posted on Nov, 1 2011 @ 07:52 PM
i read through much of this companies 'Acceptable Use Policy' which showed a good portion of things which might get violated by the average user.
now what really keeps me thinking is ... they can in fact set up a rule for not allowing you to browse a specific website.. THEY CAN .....but...
they are not allowed to sniff on you to FIGURE you did.
cause this would touch your (in my opinion higher valued) right of having your privacy protected.
A few years ago i remember the usual procedure in case of illegal actions using the web (the kind of illegal defined by law, not by company-policies)
the provider gave a notice to a law enforcement ageny, which was ..in this case .. the FBI, and they just acted if a damage in access of $6000 had
been done.
Now since larger companies seem to have fun sueing individuals for downloading copyrighted content, they tried to change the system somehow, with the
ultimate goal that the hurdle someone takes action is lowered in a way that a provider can pull the plug in case of doubtful activity on its own. Just
to relief law enforcement to some point.
This results in having your providers start a kind of sniffing on you, which is basically not allowed for violating your privacy imho.
To all our misfortune this change came at a time where the government came on the brilliant idea to start sniffing for terrorists using the www INSIDE
the US, where the NSA was always being legitimated to sniff on communications cross the border (dating back for decades).
now as you'll see we live in some tricky times, cause if you challenge them for violating your privacy, you may get a bloody nose for still having
republican anti-terror laws backing your provider.
Another argument in this possible dispute is, that your provider can start claiming while you are using his property (routers etc) he has the the
right to have an eye on you since you are playing in his backyard.
(as far as i remember this argumentation came up with a doubtful use of facebook in a few cases)
sooo
its quite obvious to me that your privacy has been violated, but its obvious too that we are the sheeple, right now, till someone tears down specific
laws being in place atm.
i would still change the provider, or at least think in using a sort of encryption in case you think you have stuff to do noone has to look on. I
guess there are companies offering such sort of solution.