Wow....

All of these pages of posts and

NO ONE has critically thought this out.....I have no clue why there is LOL when the mention of Anunnaki or whatever name you'd like to give them but

YES we were genetically engineered by the use of primate DNA and Exterrrestrial DNA ( you all call it a 'higher being')

That explains why primates are still around....because only a selected group of primates were chosen for the 'Genesis Experiment'

What do you all think was meant in Gen 1:26 (God said "Let us make mankind in our image")

That is an exterrestrial speaking to the others proposing the idea of DNA splicing

[edit on 3-4-2010 by ButterCookie]

Originally posted by ButterCookie
Wow....

All of these pages of posts and

NO ONE has critically thought this out.....I have no clue why there is LOL when the mention of Anunnaki or whatever name you'd like to give them but

because the claims are absurd and have zero evidence.

YES we were genetically engineered by the use of primate DNA and Exterrrestrial DNA ( you all call it a 'higher being')

so why is it that all of our dna matches pretty much up with chimp dna? why do ERVs match up? what proof do you have other than poorly translated sumarian creation myths and cherry picked images?

That explains why primates are still around....because only a selected group of primates were chosen for the 'Genesis Experiment'

no it doesn't, we mapped the genome and it fits right in where we would expect it to on the cladistic tree

What do you all think was meant in Gen 1:26 (God said "Let us make mankind in our image")

That is an exterrestrial speaking to the others proposing the idea of DNA splicing

[edit on 3-4-2010 by ButterCookie]

it was a pagan reference to elohim a plural name for YHWH.
i'd love to hear how an alien with no DNA in common with earth life could splice with any form of life on earth.
magic?

Originally posted by Hoppinmad1

Evolution cannont exist.

I know someone who thinks the same.
And every year he takes a flu shot.
Now why would he do that, if evolution does not exist?

I do not agree with a post I read here earlier. African people never had anything until it was brought to them.They lived like they did for thousands of years inventing nothing. So I do not believe it was the sun that caused their black skin. White skinned people in almost everything invented most every thing and gave it to the african's. There is quite a difference in white skinned people and black people. I am not a racist either. It is just a fact.

The funny thing about the entire debate is that micro evolution is a FACT and proveable, but from that they make the humongous leap of FAITH and assume that macro evolution is true...

The FACT is macro evolution has NEVER been observed EVER and NEVER will be lol.

Every species that still exists does so because they can compete and have a niche to fill in their environment- if as you say only the most advanced species should remain then there would be only humans, no apes, no monkeys no lemurs no deers no aadvarks no cockroaches etc. There are no other near Homo Sapiens species left like Neanderthal, Robustus, Habilis etc. because they were direct competitors, some disappeared fairly recently like 30-40,000 years ago. Actually most human evolution has gone into brain expansion and upright walking (still a weak point!) not that advanced. But no reason why other species shouldn't exist.

Originally posted by Hoppinmad1

If evolution is true wouldn't nature seek out to make these creatures more like us since we are the most highly evolved species on earth. These species such as apes have been in existence longer than humans for the most part. Why is there only one advanced species on earth out of the billions there are?

There seems to be a lot of confusion of "Origin" on ATS these days.
What the average user doesn't understand is it's all a stage act. To quote from Shakespear: "Life is but a stage, ... all of us merely actors", to get the jist of it.

The question and conclusive answer in itself determines one's genre of act/dress/buddies/culture.

Your apesters like to use spirit ether to paste fur on themselve and race around on camera acting a primordial fool. Godlike seem to jib at the three piece, because then you are of the 'body', and can get away with murder; after all, just confess and you're 'clear'.

SyFy'ers like flashy: Bang, flash, no batteries needed. Ultima in that, where them computers will most certain generate yet another 'eye grabber' that will dictate the Superior Nature of 'other than self'.

Abstincia is another realm, whereas nonexistence is a certainty, because as one dictates the belief system, 20% or more of the audience hits the snooze button.

Myself, well I fall in the Progressionist niche. Where, there's no certainty, nothing is guaranteed, the warranty is void, your lecture is moving faster out the other ear, and last but not least, 'knock yourself out' with your "Larger than Life" talk...


[edit on 4/15/2010 by passingthought]

***Darn keys slipping'''"***


[edit on 4/15/2010 by passingthought]

We evolved from a branch which had the primates in them. That's to say, we and the apes/monkeys evolved from a common ancestor. We aren't evolved from monkeys or apes. Please try to understand the basics of the theory, before attempting to debunk it.

I've read all of these supporting statements, and so far every evolutionist has beat around the bush. Every defensive line involves some ridiculous analogy that makes no sense whatsoever and does not defend evolution. We could sit around all day and fabricate all these elaborate phrases and still you wouldn't prove a dang to me. Just because 90% of dna is similar between apes and humans does not mean that we came from apes. Just because you say we came from Europeans and they did not disappear does not prove to me how a being almost as perfect as us has lived on this planet for just as long as these other creatures and yet somehow we completely surpass their abilities. Every evolutionist keeps bringing up this transgenic species that has yet to be discovered as their most solid argument.... this is ridiculous. Take a look at the night sky for a while and tell me this all was an accident. Try to delve deep, in your self aware existence and really ask yourself how we could have 'evolved' at such an accelerated rate compared to a species that is "90% similar" to us. Even the ancient man was able to pick up a stick and depict drawings of everything he perceived. Our abilities are much greater than any mere animal, and I refuse to believe that we magically grew faster than other species who have been alive for far longer.

Humans and chimps had a common ancestor. There was a split where humans and chimplike creatures spawned spawned. Human males interbred with the chimp females. The male children were sterile and the females could bear young. There was another split and apparently the two species were far enough apart on an evoloutionary scale that no further intermingling occurred. Which is why we have chimps and humans today.

Originally posted by Myollinir
I've read all of these supporting statements, and so far every evolutionist has beat around the bush. Every defensive line involves some ridiculous analogy that makes no sense whatsoever and does not defend evolution. We could sit around all day and fabricate all these elaborate phrases and still you wouldn't prove a dang to me. Just because 90% of dna is similar between apes and humans does not mean that we came from apes.

But the analogies still work fine, when people don't seem to grasp even the simplest statements about evolution. Even you don't seem to get it - We did *not* evolve from apes, and no one ever said so!

Every evolutionist keeps bringing up this transgenic species that has yet to be discovered as their most solid argument.... this is ridiculous.

What 'missing' transgenic species are you refering to? If you mean "the missing link", then it is more or less established - By fossile evidence - that it is a fact.

Take a look at the night sky for a while and tell me this all was an accident. Try to delve deep, in your self aware existence and really ask yourself how we could have 'evolved' at such an accelerated rate compared to a species that is "90% similar" to us.

Again, you don't grasp the basics of evolution. All species are evolving at all times. Some evolve slower, since they fullfil a niche, but that still doesn't rule out speciation. Bacteria evolve faster than we do, and there's like 8.000.000.000 species of those, so your argument doesn't make sense.

Even the ancient man was able to pick up a stick and depict drawings of everything he perceived. Our abilities are much greater than any mere animal, and I refuse to believe that we magically grew faster than other species who have been alive for far longer.

So, because we can paint, we are a magical creation?