Originally posted by dillweed
Very good question. Wouldn't hazard a guess as to percentages going in, what I'm optimistic about are the percentages coming out.
Why though? I'm genuinely intrigued. It seems to me that these events have nothing to do with 9/11, apart from fairly transparent and shoddy attempts
by Truthers to piggyback them for publicity.
I didn't invent the quote I mentioned earlier. The only person I saw at Occupy london who even mentioned 9/11 Truth did so in a disparaging
manner.
I firmly believe than any sane person, shown the list of instances where the facts don't support the story, would come away changed, if they
believed otherwise before. If your story was sound, we wouldn't be having this conversation.
That's a common Truther trope but it's not one I can see any evidence for. The reverse, actually. You're a person who believed the internet would
be effectively shut down last year, so your track record of judgement is demonstrably shaky at best. I'd hazard that it's as misapplied with regard
to 9/11 as it was with matters of free speech.