I don't want a bunker...

...I'd like one of these instead:

US Submarines

Hell I'd move in to one of these right now if I could afford it. =D

Sorry if this is the wrong Forum. I hardly ever post and can never decide where things belong. lol

Rev

reply to post by revmoofoo
No. Let me be clear - HELL no.

I honestly don't even like the idea of being in a vessel too far from shore, let alone having the added problem of being under thousands of tons of water if something goes wrong.

Pass, thanks.

I suppose if I lived in a coastal region, a submarine would be a smart way to go.

However, I'm over 500 miles from the coast, and 4000 ft. in elevation, so I'll stick with my bunker!

Interesting idea, though.

Those are good as long as nothing modifies the water structure a lil causing the buoyancy range to adjust as well. Cool toy for those who can afford them though. of the sea and land* command

It must be nice to already be in a luxurious coffin awaiting watery death.
Not even a bunker could save you from a comet impact or a very large meteorite, hell, if all nukes were deployed no one would survive, humanity has more than 10 thousand nukes combines waiting to go off, not to mention the nuclear plants, and the super volcanoes...

Its a fickle dream that of surviving already buried in a tomb...
but anything can happen...

I sure wanted one of these. If i have to be encased in a metal case to survive doomsday i at least want one in which i am still mobile. In a bunker i would be stuck in one place while with the submarine i could check other places to see if theres a better chance survive.

reply to post by roswell1987


That was my thoughts exactly.

Rev