Originally posted by backinblack
reply to post by JROCK2527
Couldn't you just post this in the original thread?
Do we really need another one.
Originally posted by Forevever
:::insert comment about the search function:::
It really gets on my nerves when people say this. Newsflash: Even when you search, you might not find the results, if you don't search for the right
terms to begin with. Sometimes people just don't figure out the best terms to use in a search. It doesn't mean they didn't try.
As to the real topic:
I'm very much anti-Camping, to say the least, but...
Originally posted by jeramie
He has no fundamental knowledge of the Bible, or else he would never have tried to set a date for the second coming.
I semi-disagree. He had what he thought was his interpretation of the Bible. Just like everyone elses view is just an interpretation.
The guy is a psycho, but no worse than any other person who makes any claims or judgment based on anything in the Bible.
On another general tangent (in other words, not in reply to Jeramie):
I know Camping is a psycho, and I know it didn't happen, but to show a contrarian position...
Isn't it a bit arrogant to say that it didn't happen, since your proof is that you are still here? Can people not accept that they might actually
not have been saved, even though they think they should have been?
P.S. Did I mention the guy is a psycho?