Luciferians control our Reality Matrix by presiding over Scientific Orthodoxy

page: 1
45
<<   2  3  4 >>

log in

join
+21 more 
posted on Oct, 24 2011 @ 04:58 AM
link   
This man as President of all the Presidents of each Scientific Field, is a militant proponent of Lucifer.


Minute 1:05

"Let me begin on April 28th, 2004, that's where The Lucifer Effect was born. Because, I was in Washington. I belong to an organization called The Council of Scientific Society Presidents. The President of every one of the 60 major scientific societies, Chemistry, Biology, Physics, etc., etc., and Psychology, it's the only soft, soft science, meet twice a year there, and I was actually elected President of the group, so I was President of the Presidents."

At the end of this first YouTube segment of his Lucifer Effect, you will hear him say without hesitation or shame:



Minute 9:15

"The Devil proves he was right and GOD was wrong. How does he do it? He shows how easy it is to corrupt Adam and Eve. Have a little snakes, let's eat the apple. She eats the apple, she tells the guy "Hey, I ate the apple, you eat the apple too: I don't want to go down alone." And so, HE IS RIGHT! You should not honor Adam, because he is corruptible. So, that starts..."

"Part of my mission is to recover the reputation of Lucifer."

Not only does he paraphrase Eve in a very unexpected way, but he also presents himself formally as a vindicator of the much maligned Lucifer!

What is interesting about that metaphor is that it translates graphically into the opening picture of Lucifer tempting mankind with the apple in the mention by then Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld which is shown in a cartoon in the opening image of part 3:


In the above video at minute 2:55 he talks about Dr Jekyll and Mr Hyde and he goes on to how one can get a "Two for One" deal by obtaining a similar result without drugs and also getting once good people to become "Perpetrators of Evil"... it is a role you play, but what happens is that if you play it long enough, often enough, you think it is you."

In a later segment he even goes so far as to present in visual format what looks very much like a HOW TO GUIDE to bring forth Evil:


Returning to the organization which "elected" to choose this individual to preside over all its presidents, we can examine its announced purpose and objectives, which can be found on their website.

The Council of Scientific Society Presidents - The Nation's Leading Center for Development of Science Leadership and Science Policy

They clearly announce that they seek to develop "Science Leadership" and seek to centralize "Science Policy".

Yet for all intents and purposes, science is led by a quest for truth and knowledge, and not by some tentacular organization meeting twice a year in Washington D.C.? Also, the policy of science is to research, and not to be subject to centralized policy groups based in Washington.

Among their announced objectives, the following figure:


To perpetually enhance leadership skills development in the science community;

My Comments: Truth and knowledge are supposed to lead science, not the skills of a few key individuals placed in leadership positions. To seek the development of said skills implies that this organization aims to purposely orient science to fulfill an agenda other than truth and knowledge.

To develop an enduring network of past and present national leadership in science;

My Comments: They are purposely building an "Old Boy's Club" of leaders with bridges between the past hierarchs controlling scientific orthodoxy and their candidates for replacement, who are set on rails to pursue the same goals.

To provide communication and collaboration among the various scientific disciplines through the presidents of scientific societies;

My Comments: They clearly state they exist to organize all scientific bodies in a coordinated manner, the "bosses" of each discipline being channeled through this organization, with all scientists brought into cooperative synergy under the authority of their field specific presidents.

To deliberate and adopt public policy positions and act upon science research and education issues of national or international scope;

My Comments: They are gathered in order to unite their power and make them take common positions used to affect public policy, and this organization grants itself authority over research and education policy worldwide.

To develop ways to enhance the public understanding and appreciation of science;

My Comments: They are missioned to improve their own impact on the public mind, projecting a vision of reality through science, promoting it within and through their respective scientific disciplines, coordinating their broadcasts using innovative propagandist methods.


While we cannot state for certain what their Agenda is exactly, I find it eloquent that among all the scientists in the USA they chose as the leader of the leaders, for President of the Presidents, a man who whites a book featuring on its cover Lucifer adorned with an angelic Halo and who states in public:

"Part of my mission is to recover the reputation of Lucifer."

Conclude what you wish, but this does explain the stranglehold that most scientific disciplines are held in, opposing the truth in many instances and herding researchers into politically correct orientations and fencing in their conclusions, using peer reviewed publications to weed out unorthodox thinkers and preventing the advancement of science in an organized coercive manner.

It also coincides with the agenda one century ago to control information, science and education decided behind closed doors by a small group of powerful men. Incidentally I find it interesting that this was voiced at Harvard Law School where such mindsets are presumed to be normative as that institution has served, along with Yale, as a bastion of elite cattle herding. We can also note that this person is professor emeritus at Stanford, an emanation of the Tavistock Institute in its vocation to brainwash the wider population both using technology and thought control.

FWIW

Getsmart

edit on 24-10-2011 by Getsmart because: Something is SULFUROUS in the Illuminati Controlled Academic and Scientific Community




posted on Oct, 24 2011 @ 05:13 AM
link   
The devil has all the best rock n roll.
He's also got all the lawyers.

