It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by amfis
Originally posted by jpvskyfreak
I've zoomed the image on one of the small buildings ....
The building has 6 sides (Hexagon) and around the base of the building it seems to be uniformly cleared around the perimeter.
img820.imageshack.us...
Image Inverted
img638.imageshack.us...[edi tby]edit on 27-10-2011 by jpvskyfreak because: Added inverted image to the post
Originally posted by loves a conspiricy
reply to post by arianna
I really dont see what you are looking at in any of the pics.
Just look like rock formations to me.
Originally posted by arianna
The original image gives the impression that what is described in the caption is correct
Originally posted by arianna
but from observing the enhancements I have made it can be seen that when viewing the enhanced images the description is not correct .
Originally posted by TheOven
Is there any proof that excerpt from the NASA transcript is real?
Originally posted by Violence
Maybe I need glasses, but where the hell is this "evidence".
Don't people know what they're doing when they post this stuff?
Originally posted by arianna
As many of the features on the surface are small you have to concentrate on the view for a while before they start to become apparent.
There's where the problems start, the enhancements enhance some parts of the image and hide others, so while some things may become more visible, some disappear.
Originally posted by arianna
A degree of controlled enhancement was applied to the original image to see if there was anything else on the surface. You may be surprised at what the enhancement revealed.
Or enhancement artefacts...
The intermediate enhancement starts to reveal some surface features.
i985.photobucket.com...
No scientist will confirma or validate what can be observed in that image because you were the one creating the image, although it was originally based on a real (as far as I know) photo.
The full enhancement. (No scientist will confirm or validate what can be observed in this image.)
i985.photobucket.com...
No, just some people that think that by applying filters to an image can extract information that was not there in the first place.
Do you think a global conspiracy exists by the scientific and educatonal establishments to suppress important information as to what is really on the lunar surface?
The track is carved into the ground, so does that mean that the "buildings" are holes instead of buildings?
I am sure that what can be observed are buildings that have been constructed on the surface to give the appearance of rolling boulders that have left a trail. The "dash" effect in reality is many long buildings constructed in a line to give the impression that when viewed from a distance above the surface appear as being a bouncing boulder trail. It would appear that some very clever thinking has been at work in designing the lunar landscape.
According to the information for that image, the photo was taken at an altitude of 61.48 km.
As a matter of interest I estimate the viewpoint above the surface to be approximately 750 - 1000 meters but I cannot be absolutely sure of this.
Originally posted by arianna
There is no way I can accept the caption which describes the "dashed trail" as being caused by a rolling boulder. Also, what is described as being boulders are in fact structures of varying size.