It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by curme
I'll tell you a funny story about vets and Kerry...So the In an unofficial poll that I've taken, vets support Kerry!
Originally posted by boogyman
The republicans released a list of weapons systems kerry supposedly voted against in his years as Senator. Did you know that these werent a series of votes spread over the years but a single vote on a 1991 pentagon appropriations bill? Did you know that even deeper cuts in military spending were at the time being advocated by some prominent Republicans including (surprise surprise) then secretary of defence Dick Cheney.
GOP Rhetoric on Kerry's Voting Record
Originally posted by groingrinder
There are thousands of criminals doing life sentences in American prisons who did far less than Oliver North. What is so courageous and patriotic about importing coc aine into the United States??
Originally posted by boogyman
Did you know that these werent a series of votes spread over the years but a single vote on a 1991 pentagon appropriations bill?
Originally posted by boogyman
Veterans who hate Kerry seem to display many reasons for their hatred of Kerry, including the fact that he is protrayed as antimilitary so my post is not at all off topic.
Originally posted by boogyman
I only really have problems with the people who just mouth of about things theyve heard repeated on the television with out actually looking into the facts behind the rhetoric and even when you give them evidence to the contrary they just steamroll past it with out even noticing.
Uniquely, FAIR works with both activists and journalists
Originally posted by Jemison
You can question the credibility of Oliver North all you want. It does not change the fact that his letter DOES represent the thoughts and feelings of many Vietnam Vets as well as many of our fine young soldiers that have in the past and are currently risking their lives for our Country.
Rather than trash the author of the letter, why not address the content of the letter. If Kerry (and his followers) would start to address some of the issues that come up rather than just whine about how people are trying to smear his name it would be much more effective.
If the only defense Kerry has is returning fire and pointing out the faults of the other guys it doesn't make him look any better than the other guy and in fact, it makes him look much worse.
Originally posted by Indy
.............The man is a convicted liar and a piece of garbage. I cannot have much faith in what any vet says that supports him. Gee.. "I support a man convicted of lying to congress" lol. Yeah.. that gives these hand full of vets total credibility. Who cares. You have a convicted liar in North and a womanizer and sexual harasser in Arnold supporting Bush.........
Originally posted by AntiPolitrix
If you are like me, you believe John Kerry never should of used his Vietnam Service as a center piece to his campaign but i am glad he did. It seems to be the worst thing he could of done.
This was e-mailed to me so i don't have a link but it is good to hear how other Vietnam Vets feel about Kerry and why.
-----------------------------------------
Bring it on, John
Oliver North
August 27, 2004
"Of course, the president keeps telling people he would never question my service to our country. Instead, he watches as a Republican-funded attack group does just that. Well, if he wants to have a debate about our service in Vietnam, here is my answer: 'Bring it on.'" -- Sen. John Kerry
----------------------------------------
Dear John,
As usual, you have it wrong. You don't have a beef with President George Bush about your war record. He's been exceedingly generous about your military service. Your complaint is with the 2.5 million of us who served honorably in a war that ended 29 years ago and which you, not the president, made the centerpiece of this campaign.
I talk to a lot of vets, John, and this really isn't about your medals or how you got them. Like you, I have a Silver Star and a Bronze Star. I only have two Purple Hearts, though. I turned down the others so that I could stay with the Marines in my rifle platoon. But I think you might agree with me, though I've never heard you say it, that the officers always got more medals than they earned and the youngsters we led never got as many medals as they deserved.
This really isn't about how early you came home from that war, either, John. There have always been guys in every war who want to go home. There are also lots of guys, like those in my rifle platoon in Vietnam, who did a full 13 months in the field. And there are, thankfully, lots of young Americans today in Iraq and Afghanistan who volunteered to return to war because, as one of them told me in Ramadi a few weeks ago, "the job isn't finished."
Nor is this about whether you were in Cambodia on Christmas Eve, 1968. Heck John, people get lost going on vacation. If you got lost, just say so. Your campaign has admitted that you now know that you really weren't in Cambodia that night and that Richard Nixon wasn't really president when you thought he was. Now would be a good time to explain to us how you could have all that bogus stuff "seared" into your memory -- especially since you want to have your finger on our nation's nuclear trigger.
But that's not really the problem, either. The trouble you're having, John, isn't about your medals or coming home early or getting lost -- or even Richard Nixon. The issue is what you did to us when you came home, John.
