Originally posted by ProudBird
reply to post by Swills

---

He used some bad ass software, AMS auto multi layer segmentation software, on these photos, and most of, if not all of us do not have access to such software.

Oh....how "convenient" for the OP.


Now then....who can tell us what kind of image manipulation software was available in 1969, 1970, 1971.....etc?

Surely, for any organization committed to *hiding evidence* from Apollo photos that date from the actual historical records and time-frame, they would have had to have very sophisticated computer processing abilities in the 1970s?? I seem to have miss that tidbit from the historical records of the era.

Imagine the immense *team* that wold need to be employed to do this, building a computer that didn't yet exist, writing software that was still a dream for Gates and Wozniak and Jobs.....et al.

Wow! What skilled and genius professionals, hiding all those skills for so many decades.

Originally posted by ProudBird
reply to post by Swills

---

He used some bad ass software, AMS auto multi layer segmentation software, on these photos, and most of, if not all of us do not have access to such software.

Oh....how "convenient" for the OP.


Now then....who can tell us what kind of image manipulation software was available in 1969, 1970, 1971.....etc?

Surely, for any organization committed to *hiding evidence* from Apollo photos that date from the actual historical records and time-frame, they would have had to have very sophisticated computer processing abilities in the 1970s?? I seem to have miss that tidbit from the historical records of the era.

Imagine the immense *team* that wold need to be employed to do this, building a computer that didn't yet exist, writing software that was still a dream for Gates and Wozniak and Jobs.....et al.

Wow! What skilled and genius professionals, hiding all those skills for so many decades.

Originally posted by Swills
reply to post by ProudBird

---

Of course running the same software with the same photos by a different party is the way to verify his findings. Thing is, he didn't use any old photo software to check these photos out. He used some bad ass software, AMS auto multi layer segmentation software, on these photos, and most of, if not all of us do not have access to such software. Although, this is ATS and all, I'm sure someone out there may have access to similar software or the like. Hopefully they'll find this thread.

edit on 26-10-2011 by Swills because: (no reason given)

Originally posted by Pinke

Originally posted by Swills
reply to post by ProudBird

---

Of course running the same software with the same photos by a different party is the way to verify his findings. Thing is, he didn't use any old photo software to check these photos out. He used some bad ass software, AMS auto multi layer segmentation software, on these photos, and most of, if not all of us do not have access to such software. Although, this is ATS and all, I'm sure someone out there may have access to similar software or the like. Hopefully they'll find this thread.

edit on 26-10-2011 by Swills because: (no reason given)

I haven't looked at the video but ...

It doesn't really matter what software the OP is using. A low band pass in Matlab is the same as low band pass done using C++ or Photoshop (if done correctly) or any other image editing app or language that can do image engineer operations.

If the OP provided the methods and functions used etc ... persons could replicate the results in a large number of applications of their choosing. Without that information it's all a bit of anomalous guess work.

P.S - a lot of the 'high end' or 'bad ass' applications actually specifically log this information so it can be exported when used correctly!

edit on 26-10-2011 by Pinke because: PS

Originally posted by Gridrebel
reply to post by amongus

---

Like the OP said, the software he was using is not cheap. I'm pretty sure the software would cost several thousand dollars. It's not a free for all or anything like photoshop. Maybe he the OP could identify the name of the software again for those who missed it in the video. Then the doubters could purchase the software, obtain original NASA photos and try this disclosure technique for themselves.

Originally posted by Swills
reply to post by ProudBird

---

Of course running the same software with the same photos by a different party is the way to verify his findings. Thing is, he didn't use any old photo software to check these photos out. He used some bad ass software, AMS auto multi layer segmentation software, on these photos, and most of, if not all of us do not have access to such software. Although, this is ATS and all, I'm sure someone out there may have access to similar software or the like. Hopefully they'll find this thread.

On a side note, do yourselves a favor and check out his other videos!

Hi there! Perhaps my eyes are playing tricks on me but I really thought to have seen spacecritters flying and crawling around INSIDE the ISS! Do we have alien lifeforms / critters visiting the ISS? Why don't you take a peek and convince yourselves. As soon as the astronaut has disappeared the show starts.

YouTube Link

edit on 26-10-2011 by Swills because: (no reason given)