Lunar photo-enhancements reveal alien civilization evidence., page 26
Pages: <<  23    24    25    26  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 19 times


reply posted on 12-12-2011 @ 02:50 PM by dcmb1409
36 pages of nothing but boulders and boulder tracks, many from people whose job it is to study this phenomenon. lots of pictures and input on boulders and trails.

source:
forum.moonzoo.org...

and a cool tool from the LRO site

source: target.lroc.asu.edu...

an article on boulders and trails.

Boulders that have rolled down hillsides from crater walls, or massifs like the Apollo 17 landing site, provide samples of geologic units that may be high up a hillside and thus difficult to access otherwise by a rover or a manned crew vehicle.


source: www.universetoday.com...

boulders and trails are common all over the moon.


reply posted on 12-12-2011 @ 03:39 PM by ProudBird
reply to post by mcrom901



Whilst I see the attempt at relevance, once one looks at that link to the Wikipedia article (a fascinating bit, of course)....there are abrupt dissimilarities, sorry.

The Lunar surface images that are presented as the heart of these examples? They are clearly evidence of large (or "largish") blocks and boulders that have, at some point in the past (and, on the Moon this could have been 1,000 years ago, or 1,000,000 or even a Billion years in the past)......rocks that have tumbled down some inclines, after having been dislodged by natural processes.

The lack of atmosphere on the Moon accounts for the lack of typical "erosion" that we here on Earth are familiar with.

Things are different on a "alien".world, indisputably........



reply posted on 12-12-2011 @ 03:50 PM by zatara
reply to post by arianna



It is a fact that there is a history of dishonesty and corrupcy in the highest offices of the US government. Think Nixon and Clinton. They lie to all americans on national TV and hope that their lie will never surface and get away with it. You should not think too much about the stuff they did get away with.

Now I ask you......can you belief unconditionally what a government official or a spokesman of a government agency tell you...?

If someone answer this question with yes.....he or she is naive, ignorant, an idiot or a lier.

The whole Apollo Moonlanding has too many questions on too many subjects which relate to the question if there was a landing or not. If there were a few discrapancies you could say.."okay, looks weird ....but can happen". But there are just too many questions......

It is a bit like JFK's magic bullit theory. Government insiders try to sell the citizens some exotic theory in order to make the difficult questions go away. And there is always some lame scientist who will do what he is told to do.

Like Mulder says..."I want to believe".....but unfortunately I just can not, and neither should anyone. (That there is nothing to see on the moon )

edit on 12/12/2011 by zatara because: (no reason given)



reply posted on 14-12-2011 @ 06:52 AM by wmd_2008
reply to post by arianna



Seems to me you are avoiding the shadow question yet again arianna I wonder why


reply posted on 14-12-2011 @ 11:32 AM by dcmb1409
reply to post by arianna



Some sites you will have to search and some are evident. Just a few on a quick search.

www.niutoday.info...
Note in the above image Rowland crater and plains are in darkness.


Russian images:

source: www.mentallandscape.com...

Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency

Source: www.jaxa.jp...

and a few others:

4.bp.blogspot.com...


www.naveenjain.biz...

lroc.sese.asu.edu...

blogs.nasa.gov...
edit on 14-12-2011 by dcmb1409 because: (no reason given)



reply posted on 14-12-2011 @ 12:33 PM by arianna
Originally posted by wmd_2008
reply to
post by arianna



Seems to me you are avoiding the shadow question yet again arianna I wonder why


The reason the shadows are not being considered at the moment is because the number and shapes of the surface objects is more important.


reply posted on 14-12-2011 @ 12:39 PM by wmd_2008
Originally posted by arianna
Originally posted by wmd_2008
reply to
post by arianna



Seems to me you are avoiding the shadow question yet again arianna I wonder why


The reason the shadows are not being considered at the moment is because the number and shapes of the surface objects is more important.


Well you dont seem to be answering the question on the other thread do YOU!


reply posted on 14-12-2011 @ 02:20 PM by arianna
Originally posted by wmd_2008
Originally posted by arianna
Originally posted by wmd_2008
reply to
post by arianna



Seems to me you are avoiding the shadow question yet again arianna I wonder why


The reason the shadows are not being considered at the moment is because the number and shapes of the surface objects is more important.


Well you dont seem to be answering the question on the other thread do YOU!


I have just answered your question on the other thread.
Pages: <<  23    24    25    26  >>    ^^TOP^^



Ooparts and Ancient aliens
  Posted 3 days ago with 57 member flags
Bad Ufologists-Lets clean the closet of any skeletons
  Posted 11 days ago with 52 member flags
Death by UFO!
  Posted 17 days ago with 49 member flags
UFOs during Satellite launch
  Posted 11 days ago with 49 member flags
Tracey Taylor - "Aliens Gave Me a Special Gift"
  Posted 10 days ago with 31 member flags
DIVINE INTERVENTION: ETs Defeating Old World Order
  Posted 18 days ago with 29 member flags