It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
At the same time, this indicates that the WMD that the Bush administration went to war over, are indeed in Iraq, and that the war failed to keep those weapons from getting into the hands of terrorists. On the contrary, the war put these weapons into the hands of terrorist.
Originally posted by Attero Auctorita
At the same time, this indicates that the WMD that the Bush administration went to war over, are indeed in Iraq, and that the war failed to keep those weapons from getting into the hands of terrorists. On the contrary, the war put these weapons into the hands of terrorist.
Even If this is really true, it doesn't mean that the WMD necessarily came from an official Saddam Hussein Iraqi chemical weapon stockpile (for instance, middle-eastern military factions could have brought the chemical weapons into Iraq at any time before or after our invasion and had no ties with el Saddam). As I see it, the only way the Bush-camp could justify this war now would be to find a massive chemical weapon stockpile that has "Iraqi Military Chemical Weapons Stockpile" written all over the building it is housed in...
-Attero
Originally posted by muppet
no mention of what chemicals were supposedly used..It sounds like propaganda to me too.
If that's the case though, the next question should be, who's propaganda is it? Who stands to gain by saying the Iraqi rebels have chemical weapons? Not the rebels themselves, certainly.
Originally posted by k33l
Not only monkey and b-liar would be shouting it from treetops (lovely sentence there Chris ) but don't you think iraqi resistance would have used them already if they really had them? They've got nothing to lose.