this is a rather one sided question, most people view ron paul not as a savior but as a defender of liberty, a bit like a savior but he is not going to save amerca all by himself so i think it is overblown to view him as a savior.

At this point, a mechanic as President is starting to look good.

In that a good mechanic knows that if a part is broken, its more cost effective to replace it. Unless the 'vehicle in question' barely good is enough to drive to the junk yard. Then if he is honest, he'll tell you that you might be able to a few more miles out of it, while you save up for a car, or he'll say "Dude, give me a call before you drive, so I am not on the road when you explode... yes your car is that bad."


We can make a million analogies, we can posit Candidate A walks on water, farts with the odor of roses, and can piss on a plate without splashing. Or that Candidate D can't find his arse without a map, compass, GPS and a force recon team kicking him in it.

Both would be BS characterizations.

(Though I have known -people- who are always LLMF in the bush with out all of the above.)

IMO this next election is just like the prior one. You can take the easy to swallow poison or you can take the hard to swallow poison, but you are going to take the poison. (Poison being the metaphor to Presidential Candidates.)

You can just hope your tolerance to the poison is strong enough that you survive.

M.

"I can clearly not take the cup of front of me." ~Vicinee ( Princess Binde)