, 5 2004 @ 05:07 PM
link   
But it say's.


(intercept-9) has downed over big bend area while attempting to respond to two pulse vericles over the big bend area.


So what more do you want it to say?
And does'nt it say BB17?

[edit on 5-9-2004 by switchblade]



posted on Sep, 5 2004 @ 05:07 PM
link   

Originally posted by AgentSmith

Originally posted by Ranger426
I been askng around my freinds and 1 sent me this sight
www.geocities.com...


Good find there ranger, I've taken the liberty of posting the image that is on the site below, incase it gets moved or something...
I'll hunt around and see if I can find anything else....


Image from link provided by Ranger426



can you comment on this image. It seems strange that it was from a piece entitled big bend seven , which is now a term that you are using.



posted on Sep, 5 2004 @ 05:07 PM
link   
I can make out a kirtland AFB in the document.



posted on Sep, 5 2004 @ 05:09 PM
link   
This game just started and I'm confused already....lol

Good luck to those of you still interested....



posted on Sep, 5 2004 @ 05:13 PM
link   
big bend 6 google



posted on Sep, 5 2004 @ 05:13 PM
link   
Do you all think it means Big Bend or is that another clever code name for somewhere else entirely?



posted on Sep, 5 2004 @ 05:13 PM
link   
Just tried to make the doc seem abit more clear so here it is i have tried to make it as accurate as possible the ? are characters i cannot make out but maybe someone else can if its important.

SECRET FOR AFOSI ONLY
R 1911302 NOV 00
RANDOLPH AFB CD/1VOP
TO NOVE?BA AFOSI DIST 17 KIRTLAND AFB
INFO 7892 AINTFLG FT BELVIOR VA//INSR
REFER REQUEST FOR CONTAINMENT OF INFORMATION LEAK OF BBI7(BIG BEND INCIDENT 7) YOUR NSG 29203XQZ
SUBJECT CASE XP???801700G-132 HQ OR 44
FOLLOWING SUMMARY
A. AN AFB ANTI-INCURSION INTERCEPTOR (INTERCEPT-9) WAS DOWNED OVER BIG BEND AREA
WHILE ATTEMPTING TO RESPOND TO TWO PULSE VEHICLES OVER THE BIG BEND AREA REFER TO REPORT
NI89EQ1 REGARDING BBI7 FOR DETAILS
B. STANDARDIZED ON SITE CONTAINMENT OF INFORMATION LEAK HAS NOT BEEN EFFECTIVE IN...

It ends there.



posted on Sep, 5 2004 @ 05:19 PM
link   
it says kirtland AFB not Randolph AFB



posted on Sep, 5 2004 @ 05:22 PM
link   
google:
-------
ufo
sightings Report
the page wont let me copy any of it so heres the link
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
www.ufoevidence.org...

date 3/16/04 location Big Bend National Park Texas USA
Reportered by Matt Williams




[edit on 5-9-2004 by Sauron]



posted on Sep, 5 2004 @ 05:23 PM
link   

Originally posted by phantompatriot
it says kirtland AFB not Randolph AFB


What!

It say's Randolph even I can see that.



posted on Sep, 5 2004 @ 05:24 PM
link   
Eh?..Yes but if you look at the image he gave us it says randolph afb above where it says kirtland afb.

I found out what AFOSI means! But you all probably knew that anyway....Air Force Ofice of Special Investigations



posted on Sep, 5 2004 @ 05:26 PM
link   
I think you got the most of it... Several things caught my attention on first read:

1. It says that an interceptor was downed. This is at least strange when you look at that pic that Ranger (again??) found with the explosion... Also, note that on the second original pic, the plane seems to fire a missile towards the two "pulse vehicles", as they are named in the document.
2. My point 1. could easily explain why at first, that part of the image would be erased. Especially with my 3.
3. The source of the leak seems internal. Quote: Standardized on site containment of information leak has not been effective... If indeed the source is internal, they may not have wanted to show that the UFOs can down our best fighters that easily. It could obviously scare people...
4. Last, it seems to me a bit suspect, but well, that the classification of such a report would be only "secret". It is directed at the AFOSI, which we all know are deeply involved in UFO stories, and it is about information leak. It is particularly bizarre when one remembers that most if not all of the informations about UFOs, out of any official agency is classified over that, at least Top Secret.

Just a few thoughts...



posted on Sep, 5 2004 @ 05:30 PM
link   
hey I think we've got a whole lot more to check out here

www.abovetopsecret.com...


JAK

posted on Sep, 5 2004 @ 05:32 PM
link   
The date for the document appears to be the 17th November 2000

Jack



new topics

top topics



 
0
<< 11  12  13    15  16  17 >>

log in

join