Originally posted by septic
The anomalies like flashes and "pods", or 'laser beacons" were deliberately added.
For the 911 to succeed, there needed to be an unprecedented propaganda barrage in place to apply blame and to deflect suspicion properly. Since the
best way to control the opposition is to lead it, certain anomalies and suspicious facts were deliberately leaked to kick-start the controlled
opposition, in this case the controlled truth movement would appear to be valid by pointing out incriminating evidence, but in reality are only
complaining about red-herrings and false leads.
edit on 22-10-2011 by septic because: (no reason given)
Was thinking about this in relation to the Pentagon. As in, are the photos of no 757 wreckage at the Pentagon the truth or are they altered? I would
think to make it sell more parts of a 757 should've been apparent.
Therefore, the early photos apart from staging of fire hose spray, smoking generator, fact shots are from far away etc., the photos depict the
So, is what we see in the second hit what was viewable and recordable as it was or was it altered?
If things were added couldn't things have been removed? I mean, some say there's an addition of a pod, well, couldn't the same people who added
that remove the 'flash'? Clearly they could've if the videos were tampered with.
But look, why leave something in that no one can readily or easily explain that will have people scratching their heads and making threads about it
ten years later if what you're trying to do is sell a certain story with no one asking any questions? It doesn't make much sense therefore, to leave
the 'flash' in if people are only going to question it. (Or to add a pod to a plane only to have people say later: "What the heck is that pod
I'll argue now for the same thing with the pod but in reverse.
If you're trying to sell something why add anomalies easy to see but hard to explain?
My thinking is therefore, like my view on the early Pentagon crash photos, and that is that that second hit video was what was and could be recorded
only with no subtractions or additions or tampering of video or even of things added to the plane.
The 'pod' was seen on the plane, the 'flash' was seen on the plane, the shape of the nose of the plane going in mirrors the shape of whatever came
out the other side etc.
Something in the same/similar shape as the first 25 feet of the plane came out the other side but I don't think it was a nose or any part of a
There were not only vertical steel around the tower but horizontal floors as well, that ran the complete area of the towers - every floor. That means
anything going in at an angle doesn't really GO IN as much as get destroyed in strips like one of those old red handle potato cutters that slice them
into chips. The floors had substance and ran the whole width of the building. Anything going in at an angle would've been sliced just like a
So I think the video and any "anomalies" are just what was recorded and that the "nose out" wasn't a nose out, obviously, (see above), but was
just what was seen and recorded as what it was.
Now, what was it?