Lunar photo-enhancements reveal alien civilization evidence.

page: 25
19
<< 22  23  24    26 >>

log in

join

posted on Dec, 11 2011 @ 03:46 PM
link   

Originally posted by arianna
The group of structures is rectangled in red and what could possibly be a water tower in yellow.
Thanks.


I could see what you meant by "structures" (as I said before, I think I have identified the type of "feature" that you call "structures"), but I couldn't find the "tower", and now I know why: you said it was to the right but it's to the left.




posted on Dec, 11 2011 @ 04:02 PM
link   

Originally posted by ArMaP

Originally posted by arianna
The group of structures is rectangled in red and what could possibly be a water tower in yellow.
Thanks.


I could see what you meant by "structures" (as I said before, I think I have identified the type of "feature" that you call "structures"), but I couldn't find the "tower", and now I know why: you said it was to the right but it's to the left.


Apologies, that was a slip-up on my part.



posted on Dec, 11 2011 @ 04:13 PM
link   
Many people are of the opinion that no aliens or anyone else is on the Moon.

If that's the case, who could have possibly built the structures showing in this pseudo 3D view? Humans!




Direct view. i985.photobucket.com...



posted on Dec, 11 2011 @ 04:14 PM
link   
reply to post by ProudBird
 


In fact, there are four light sources for the shadows we see (including the fake light sources to create the fake shadows).

1 - Shadows on the house
2 - Shadow of the boy on the ground
3 - Shadow of the man
4 - Shadow of the boy hanging onto the hoop


The boy even has two different light sources, when he is on the ground and when he is jumping or hanging onto the hoop.


Sorry everybody for the little sidetracking.



posted on Dec, 11 2011 @ 04:16 PM
link   

Originally posted by arianna
I have not seen 'roadways' in the images but the viewpoint is quite a distance above the surface.
At 0.6 metres per pixel, anything with at least 0.6 metres will appear as a dot (or a line, in something like a roadway), and things with more than 1.8 metres will show their shape, obviously closer to the real shape for larger objects.



posted on Dec, 11 2011 @ 04:19 PM
link   
Sorry, but this is what I see in the image. Craters and rocks minus the moon buggy and astronaut.


[img][/img]

But that is IMO. I'm cross-eyed looking at the images with no firm belief in made structures from the data supplied.



posted on Dec, 11 2011 @ 04:21 PM
link   
The distance to moon is only 239000 miles.

We have sent probes up there for ages, not only we, the US, EU, JP, China.

We have imaged the moon back and forth, in HD resolution down to centimeters resolution, and a 6 year old kid can go on websites like NASA or Google and examine every inch of the moon surface.

Instead of an endless debate trying to understand what you see and why you interpret subjective "structures" as obviously being real..explain please:

* Why it would be the case there are "structures", building, towers etc. on the moon but there is only a handful of people who "see" them while the rest, including all scientists and imaging experts don't?

* If it were the case there are structures and buildings etc...how they managed it to hide this on a global scale, i am talking about China, US, Europe, Japan, Russia would all know about those structures but "miraculously" in a never before seen precedence are united to keep this a secret?

* if there was structures, buildings etc.. why would they not simply have announced it upon discovery? I mean we are spending billions on space programs to discover all kinds of stuff, we send a new lab up to mars to learn whether there once was (or still is) life....but then would hide any such discovery?



posted on Dec, 11 2011 @ 04:22 PM
link   

Originally posted by arianna
If you had looked carefully you would see that there is a tall tower rising above the other structures which is not casting a shadow.
Do you have any explanation for a shadowless tower?



posted on Dec, 11 2011 @ 04:32 PM
link   
reply to post by ArMaP
 


THAT is my point.

and THANK you for showing the specifics, in that video.

It is clear to all.



posted on Dec, 11 2011 @ 05:11 PM
link   

Originally posted by ArMaP

Originally posted by arianna
If you had looked carefully you would see that there is a tall tower rising above the other structures which is not casting a shadow.
Do you have any explanation for a shadowless tower?


Yes, I have an explanaton why no shadow is seen. I have examined the object in the 3D view. There are shadows being cast by some of the objects but the shadow cast by the tall tower cannot be seen due to being shielded by a row of structures a short distance away.



posted on Dec, 11 2011 @ 06:15 PM
link   
reply to post by arianna
 


Sorry, I don't understand it. How can a shadow be "shielded"?