Whatever the case, there's nothing here to be worried about.



posted on Oct, 24 2011 @ 05:43 AM
link   
Exellent post star and flag.


CSSP's plenary sessions always feature prominent leaders in government, universities, academies, and industry. Its banquet is highlighted by a keynote (agency heads, distinguished scientists, top Presidential advisors, Members of Congress)


Nice club there.

Going to watch the vids now.



posted on Oct, 24 2011 @ 04:56 PM
link   
Interesting. I buy your overall thesis, but even the denier could see that in Zimbardo's case the Luciferian bias is there.

I also find it interesting that his rather diabolical Standford Prison Study was funded by the Office of Naval Research.


In 1971, Zimbardo accepted a tenured position as professor of psychology at Stanford University. With a government grant from the U.S. Office of Naval Research, he conducted the Stanford prison study in which 24 normal college students were randomly assigned to be "prisoners" or "guards" in a mock prison located in the basement of the psychology building at Stanford (three additional college students were selected as alternates, but did not participate in the study).

The two week planned study into the psychology of prison life ended only after 6 days due to emotional trauma being experienced by the participants. The students quickly began acting out their roles, with "guards" becoming sadistic and "prisoners" showing extreme passivity and depression.
en.wikipedia.org...





posted on Oct, 24 2011 @ 05:09 PM
link   
What an excellant compilation. S&F, would give you double even if it hurt.
There's sooo much to this topic it hurts. It also hurts that people don't recognize the importances ... even when they recognize the worldly importances of nwo and bilderbergers, they miss the more important spiritual aspects which actually rule the show.

On lighter notes, do you notice how much the speaker (Philip) resembles Louis Cipher, from Angelheart?
edit on 24-10-2011 by Northwarden because: (no reason given)


+9 more 
posted on Oct, 24 2011 @ 05:50 PM
link   
reply to post by Getsmart
 


And you got all of that from this one lecture? Clearly you're not familiar with Zimbardo and his work and you clearly misconstrued what he is discussing in these videos. The Lucifer Effect is Zimbardo's name for how good people can become evil through societal influences. When he talks about redeeming Lucifer's reputation, he is saying not to think of him as an innately evil creature, but one whose downfall was brought about by societal pressures. He is pretty much saying that evilness is not a hard wired characteristic and if one can go from good to evil through outside influences then the converse should also be possible.

As for the Council of Scientific Society Presidents, it has nothing to do with how actual research is performed. It has more to do with the organization of the major societies. Every field of science has at least one, and usually a few, major societies that researchers in that field belong to. Members pay annual dues and as a result they get journals published by that society, as well as the ability to present research at that society's conferences. Outside of that belonging to a scientific society doesn't really entail anything. At the time of this video Zimbardo happened to be the president of the largest psychological society the APA. Since that time he is retired and the current president is Melba Vasquez.



posted on Oct, 24 2011 @ 06:08 PM
link   
reply to post by Xcalibur254
 


A sympathizer for Lucifer is a sympathizer. Let's not try to catechize a type A personality into a type F and claim they were lulled by the delusions of a slow slide, when they were essentially the authors of the slow slide. Even the fallen angel himself would scoff and scorn the point, when remotely cornered on the matter as it affected his social front.
edit on 24-10-2011 by Northwarden because: (no reason given)



posted on Oct, 24 2011 @ 06:11 PM
link   
reply to post by Xcalibur254
 



Thank you and starred.
A voice of reason in a desert of paranoia and overthinking.

Gods and angels? Pfft.

However, as a Scientist, I guess I'm tainted and working for 'the dark side' as well!


edit on 24-10-2011 by aorAki because: (no reason given)



posted on Oct, 24 2011 @ 06:20 PM
link   

Originally posted by Xcalibur254
reply to post by Getsmart
 


And you got all of that from this one lecture? Clearly you're not familiar with Zimbardo and his work and you clearly misconstrued what he is discussing in these videos. The Lucifer Effect is Zimbardo's name for how good people can become evil through societal influences. When he talks about redeeming Lucifer's reputation, he is saying not to think of him as an innately evil creature, but one whose downfall was brought about by societal pressures. He is pretty much saying that evilness is not a hard wired characteristic and if one can go from good to evil through outside influences then the converse should also be possible.

As for the Council of Scientific Society Presidents, it has nothing to do with how actual research is performed. It has more to do with the organization of the major societies. Every field of science has at least one, and usually a few, major societies that researchers in that field belong to. Members pay annual dues and as a result they get journals published by that society, as well as the ability to present research at that society's conferences. Outside of that belonging to a scientific society doesn't really entail anything. At the time of this video Zimbardo happened to be the president of the largest psychological society the APA. Since that time he is retired and the current president is Melba Vasquez.


Good post.
I can see most of the people posting have a very imaginative perspective ont he luciferian mythos.
Some should read more than a wikipedia entry on lucifer if they wish to actually see the complexity of the stoy.
It's not " he was a vain angle that god cast out of heaven".
That version is entirely incorrect and not based on scripture or religeous text at all.

