It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by aivlas
reply to post by Ha`la`tha
Your going to do that, how excactly?
you don't need any info on these people neither do the vigilantes out there, already been a fake accusation of a user.
To explain how popular this community of pedophiles is. The total page views of the Hidden Wiki 'Hard Candy' section as of October 20th, 2011 is a total 2,055,701. The total view count of main index (non-pedophilia content) of The Hidden Wiki was 2,677,430 time.
Think that says it alledit on 24-10-2011 by aivlas because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by Afterthought
reply to post by Master_007
C'mon now.
It's OK to be cynical sometimes, but even in prison, pedos are way way way below drug pushers and other criminals. They're even one rung under rapists.
At the very least, an investigation needs to be conducted and the people outed should be scrutinized.
These types of offenses should never be brushed under the rug or shrugged off.
Originally posted by Master_007
Wait a second !
Tor, networks, privacy and pedophiles
Think i've read this book before and next it will be drugs, terrorists and the usual bull# just like we have seen before and used against the internet in general.
Maybe my name will be on the list of perverts because i go against the state and all released by a source who no one is able to track.
It's Google and it's HTTPS you need to be watching
Sorry mate but i'm not buying it but more than likly posted in good faith
Now that they were warned?
Originally posted by Raist
Hopefully those abusing children will be brought to some form of justice over this.
Do you think that evidence provided by a criminal organisation will be credible in a court?
Originally posted by AzureSky
Thats a valid point, But they obviously have backups. Lol, so the evidence would still be there.
Originally posted by ArMaP
Do you think that evidence provided by a criminal organisation will be credible in a court?
Originally posted by AzureSky
Thats a valid point, But they obviously have backups. Lol, so the evidence would still be there.
Issue 2: th3j35t3r
---
A person who had been working with #OpDarknet created an account with this name and used it to infiltrate "Lolita City" the reasoning this person had behind using the name th3j35t3r we do not know, but this person is no longer part of #OpDarknet.
---
Issue 3: joepie91
---
The same person mentioned above provided the d0xing on the "Lolita City" user "svet28" after being asked to further investigate, we have redone the d0xing and come to the conclusion that this ID DOES NOT belong to joepie91, and joepie91 does not have an account on "Lolita City"