posted on Apr, 22 2003 @ 07:28 PM
Clinton was as much a sociopath as Bush is. Both were and are horrid presidents who further the demise of America. the only difference? Clinton
focused his sociopathic tendancies inward on Americans, where as Bush is focusing his on the world. Clinton created a good mid east peace? This is the
man who said whd jump in a foxhole and fight for israel, who are THE reason we have so many problems in the middle east. We support them. They are
enemies of the arabs. they butcher palestinains and herd them off thier land, then move in thier own settlers. Zionist Israel has no desire nor
intention on peaceful co existance with its arab neighbors, and so long as we keep supporting Israel, we will have no peace either.
We havent had a good prez in years. The only presdinet I will ever say is a good one will be the one who comes, condemns and cuts off Israel. Until
then, every prez between now and then will still be israel ass kissers, socioopaths, and traitors.
Bush is no different from Clinton. Same drooling syncophant breed. Both should be tried as traitors for selling out the interests of the american
people to foreign powers.
So, Bush fans and clinton lovers, youre both wrong.
Clinton being a better speaker and a smooth talker makes him better? That should send alarms. That simpoly means hes better at feeding u his brand of
bull# better than the drooling borderline illiterate Dubya Junior can, and youre more likely to eat clintons line of BS quicker than u would Dubyas.
At least Dubya is so ridiculous and comic book like that u cant really take him seriously, hes simply too damn funny. Clinton was dangerous. Hypnotise
u with his love speeches and flowing words and charisma, so he can screw u and ull thank him while he does it.
Give America a real leader, and we might be saved from our own folly. Otherwise......forget it, well join Rome some day.