God=good
Lucifer=Pure evil is also false, and anyone buying that needs to go and actually read their scripture if they want to be educated on the story of lucifer and "the Fall".



posted on Oct, 24 2011 @ 06:28 PM
link   
reply to post by BadNinja68
 


He's(Lucifer) saying "Pure evil is false", but along the lines of, "I'll not speak against your pure evil until you're smart enough to see past it". And, "I'll even support your barbaric views and then adopt you when you see past them". It's still a diabolical scam.
edit on 24-10-2011 by Northwarden because: (no reason given)



posted on Oct, 24 2011 @ 07:39 PM
link   
reply to post by Northwarden
 


I don't think you're getting the message. Zimbardo's not talking about a physical Lucifer. He's using Lucifer as a metaphor. According to Western mythology Lucifer is the most evil being there is, but according to Zimbardo's research evil is not an inherited trait, instead it is learned and thus can be unlearned. He's pretty much saying that no matter how evil someone may be there is still hope for them. The Lucifer Effect has as much to do with Lucifer as the God Particle has to do with God.



posted on Oct, 24 2011 @ 08:16 PM
link   

Originally posted by Xcalibur254
According to Western mythology Lucifer is the most evil being there is
Which only shows up how screwed up the mythology has become, because according to the Bible, Lucifer is just another name for the planet Venus. Planet's are not inherently evil…



posted on Oct, 24 2011 @ 09:20 PM
link   
I think that a short sighted Religion has gotten a stranglehold on not just its parishioners, but the very fabric of our society and twisted it to such an extent that Anytime a mention is made of "Lucifer," there lies a knee jerk reaction that mingles little with logic or reason.

A knee jerk reaction that blinds any attempt at illumination.



posted on Dec, 1 2011 @ 03:29 PM
link   

Originally posted by jimnuggits
I think that a short sighted Religion has gotten a stranglehold on not just its parishioners, but the very fabric of our society and twisted it to such an extent that Anytime a mention is made of "Lucifer," there lies a knee jerk reaction that mingles little with logic or reason.

A knee jerk reaction that blinds any attempt at illumination.


Yeah, and that religious dogma blinding fearful souls is only surpassed by the Masonic vanity and neo-mystical superstition which seems to pervade the numerous Luciferian apologists who populate ATS threads more than might be expected. Lucifer is Lucifer, Satan by any other name. I have seen him and know him to be real. Those who are self-impressed initiates and take the clever spin for truth make me grin. Once you meet up with him you'll not have much opportunity to redress your error. Good luck!

GS


edit on 1-12-2011 by Getsmart because: Lucifer isn't a metaphor, test his mettle and you'll find out!



posted on Dec, 1 2011 @ 03:33 PM
link   
reply to post by Getsmart
 


Welcome to the United Nations...



posted on Dec, 1 2011 @ 04:41 PM
link   

Originally posted by Getsmart
I have seen him and know him to be real.


What does he look like?

Was he with anyone else of note (Santa, the Tooth Fairy, Freddy Kreuger, etc.)?



posted on Dec, 1 2011 @ 05:21 PM
link   

Originally posted by Getsmart
I have seen him and know him to be real.


I call B.S. on this one.
Sorry GS, but you're obviously not grounded in any sort of reality that the majority of people operate in on a daily basis. I can imagine you taking that as a compliment, but it's really not.

I couldn't imagine living my life so paranoid and quite possibly mentally-unhinged!



posted on Dec, 1 2011 @ 05:24 PM
link   
reply to post by Getsmart
 


Excellent thread!
S&F

I hope lots of people check out the info you've provided and it helps wake them up.



posted on Dec, 1 2011 @ 05:53 PM
link   
reply to post by Afterthought
 


Please read the thread. It's not even a page long. The OP had no idea what Zimbardo's research entailed outside of using the word Lucifer. There's also the fact that Zimbardo no longer holds the position the OP claims he does and hasn't for years. Not to mention that the OP has no idea what that position entails or what Zimbardo was talking about.



posted on Dec, 2 2011 @ 03:11 PM
link   

Originally posted by AugustusMasonicus

What does he look like?

Was he with anyone else of note (Santa, the Tooth Fairy, Freddy Kreuger, etc.)?


Certainly not so very August if indeed overly Masonicus, I really think that you are giving Freemasonry a bad name with your constant attacks against anyone who takes exception to the very existence of a Secret Order which first casts a deep schism between themselves and other citizens, disconsidered and kept in the dark, and which also subverts in many ways the precepts of an agreed upon society. You cannot be democratic when you must agree with top down directives which are by nature autocratic, even if your lodge simulates participation by having you chit chat about issues as if your opinion really mattered. You cannot be out to help society when you forsake it by setting yourself apart, either by opportunism, in a quest for personal power, out of creepy mystical cultism or simply to become something other than your boring self?


I had an experience, and it does not behold you to either discredit it or to mock me while I sincerely share what I know to be true. My truth comes from experience and was not transmitted to me by ritualistic symbolism and preposterous gesturing which was probably designed by your Masonic Masters to mock you. Enjoy your Sect but tread lightly when you defame and attempt to discredit other ATS members simply because they have knowledge or experience which you fail to understand.


GETSMART if you still can





new topics
top topics
 
45
<<   2  3  4 >>

log in

join