posted on Nov, 13 2011 @ 05:45 PM
reply to post by Aestheteka
I never said ever.
Let's see what you did write.
hilst we are facing the most extreme weather conditions ever recorded
You may not have remembered your wording, but there it is. You did in fact say "ever." I provided the link to your post if you want to check and see
You aren't stuck with that wording. Maybe you meant to say something else. You are free to adjust your position.
I have not trolled or spammed. What I have done is to challenge claims such as the one you yourself made which is clearly not true. I have provided
evidence that shows that the claim you made is not true. I have even proposed the year 1816 as one with much more extreme weather. It snowed in every
month of the year causing many deaths when crops failed.
I hope at some point to meet you on a more level playing field.
This is an open forum. You are free to post evidence to support your position. In almost every single instance you have chosen not to. Lately you have
posted information not relevant to your position or misrepresent information.
you hadn't studied the opposition's (e.g. miy, in this case) evidence.
I only had to see 4 minutes of your video to understand that you were misrepresenting issues to the point that I would suggest could be construed as
telling bald faced lies such as your claims about Nemesis and Betelgeuse and relevance of magnetism in relation to animal die offs.
I will be thinking about you a lot.
There in lies the problem. You need to address the issues and not make overt personal attacks.
One of the complaints I have with the videos is the images of the 2 suns. It turns out that the 2 suns setting behind the buildings is a photo showing
Peoria, Illinois. It lies on the Illinois River which can be seen in the foreground of the photoshopped image. That image appeared on the internet as
early as 2006 and was quickly identified as a hoax. It is even used by people to show what a hoax looks like.
You might consider not using a well known hoax image to support your idea.
edit on 13-11-2011 by stereologist because: (no reason