The Rude Pundit: "Yes, Liberals Are Totally Responsible for the Herman Cain Sexual Harassment Story, page 1

privacy

Pages:
ATS Members have flagged this thread 4 times

Topic started on 1-11-2011 @ 11:31 AM by negativenihil

With all the noise from the usual suspects over this Herman Cain sexual harassment story, The Rude Pundit decided to weigh in.

rudepundit.blogspot.com...

You know on thing that's really hilarious about conservatives? How they preach the "personal responsibility" dogma and then, when they're caught doing something wrong or ******* up, it's always someone else's fault. Asked something in a debate that makes 'em give an answer that reveals how ******* or stupid they are? It's a "gotcha" question. It's discovered that a leading presidential candidate settled a pair of sexual harassment claims against him? He's now "a prominent Conservative targeted by liberals simply because they disagree with his politics."

But screw it. The jig is up. They caught us. Again. You're right, you smart smarty conservatives.

UH OH!

Here's how we did it: See, back in the late 1990s, while Clinton was still in office, we knew that America was going to be begging to elect an executive from junk food restaurants to be president, probably once we triggered the Obama option that we'd been working on since 1961. Knowing that the most likely candidate would be Herman Cain, when he became the head of the National Restaurant Association, we went into action. We had oppo research that Cain liked to tell dirty jokes and talk and ask questions about the sexuality of the people around him. We got two of our female operatives to get into a position to be close to him at the workplace, and when he acted as expected, they brought accusations of inappropriate behavior against Cain.

Please see the link for the full story - it's a riot. I must want you The Rude Pundit is a fan of harsh language - and i've been careful to pick out clean parts of this story - however you've been warned. SWEAR WORDS AHEAD

edit on 1-11-2011 by negativenihil because: spelling HERP

reply posted on 1-11-2011 @ 12:06 PM by NuminousCosmos

I'm sure these allegations came back into the light from people within the Republican power structure. They can't (Perry/Romney puppets as controlled by their corporate backers) allow a possible 'outsider' to get too close to a nomination.

reply posted on 1-11-2011 @ 12:09 PM by FortAnthem

Here's how we did it: See, back in the late 1990s, while Clinton was still in office, we knew that America was going to be begging to elect an executive from junk food restaurants to be president, probably once we triggered the Obama option that we'd been working on since 1961. Knowing that the most likely candidate would be Herman Cain, when he became the head of the National Restaurant Association, we went into action. We had oppo research that Cain liked to tell dirty jokes and talk and ask questions about the sexuality of the people around him. We got two of our female operatives to get into a position to be close to him at the workplace, and when he acted as expected, they brought accusations of inappropriate behavior against Cain.

Aw c'mon, who's gonna believe a ridiculous theory like that?

Time trave with aliens is a much more probable explanation IMHO.

reply posted on 1-11-2011 @ 12:10 PM by cassandranova

It's funny how any time there is real news, allegations of a personal scandal monopolize the air waves in the United States. While the market tanked, Nero fiddled on.

reply posted on 1-11-2011 @ 01:43 PM by spyder550

It just goes to prove that you can't pull the wool over hannitylimbaughcolter. Just to clear up the record there were a bunch of us who thought this would be much more fun if we had waited til the convention.

reply posted on 1-11-2011 @ 02:12 PM by Blackmarketeer

Politico is also hinting the Herman Cain leak came from a "rival campaign". Mike Huckabee also accuses a rival campaign of leaking story (Mike Huckabee Accuses GOP Campaigns Of Leaking Story)

And what better way to leak it than to a "librul" media site so they can take all the GOP/conservative ire for trying to attack a conservative black (Ann Coulter just said "Our blacks are better than your blacks" - LOL).

Conservative leaders just ate one of their own, stabbed him in the back and served him up cold. Best of all, they got librul media blamed for it.

But yeah, this ranks right up there with liberals faking Obama's birth in the USA back in 1961 knowing one day he'd be pres.

reply posted on 1-11-2011 @ 02:39 PM by Aggie Man

Who really cares where the story originated from? This is an actual event that took place, which should be looked into, addressed by Cain and judged by the American people. We want our candidates properly vetted don't we? Or was "properly vetted" just right wing speak for we hate the Democrat in the White House?

edit on 1-11-2011 by Aggie Man because: (no reason given)

reply posted on 1-11-2011 @ 03:12 PM by OLD HIPPY DUDE

reply to post by NuminousCosmos

Let an 'outsider' to get too close to a nomination.

"OUTSIDER "? Are you kidding me ?
You better look at Cains ties to the Koch brothers.

reply posted on 1-11-2011 @ 03:32 PM by TreadUpon

reply posted on 1-11-2011 @ 03:32 PM by Vikus

Originally posted by OLD HIPPY DUDE
reply to post by NuminousCosmos

Let an 'outsider' to get too close to a nomination.

"OUTSIDER "? Are you kidding me ?
You better look at Cains ties to the Koch brothers.

It does explain how Obama got in even though people thought he was an outsider too. Obama and Wall Street run deep.

reply posted on 1-11-2011 @ 05:17 PM by NuminousCosmos

reply to post by Vikus

Let me rephrase: They're all a bunch of fatcats, liars, and party hacks ala W and Reagan. Cain just happened to be the flavor of the month, and the supposed 'underdog'.

Romney/Perry (W 2.0) can't lose their hold on what they believe is rightfully theirs; regardless of if he's a corporate goon like them.

reply posted on 1-11-2011 @ 05:25 PM by NuminousCosmos