Very interesting post.

While they haven't actually done anything specifically new on an individual process basis, they have packaged a range of existing techniques with easy to use interfaces, which brings the the skill more in reach of the amateur user, and requires less expertise knowledge. It will be interesting to see how this is released, whether it is bought by a company like Autodesk or Adobe or released as a plugin for a range of existing modelling or graphic software.

My bet is Google will buy it and integrate it into Sketchup, in fact the interface looks very similar to some of the existing camera-match tools in Sketchup or 3Ds Max and it wouldn't surprise me if they used someting like Ruby or Maxscript to code it (probably Max, as the Torus knot and the Teapot are classic Max standards).

Can't wait to play with this!

Big deal. Like it takes high grade GCI to fool your average tin foil hate wearing UFO enthusiast anyway. It will take WAY more than a picture (under the right circumstances) and video to fool anyone with half a brain anyway. You all are worried about nothing.

The only thing stuff like this does is makes is look bad because of fakes, but that is the least of our worries. We look bad because we act like utter, ignorant fools not because of fake pictures and videos.

unfortunately it was already easy to begin with. the only ones caught were the ones who took 5 minutes to make it and it looks like it was pasted in from mspaint. I wonder how many times we were duped. oh well

It's pretty good, but to be honest a picture/video of a UFO just can't be taken as evidence at all any more, or well to begin with even.

When the footage of the Temple Mount ufos came out I thought they were pretty good, at least the first and third ones, but the second one being so obviously fake really helped to discredit the others, that and I remember some people on here giving reason as to why they were fake anyway.