reply to post by Rocketman7
would an e-cig work after an EMP?
Originally posted by purplemer
reply to post by Rocketman7
would an e-cig work after an EMP?
Originally posted by Six6Six
Originally posted by swoopaloop
Originally posted by Six6Six
Originally posted by swoopaloop
Originally posted by Six6Six
Originally posted by swoopaloop
Originally posted by Six6Six
Originally posted by swoopaloop
Originally posted by Six6Six
Originally posted by swoopaloop
Hey Satanist here are some facts for you.
Chances of getting lung cancer when not exposed to secondhand smoke : 10 out of 1000000
Chances of getting lung cancer when exposed to secondhand smoke: 12.5 out of 1000000
Statistical insignificance!
Everyone of any significance in this world is a Satanist.
Swoopaloop? Was that not the name given to a group of pedophiles in Belgium. Yes it was.
So we know your game now.
Lmao wow you seem very intelligent.![]()
This is a nickname of mine in which the meaning behind it is none of your business lmao. And no I'm not a pedophile lmao. You sure are something else.
Actually, within the confines of Interpols Women and Children exploitation division they had a case in 1997 that allegedly involved some upper echelons of the Belgium government. There was a task force set up to track pedophiles across europe. It was named swoopaloop because most pedos within Interpol are referred to as Loops. Code for pedo. So operation swoopaloop was active for 9 months. As no one was ever successfully indicted the taskforce was reassined. Now within Interpol, pedos or swoopaloops are the same thing. Any time Interpol goes after pedos or a group of pedo its called swoopaloop. As the case invloved high up members of the belgium gov all recorded were sealed indefinitely blocking names and addresses that were searched.
Hence your name and you!!edit on 20-10-2011 by Six6Six because: (no reason given)edit on 20-10-2011 by Six6Six because: (no reason given)
lmaoo!!! okay so you have no rebuttal on the smoking debate in which I've proved you wrong so instead you give me some history lesson from Belgium? Lmao I don't care about what you think my nickname means. Here's my definition behind "Swoopaloop"
Within the life of a young man who is nicknamed Swoop, or sometimes refered to as Swoopaloop there was a time in 2009 when this man had interest in a woman who had a boyfriend. He then decided that he would win her heart over and "Swoop" in on her boyfriend and get with her. He accomplished his mission and accomplished that same mission with other ladies who had boyfriends. Later on his friends would laugh at this and nickname him Swoop and/or Swoopaloop.
Here's a history lesson for you lmao. Mine is way more awsome lmao
You have proved nothing.
Every medical doctor in the WORLD will tell you that smoking kills!!
That is all the proof i need. Not some made up proof from a person who claims to steal girls from their boyfriends. I think you may be confusing Ladies with children and boyfriends with parents.
I will deal with you no more Mr Swoopaloop. But luck with what you do. The law is right behind you!
lmao nanananana hahahahahaha I totally win.
Also, I didn't claim that smoking doesn't kill. I claimed that statistics behind second hand smoke are bullsh!t and offered you proof that you failed to take in.
You've got nothing on me Satanist. Your life is probably an empty abyss. Have a great day and tell Satan I said "Whatup!" lmaoedit on 20-10-2011 by swoopaloop because: (no reason given)
As for you MR swoopaloop (pedo)
Recent research published by the Ontario Tobacco Research Unit showed that with drivers smoking just one cigarette, the pollution created inside the car was 100 times greater than the US Environmental Protection Agency accepted standard for fine particle exposure. New Brunswick is the latest province in Canada to introduce legislation banning smoking in cars with children. This change in legislation will prohibit smoking in a car when there is a child under the age of 16 in it. Extremely sensible, common sense - but seen by some as too draconian and the trickling of nanny state rules again.
Second-hand smoke has been found to be strongly linked to chest infections in children, asthma, ear problems and sudden infant death syndrome, or cot death.
Source
ALL your facts are WRONG.
You should be BANNED for spreading false facts.
Interesting study. I will do more research into the subject that's for sure. And if I should be banned for these false facts then so should you on account of you calling me a "pedophile" which is a false fact. Nice Logic there
Point taken. I retract my stupidity!!

Originally posted by Six6Six
reply to post by Rocketman7
Smokers are weak and often they are considered easily breakable.
Plus they smell bad and quite frankly you can never trust a person that needs a drug to operate.
I would vote for smokers to be rounded up and be the first in line in the depopulation agenda. Plus they are a drain
on the Medical system right along side fat people!
I rank smokers along side pedophiles, rapists and religious zealots and obese people!edit on 20-10-2011 by Six6Six because: (no reason given)
Please explain, because to me you are sounding like someone with major daddy issues. 