like everyone here i dont know what we're supposed to see in the photo's.
if the op was here we'd all be enlightened and a good debate could ensue.
why post a thread and then leave???
grrrrrrrrr


Originally posted by amfis
Originally posted by jpvskyfreak
I've zoomed the image on one of the small buildings ....
The building has 6 sides (Hexagon) and around the base of the building it seems to be uniformly cleared around the perimeter.
img820.imageshack.us...
Image Inverted
img638.imageshack.us...[edi tby]edit on 27-10-2011 by jpvskyfreak because: Added inverted image to the post
Originally posted by loves a conspiricy
reply to post by arianna
I really dont see what you are looking at in any of the pics.![]()
Just look like rock formations to me.
Originally posted by TheOven
Is there any proof that excerpt from the NASA transcript is real?
Originally posted by ariannaThere's where the problems start, the enhancements enhance some parts of the image and hide others, so while some things may become more visible, some disappear.
A degree of controlled enhancement was applied to the original image to see if there was anything else on the surface. You may be surprised at what the enhancement revealed.
The intermediate enhancement starts to reveal some surface features.Or enhancement artefacts...
i985.photobucket.com...
The full enhancement. (No scientist will confirm or validate what can be observed in this image.)No scientist will confirma or validate what can be observed in that image because you were the one creating the image, although it was originally based on a real (as far as I know) photo.
i985.photobucket.com...
Do you think a global conspiracy exists by the scientific and educatonal establishments to suppress important information as to what is really on the lunar surface?No, just some people that think that by applying filters to an image can extract information that was not there in the first place.
I am sure that what can be observed are buildings that have been constructed on the surface to give the appearance of rolling boulders that have left a trail. The "dash" effect in reality is many long buildings constructed in a line to give the impression that when viewed from a distance above the surface appear as being a bouncing boulder trail. It would appear that some very clever thinking has been at work in designing the lunar landscape.The track is carved into the ground, so does that mean that the "buildings" are holes instead of buildings?
As a matter of interest I estimate the viewpoint above the surface to be approximately 750 - 1000 meters but I cannot be absolutely sure of this.According to the information for that image, the photo was taken at an altitude of 61.48 km.