When you got home, you co-founded Vietnam Veterans Against the War and wrote "The New Soldier," which denounced those of us who served -- and were still serving -- on the battlefields of a thankless war. Worst of all, John, you then accused me -- and all of us who served in Vietnam -- of committing terrible crimes and atrocities.
On April 22, 1971, under oath, you told the Senate Foreign Relations Committee that you had knowledge that American troops "had personally raped, cut off ears, cut off heads, taped wires from portable telephones to human genitals and turned up the power, cut off limbs, blown up bodies, randomly shot at civilians, razed villages in fashion reminiscent of Genghis Khan, shot cattle and dogs for fun, poisoned food stocks, and generally ravaged the country side of South Vietnam."
And you admitted on television that "yes, yes, I committed the same kind of atrocities as thousands of other soldiers have committed." And for good measure you stated, "(America is) more guilty than any other body, of violations of (the) Geneva Conventions ... the torture of prisoners, the killing of prisoners."
Your "antiwar" statements and activities were painful for those of us carrying the scars of Vietnam and trying to move on with our lives. And for those who were still there, it was even more hurtful. But those who suffered the most from what you said and did were the hundreds of American prisoners of war being held by Hanoi. Here's what some of them endured because of you, John:
Capt. James Warner had already spent four years in Vietnamese custody when he was handed a copy of your testimony by his captors. Warner
says that for his captors, your statements "were proof I deserved to be punished." He wasn't released until March 14, 1973.
Maj. Kenneth Cordier, an Air Force pilot who was in Vietnamese custody for 2,284 days, says his captors "repeated incessantly" your
one-liner about being "the last man to die" for a lost cause. Cordier was released March 4, 1973.
Navy Lt. Paul Galanti says your accusations "were as demoralizing as solitary (confinement) ... and a prime reason the war dragged on." He remained in North Vietnamese hands until February 12, 1973.
John, did you think they would forget? When Tim Russert asked about your claim that you and others in Vietnam committed "atrocities," instead of standing by your sworn testimony, you confessed that your words "were a bit over the top." Does that mean you lied under oath? Or does it mean you are a war criminal? You can't have this one both
ways, John. Either way, you're not fit to be a prison guard at Abu Ghraib, much less commander in chief.
One last thing, John. In 1988, Jane Fonda said: "I would like to say something ... to men who were in Vietnam, who I hurt, or whose pain I caused to deepen because of things that I said or did. I was trying to help end the killing and the war, but there were times when I was thoughtless and careless about it and I'm ... very sorry that I hurt them. And I want to apologize to them and their families."
Even Jane Fonda apologized. Will you, John?
--------------------------------------------------
He has gone too far to turn back now, Kerry is done. G.W. 2004
Originally posted by Indy
Oliver North represents one thing and one thing only... himself. The man is a convicted liar and a piece of garbage. I cannot have much faith in what any vet says that supports him. Gee.. "I support a man convicted of lying to congress" lol. Yeah.. that gives these hand full of vets total credibility. Who cares. You have a convicted liar in North and a womanizer and sexual harasser in Arnold supporting Bush. Yeah thats some good stuff to have on your side. Course we can't forget the threats made of a terrorist attack by Cheney if we don't vote for him and Bush.
Originally posted by boogyman
I'm leaving you "patriots" and your pointless thread alone.
Talking here is pointless
Debating here is pointless
Originally posted by AntiPolitrix
Originally posted by boogyman
I'm leaving you "patriots" and your pointless thread alone.
Talking here is pointless
Debating here is pointless
So pointless you went through the trouble of replying. I havn't heard you debate ANYTHING so i am not sure what you are talking about. Set you hatred aside 'boogyman' and listen to the facts before you just discredit something he says. That is the problem with you people, you have your mind made up and the FACTS don't even change your mind. Maybe you should leave the thread. Bye
Originally posted by koji_K
������.. why don't you acquaint yourself with the facts about the supposed "patriot" North? How anyone can compare this man, convicted of lying to Congress to cover his own ass, to Kerry is beyond me����..
Originally posted by koji_K
How anyone can compare this man, convicted of lying to Congress to cover his own ass, to Kerry is beyond me.
Originally posted by keholmes
Originally posted by koji_K
������.. why don't you acquaint yourself with the facts about the supposed "patriot" North? How anyone can compare this man, convicted of lying to Congress to cover his own ass, to Kerry is beyond me����..
coming from a supporter of the democrats that is just , so tell me what do you think of clinton?