Help ATS with a contribution via PayPal:
learn more

MARINES TO OAKLAND POLICE: 'You Did This To My Brother'

page: 9
202
<< 6  7  8    10  11  12 >>

log in

join

posted on Oct, 28 2011 @ 11:50 AM
link   
This looks like overhead video of the incident





posted on Oct, 28 2011 @ 11:52 AM
link   
reply to post by Flavian
 




Yes according to my extensive research the Queen of England owns more land than any other individual on the planet.

"Are we getting back to this".............that is a deflective method of bullying.

And yes if I so chose to "get back to this" I will.



Simply do the research.

And now we're not even talking about the jewels antiques and paintings that the English common man worked and paid for.

Of course, some people don't mind being taken advantage of.

Did your daughter, son, or you have as nice a wedding as Charles & Diana, or William & Kate?

Sorry I don't buy the "Rule by sanction of God's will" frap and anyone with a thinking brain should have rebelled on that one a long time ago.

“Man will never be free until the last king is strangled with the entrails of the last priest.”
― Denis Diderot



By
Michelle Van Loon - See all my reviews
This review is from: Who Owns the World: The Surprising Truth About Every Piece of Land on the Planet (Paperback)
Who Owns The World? The Surprising Truth About Every Piece of Land on The Planet is an encyclopedic accounting of land ownership on our globe. It is packed with fascinating facts: Did you know that Queen Elizabeth owns 1/6th of all the land on earth? Did you know that the largest private landowner in the U.S. is Ted Turner, who owns 1,800,000 acres of land? (Yes, all those zeroes belong in that number.) Have you ever heard of the British Indian Ocean Territory, a land area of 14,720 acres which is now believed to be used as a prison for those captured in the war on terror?

Though most of the 369-page paperback is devoted to information about who controls every square inch of land, authors Kevin Cahill and Rob McMahon explain their purpose in putting this book together:
This book asserts that the main cause of most remaining poverty in the world is an excess of landownership in too few hands. This book will also assert that private ownership of a very small amount on land - one-tenth of an urban acre or an acre or two of rural land - granted to every person on the planet has the potential to, and, I believe, begin ending poverty on a global basis. The book will go further and reassert that the right to the direct ownership of land is a fundamental human right.

After a 60-page introduction that unpacks these assertions, the remainder of the book surveys every country of the world, giving information about population, size, gross national income, percentage of land held by private owners, a line or two about the country's history, and an explanation of how the country is owned.

The book doesn't offer solutions to the inequalities presented in the book (a handful of kings, queens, sheiks, religious institutions and individuals control most of the land on earth) or do much to tackle the dicey issues of political and/or ethnic identity that have shaped most modern nation-states. But then again, it isn't meant to do so. Who Owns The World? tells a compelling, unsettling story with stats, and is an interesting reference tool for students and those

Credit and source: Michelle Van Loon www.amazon.com...


And yes Her RH owns 1/6 th of all the land on the planet. Fact - look it up. She's also been buying up a lot of land around Denver Airport. If you drive by Denver Airport you will see tons and tons and tons of dirt and rock excavated which is another entire conspiracy in and of itself.

All you need to do is research which it is evident you have not looked into this as deeply as possible.


edit on 28-10-2011 by ofhumandescent because: (no reason given)



posted on Oct, 28 2011 @ 12:19 PM
link   

Originally posted by popsmayhem
He survived two tours in Iraq
facing more then a little flash bang.

This ain't nothing.


Obviously not, seeing as this landed him a hospital. Are you really this daft?



posted on Oct, 28 2011 @ 12:25 PM
link   
reply to post by 0zzymand0s
 



ATS needs a "hell yea" button

Well put.

They write the tax code for us to obey and them to evade.

Now they have pissed off a bunch of Marines. I love seeing the armed forces stand up for the people. It gives me some hope that not all is already lost.
edit on 28-10-2011 by sageofmonticello because: eta



posted on Oct, 28 2011 @ 02:03 PM
link   
this just proved it once an for all, You can say what you want about the military, US army, the FED, and even our president, BUT YOU DO NOT EVER # WITH A MARINE



posted on Oct, 28 2011 @ 02:23 PM
link   

Originally posted by KingAtlas
The more I read about this, the more I feel the actual importance of this one man and the symbolism he represents.

This was one occurence I am sure no one thought of when this all began to play out.

What happened to this one man could very well change the results of this whole movement.

I now truly believe that when we look back, as informed people, we will remember what one thing changed the event from being almost dismissed and ridiculed to being taken very seriously.

The Scott Olsen incident will go down in history, and one day we may be telling the young people what happened, and that we lived it.
edit on 27-10-2011 by KingAtlas because: G&S



I totally agree.

Its funny how historians say it only takes one bullet to change the world. This is how wars start.

This is how the FIRST american revolution started. When British Red Coats fired upon an unarmed colonist in Boston.

Wouldnt it be interesting if the SECOND American revolution all started with a RUBBER bullet of all things???
edit on 28-10-2011 by WhiteDevil013 because: (no reason given)



posted on Oct, 28 2011 @ 02:23 PM
link   
I hate to ask a big moochy favor, but could someone screen cap the overhead shot of the tear gas dispersal video and red circle the area where Mr. Olson was hit?
My original thought was to post a screen cap of the video myself to have others circle it, but I don't know where in the street he got hit?



posted on Oct, 28 2011 @ 02:24 PM
link   
reply to post by Jason88
 


Although I do not agree with Occupy Wall Street whole heartily, I agree with you. If there is ever a time or place when that call is made; many more Honorable Veterans will heed the call. I do solemnly swear that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same. From one to another, civi's don't understand who we fight for when it is all on the line; each other.

