It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Paying their fair share?
Never shying away from class warfare, the union really has hit a new low here. According its latest available income tax form, CTA took in $186,216,493 in 2009. As a 501(c)(5), the union has a special tax exempt status with the IRS which is accorded to “Labor, Agricultural, and Horticultural Organizations.”
Hence, CTA would appear to be following the letter of the law in paying no money in taxes. But there is a bigger picture here, and it is bloated with hypocrisy. First CTA manages to siphon off $600+ yearly ($647 in 2011-2012) from every teacher in the state in forced union dues. Then it turns around and spends much of those dues on politicking -- over $211 million on politicking from 2000-2009 -- frequently on issues that have nothing to do with teachers or kids – and supporting causes that are contrary to the positions of many of its members. Then the union elites have the audacity to whine about millionaires and billionaires “not paying their fair share of taxes” when they don’t pay a penny, and all the while fund politicians who ensure that CTA’s pilfer-and-spend scheme rolls on undisturbed.
And just what do the “anti-greed” union bosses make for their efforts? In 2009, CTA President David Sanchez was compensated $289,550, three times what an average teacher in CA makes, while VP Dean Vogel had to suffer along with a mere $244,925 a year.
On a national level the union bosses do even better.
According to a recently issued LM-2 report (H/T RiShawn Biddle), we see that AFT President Randi Weingarten raked in a cool $493,859 last year. And NEA President Dennis Van Roekel managed to “earn” a whopping $543,868 in salary and benefits. I guess their justification for such high salaries is that it is very hard work to fight reformers who are actually concerned about educating children.
Next take a look at all the unions supporting OWS.
So are you making the claim that OWS and any money they raise is going to union bosses? I fail to see the connection, but you need to clearly state what you are implying.
Let's also not forget that OWS is raising money so where is that going?
Originally posted by Phantom28804
reply to post by NeverForget
I just have to wonder if you all even read what the people post on here about this stuff, or if you just see OWS and start to mouth off? The best part is that I found a dude selling t-shirts, pipes, and other accessories right in the middle of the Occupy movement in my time complete with "We are the 99%" sign plastered to the front of his table. So while he was bad mouthing capitalism he is participating in it and making a nice profit for himself I am sure.
Originally posted by NeverForget
Originally posted by Phantom28804
reply to post by NeverForget
I just have to wonder if you all even read what the people post on here about this stuff, or if you just see OWS and start to mouth off? The best part is that I found a dude selling t-shirts, pipes, and other accessories right in the middle of the Occupy movement in my time complete with "We are the 99%" sign plastered to the front of his table. So while he was bad mouthing capitalism he is participating in it and making a nice profit for himself I am sure.
.....Implying the OWS is about boycotting capitalism... how naive. Selling t-shirts, pipes, and other accessories? What a corporate whore! How dare he rip 99% of the populus off with his corrupt shenanigans!
Enjoy your butthurt.
Originally posted by NeverForget
reply to post by beezzer
Ending capitalism or corporate greed and corruption?
Originally posted by NeverForget
post removed by staff