A shadow is always project onto something, it cannot be "shielded".



posted on Dec, 11 2011 @ 06:30 PM
link   
reply to post by ArMaP
 



Seriously.....you have zeroed in...
BRILLIANT eye, well spotted!!!!



posted on Dec, 12 2011 @ 02:00 AM
link   

Originally posted by ArMaP
reply to post by arianna
 


Sorry, I don't understand it. How can a shadow be "shielded"?

A shadow is always project onto something, it cannot be "shielded".


A possible reason why a shadow cannot be seen is because it is being shielded from our view by a row of tall structures slightly to the right of the tower. As a matter of interest this particular section is a crop from the full image which was rotated 30 degrees to the left to produce an oblique view of the surface objects.



posted on Dec, 12 2011 @ 02:10 AM
link   

Originally posted by arianna

Originally posted by ArMaP
reply to post by arianna
 


Sorry, I don't understand it. How can a shadow be "shielded"?

A shadow is always project onto something, it cannot be "shielded".


A possible reason why a shadow cannot be seen is because it is being shielded from our view by a row of tall structures slightly to the right of the tower. As a matter of interest this particular section is a crop from the full image which was rotated 30 degrees to the left to produce an oblique view of the surface objects.


Then the tall structures would create a shadow
You are stuck admit it!



posted on Dec, 12 2011 @ 02:35 AM
link   
reply to post by ShortMemory
 


In my ignorance, can someone please explain why when we look at the moon from earth we see different shades?

The craters obviously cast shadows, so that's somewhat explainable, but I don't understand why if the moon is made of the same material across its surface, that at such a distance, we see different shapes and shades. Surely, at that range the suns illumination would show us here on earth a white/grey sphere of one colour?
Wouldn't detail like that only appear when close up, caused by shadows? The craters and hills aren't that big that they cast massive shadows across the surface? I'm confused?



posted on Dec, 12 2011 @ 02:59 AM
link   
reply to post by arianna
 


I've looked at the tracks in your image and they all stop at a rock, which seems to imply the rock rolled????

How the hell can that happen? Some of these rolling rocks travel through craters, so go down a slope and up the other side? That shows they were travelling with some force / speed?

Can anyone explain that?

If you can't spot them, zoom the image to max and go to the bottom right hand side and scroll up
wms.lroc.asu.edu...



posted on Dec, 12 2011 @ 03:11 AM
link   
If any members are interested, here is a pseudo 3D version of the full image from which the above section was cropped. This view is not rotated. The 'group of structures' and the 'water tower' object shown in the rotated crop can be seen to the upper right in this image but they will appear as if they have turned sideways.

If you are viewing using Internet Explorer, download the image from the direct view link, open window to full screen and zoom in (125%) to preview the surface features.




Direct view. i985.photobucket.com...
edit on 12-12-2011 by arianna because: (no reason given)



posted on Dec, 12 2011 @ 03:47 AM
link   

Originally posted by ckitch
How the hell can that happen? Some of these rolling rocks travel through craters, so go down a slope and up the other side? That shows they were travelling with some force / speed?


could it be that the trails were there prior to the impact craters?

edit on 12/12/11 by mcrom901 because: (no reason given)



posted on Dec, 12 2011 @ 04:22 AM
link   

Originally posted by mcrom901

Originally posted by ckitch
How the hell can that happen? Some of these rolling rocks travel through craters, so go down a slope and up the other side? That shows they were travelling with some force / speed?


could it be that the trails were there prior to the impact craters?

edit on 12/12/11 by mcrom901 because: (no reason given)



This is what the thread is all about - 'boulders and boulder trails'. The description with the main image strip tells us this and from a great distance the objects do appear to be exactly that. It is only when a close-view image is captured and enhanced that something else is being revealed. The enhanced images are showing that they are definitely not boulders or boulder trails but built structures.



posted on Dec, 12 2011 @ 04:59 AM
link   
Here is a sketch I found of what some of the structures look like in the above images.

Some near-east civilizations during biblical times used to build their dwellings in this manner and some of the structures showing in the images appear to have very similar design.







new topics
 
19
<< 22  23  24    26 >>

log in

join