29INFDIV



posted on Oct, 28 2011 @ 02:31 PM
link   
My stepbrother is a marine. He is a mild mannered, caring person. He loves children and animals. I have never seen him get out of control or be violent. Except one time. We were in a bar and some drunk A-Hole started to pick on me. My brother was calm at first and tried to talk the guy down. The drunk decided to get physical with my brother. My brother told me to start for the door. As we were walking away the drunk tried to hit him. I did not see exactly what had happened because I was headed outside. But I heard from others in the bar that nite, all they saw was one minute the drunk was standing in one place and the next he was laying in a heap across the room.
Moral of the story: Don't mess with a marine. They take care of there own.

Whoever is responsible for this poor guy being hurt, I wouldn't want to be that individual.



posted on Oct, 28 2011 @ 02:43 PM
link   

Originally posted by 29INFDIV
From one to another, civi's don't understand who we fight for when it is all on the line; each other.

29INFDIV


This.

All these claims of "the military fighting for the people", while technically true, may come as a rude awakening.

In this case, they are irate over a fallen Brother, not "the people" or even the minute OWS segment of "the people".

Those People who put him in the line of fire, made a martyr of him, then exploited the outcome for their own agenda may be in for a VERY rude awakening.

When the military fights "for the people", they fight for ALL of them, not just the OWS. Claiming some mythical "99%" in an effort to co-opt more numbers into their ranks on paper won't cut it.

OWS and handlers: Keep on putting the totality of The People at risk, and you'll soon find out where the "99%" really IS.



posted on Oct, 28 2011 @ 03:01 PM
link   
reply to post by nenothtu
 


I'm glad you get it, people are deluded to think otherwise.

29INFDIV



posted on Oct, 28 2011 @ 03:06 PM
link   
reply to post by TheCounselor
 


Sorry, found a good video youtu.be...
edit on 28-10-2011 by TheCounselor because: (no reason given)

I'm amazed to see people pick up the smoke containers and toss them back over the line. Some look like they didn't flash explode yet before the people rush at them to toss them back.
edit on 28-10-2011 by TheCounselor because: Amazement at Smoke Bomb retoss.



posted on Oct, 28 2011 @ 03:28 PM
link   
We are now past the point of TYRANNY and it is clear that We The People are at war with a gov't of criminals who are violating our God Given and Constitutional Rights to Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Happiness.

Notice to the elite tyrannical criminal rulers.... you must vacate the nation immediately! Pack your bags and be on your way, you may not get another notice.



posted on Oct, 28 2011 @ 04:12 PM
link   
I am Out Rages as well i would see that officer or sue the state for this this is what i mean. Its our time to revolt this year has been the year Revolutions know as the Arabian Spring its out time to have a American revolution this time to remove the government and get back to the Constitution because this is totally violating so many rights



posted on Oct, 28 2011 @ 04:18 PM
link   

Originally posted by TheCounselor
reply to post by TheCounselor
 


Sorry, found a good video youtu.be...
edit on 28-10-2011 by TheCounselor because: (no reason given)

I'm amazed to see people pick up the smoke containers and toss them back over the line. Some look like they didn't flash explode yet before the people rush at them to toss them back.
edit on 28-10-2011 by TheCounselor because: Amazement at Smoke Bomb retoss.


Those are teargas canisters, not flashbangs. You can find pictures of the kids at Kent State doing the same thing - throwing teargas canisters back at the national Guard troops - before they got fired into. That was way back in '70 or '71, so it's not a new thing.

Just so you'll know - the proper way to return a grenade to sender is to kick the crap out of it, not pick it up and hold it in your hand to toss it like you're at a Little League game. Your objective is to minimize your contact time, just in case it picks that time to explode. that's not the time you want to be caressing it in your hand.



posted on Oct, 28 2011 @ 04:21 PM
link   
Good post!
I did the Marine training course in Lympstone, England,; tough S.O.B.'s
All i can say is.....watch out, Oakland cops



posted on Oct, 28 2011 @ 04:22 PM
link   
reply to post by ofhumandescent
 


I think (sir) Paul Mcartney has more than that!



posted on Oct, 28 2011 @ 04:25 PM
link   

Originally posted by SecondAmendmentUser

Notice to the elite tyrannical criminal rulers.... you must vacate the nation immediately! Pack your bags and be on your way, you may not get another notice.



Notice to the wannabe elitist would-be tyrants who want to take over where their "enemies" left off: if you continue to put my People at risk and keep trying to draw them into YOUR crossfire, you would do well to heed your own advice.

We are not amused, and aren't very generous with OUR "notices", either.

Fight yer own damned battles, and leave the rest us alone. We're not human shields for you.



posted on Oct, 28 2011 @ 04:32 PM
link   
Ammm.. Where the police aiming at this marines head.
Where they aiming at anyones head.
Why are marines upset at one of their own get hit in the head but not those two girls get hit in the head ..that video is all over the net..

Bunch of hypocritical fools...



posted on Oct, 28 2011 @ 04:37 PM
link   

Originally posted by Whateva69
OK let’s put it this way for you. You have a few hundred people sitting around quietly protesting in the park.
What are you gonna do? Gas them out and then let them move into the streets?


Except they weren't a few hundred people just sitting around quietly protesting. The "peaceful" OWS protesters are the ones who incited the violence; the tear-gas and rubber bullets were a response to OWS violence.

www.youtube.com...

Here, OWS Oakland admits they started the violence.

There is something revolting going on here, we are being manipulated. The injured Marine is both victim and pawn, being used to manipulate us by the same people who are lying, who are telling us OWS is "peaceful" and that it is about standing up for our freedoms. And it is easy to see many here have fallen for it.





new topics

top topics



 
202
<< 6  7  8    10  11  12 >>

log in

join