Senate Moves to Subsidize Homes for the Rich, page
Pages:
ATS Members have flagged this thread 3 times
Topic started on 23-10-2011 @ 11:46 PM by Vitchilo
And democrats control the senate. Surprised? You shouldn't be. Democrats and republicans, same thing, work for the same people.

The Senate Moves to Subsidize Homes for the Rich
Anyone who hoped that we would begin to see how the mortgage market might function with a tiny bit less government support should be pretty disappointed today. The Senate approved a measure that would reinstate the high-cost mortgage limits that expired on September 30th. The move seeks to ensure that relatively affluent Americans will get slightly cheaper mortgages, while keeping the training wheels on the housing finance market.

For anyone who hasn't been following along, here's a detailed explanation. For a quick refresher, the government agreed to back bigger mortgages in 2008 when the credit markets froze up. At that time through September of this year, the mortgage limit was 125% of the metro area's median home price in 2007 or $729,750, whichever was smaller. Prior to this jump, the limit was set at just $417,000. As of this month, that limit declined to 115% of the metro area's median home price in 2010 or $625,500, whichever is smaller.

You can see that this policy is specifically geared towards relatively expensive mortgages. It isn't meant to lend a helping hand to Americans on the cusp of home ownership. It isn't even meant to assist the average homeowner, who will have an income above the metro area's average. In any city, those who raising the limit would benefit will be relatively affluent. The old limits should be allowed to expire.

Brilliant.


reply posted on 24-10-2011 @ 12:04 AM by Evolutionsend
reply to post by Vitchilo



Where's the accountability for them? It's sad, even democrats are acting like republicans. We need some real and some smart democrats in our government right now. Obviously these guys are neither!

reply to post by WP4YT



People are also stupid.
edit on 24-10-2011 by Evolutionsend because: (no reason given)




reply posted on 24-10-2011 @ 04:23 AM by Rockpuck
reply to post by Vitchilo



I wouldn't consider $750k "rich" .. especially for a house? Someone making a combined income of $150k/year could easily afford a 750k house. I used to live (in an apartment) in a neighborhood where the median house value was $680k and it was a middle class neighborhood ... just houses were expensive. I can see on many places on the East Coast perhaps, that's a lot of money, but that's why there is a provision about metro areas .. meaning where I live it would cover a more expensive mortgage because house prices here are insane, but in Alabama the limit would be less than half of that price.

It's for the middle to upper middle class.


reply posted on 24-10-2011 @ 08:57 AM by Blackmarketeer
reply to post by Mcupobob



I think the government should do whatever the hell Texas is doing when it comes to the housing market, say what you want about the state but their doing something right. The houses here dirt cheap, all nice neighborhoods. Even the rent is cheaper for a 2 bedroom apartment next to the college, and they managed to do this during a huge immigration? I'm not sure if its going to end up like the housing boom that happen in Cali, though the prices are still maintain. Not sure if their subsidizing or not if anyone knows can you fill me in?


Just an FYI, median home values in Dallas-FW area is $316,000 - Metro Dallas is well above that, and these are not large homes - 2 bedrooms tracts on a postage stamp sized yard - Texas has also been a boom state for McMansions with median values closing in on 500,000. Maybe out in the boonies or outside the metro areas you might see prices a middle class person might call reasonable.



reply posted on 24-10-2011 @ 09:02 AM by marg6043
reply to post by WP4YT



It has nothing to do with the regular people, my friend, but those that are in positions of govenrment and have ties to big interest money, tell me how many of our own for the people elected whores are actually poor people.

That is how laws are passed to benefit the ones at the top, influence and money goes a long way, the poor has none.


reply posted on 24-10-2011 @ 09:27 AM by Mcupobob
reply to post by Blackmarketeer



I live in Austin, only a couple of miles outside the city in the suburbs. Though I just came from California, were housing costed your first newborn, even out in the Boonies. Over a half a mil sometimes. Rent in the slums costed about 700-800 for a one bedroom in a crappy neighborhood in the middle of nowhere.

So I might just be coming down form the shock of the crap going on there.

EDIT: My aunt and Uncle got this place for just under 200K. 4 bed 3 bath.
edit on 10/24/2011 by Mcupobob because: (no reason given)

Pages:     ^^TOP^^



Ron Paul is NOT dropping out, the Mainstream Media is LYING.
  Posted 15 days ago with 111 member flags
Report: Romney Will Be Disqualified From Race Due To Fraud
  Posted 18 days ago with 105 member flags
Evidence of Vote Flipping in GOP Primary Elections
  Posted 7 days ago with 88 member flags
Fox News Analyst: First American to shoot down drone will be a hero
  Posted 14 days ago with 68 member flags
Mitt Romney scared Ron Paul is winning!!!
  Posted 7 days ago with 62 member flags
Let\'s just say it: Political Parties are the Problem
  Posted 12 days ago with 60 member flags