reply to post by drew1749
The only appropriate response is a slow clap. I ask again ATS, why do we put up with this? What can we do to fix it?
We fix it the same way we created the problem, individually one person at a time. We created the problem by surrendering to expedience, (going along
to get along), and acquiescence to tyranny. We will fix the problem by understanding there is nothing at all expedient about surrendering our rights
to tyrants, and that non-acquiescence, in the end, will not be enough.
As for Samantha Zucker, and what she can do on an individual basis, or should have done, was first challenge the jurisdiction of the arrest, ensuring
that the judges dismissal would be due to a want of subject matter jurisdiction. The judge may have dismissed for this reason, I do not know. If the
judge did dismiss for want of subject matter jurisdiction, this is all the evidence she needs to file a verified complaint (an oath swearing under
penalty of perjury that she was injured and that the party causing the injury acted criminally) and have the arresting officers arrested themselves,
for such crimes as coercion, extortion, simulating legal process, acting under color of law, impersonating a police officer (if the arrest was
dismissed for want of subject matter jurisdiction this means the thugs who arrested here were not acting in any official manner, but instead upon
their own private beliefs as private citizens not afforded any immunity their office might afford), malicious prosecution, and obstruction of
justice.
Once people begin using the method of verified complaint to force the government to act in the way they are expected to, and start having criminal
thug rogue government officials arrested for their crimes, then we will begin to see a willingness by all parties to fix the damn problem. Until that
time comes, expect much more of the same.