No need to quit smoking during the apocalypse

page: 2
13
<< 1    3  4  5 >>

log in

join

posted on Oct, 20 2011 @ 02:41 PM
link   
reply to post by Six6Six
 


Smoking up to 1000 different poisons is just DUMB. So they should be treated accordingly.



Not true if get natural tabaco with veryy little additives. its not so bad. do you loath giant corparations that pollute way more than a smoker in ther entier life ?

what about the native americans smoked for spirtual reasons. were thay just as bad a pedophiles in your eyes tow ? the natrual tobaco is a far cry from the modern cancer stick




posted on Oct, 20 2011 @ 02:42 PM
link   

Originally posted by newcovenant
reply to post by Rocketman7
 


Oh for Gods sakes I was reading along and taking this seriously until I realized this is really an ad.

If it isn't it sounds an awful lot LIKE one and I guess I apologize but this sounds to me like an ad for whatever is posted at the link. Naturally other posters have already probably said this and so I am being redundant. Sorry for NOT reading all the posts. Sometimes I like to be spontaneous. It is a grave fault that will more than likely get me killed one day. Meanwhile... I enjoy the suspense.

I will tell you what this HAS done: I am an ex smoker myself and had planned to take it up again if and when I was certain there wasn't much longer we might live anyway.

You have just stopped me from doing that.
I do not relish in fact I will not... be a slave.
If I know I am vulnerable to attack and here it will be my own inclination to smoke - I can head it off and prevent the very possibility. Thank you very much in either event - I mean if this is a blatant advertisement for the smokeless cigarette or not. I see many EMBEDDED advertisements such as this popping up everywhere lately. Last night on 30 Rock was an "embedded" commercial for the Mc Flurry. They made the Mc Flurry a part of the show. I about fell off my chair.

And some of the most respected movie stars hawking reverse mortgages.
What a criminal enterprise THEY ARE.

I guess everybody needs money.



edit on 20-10-2011 by newcovenant because: (no reason given)


Its a blatant ad for the book One Second After and I am the guy who wrote the forward Newt Gingrich.

How is that? Actually no I am not Newt Gingrich, I am just a survival newt.

And as such you better stock up because when TSHTF, all the gun play will be at the cigarette counter first.



posted on Oct, 20 2011 @ 02:42 PM
link   

Originally posted by Frater210
reply to post by Six6Six
 





I would vote for smokers to be rounded up and be the first in line in the depopulation agenda.


This is just a little ambiguous so I wanted to be clear. Do you mean that you would vote for smokers to be rounded up and then you would be the first in line? Or that smokers should be rounded up and they should be the first in line for depopulation? Or did you somehow hope to cryptically infer that you would somehow how be waiting at the front of the line?

Thanks in advance.



My little rant has missed the mark.

I mean that if you are to believe that there is a depopulation agenda at hand then smoker should be rounded up and used as the first batch of people to be "depopulated". After all if you get rid of all the smokers the elites will almost have their ideal 500 million population.

I did not make sense earlier and apologize!
edit on 20-10-2011 by Six6Six because: (no reason given)



posted on Oct, 20 2011 @ 02:45 PM
link   

Originally posted by Talltexxxan
reply to post by Six6Six
 


Well I guess your just Mr.Perfect then, arnt ya?

Really? wow, just wow!
If this is truly how you feel about someone who has an addiction than maybe you should be the first in line for the gas chambers. Theres alot I would like to say to you but all would be in violation of ATS's T & C.

Geeez...... Love is unconditional brotha, and you need alot of it.
I believe it was a speech made in the movie " The Great Dictator" that it is said.

"Only the unloved hate"
edit on 20-10-2011 by Talltexxxan because: (no reason given)


Agreed! Well, maybe without the gas chamber part.

Perhaps six6six has had a bad experience with the effects of smoking...maybe a friend or loved one w/ cancer. Who knows but, I would prefer to be around a smoker than a pedofile anyday.



posted on Oct, 20 2011 @ 02:46 PM
link   
reply to post by Six6Six
 


okey so if you distain and loath the somkers so much how about the giant companey that provied the "poison" ?
i think you were onto somthing ther about hanging around whith a serial killer. actuly might be the smartest thing iv heard you say yet LOL



posted on Oct, 20 2011 @ 02:46 PM
link   

Originally posted by Six6Six
reply to post by Rocketman7
 

I clicked the wrong link on this...it is for mr six6six
Smokers are weak and often they are considered easily breakable.

Plus they smell bad and quite frankly you can never trust a person that needs a drug to operate.

I would vote for smokers to be rounded up and be the first in line in the depopulation agenda. Plus they are a drain
on the Medical system right along side fat people!

I rank smokers along side pedophiles, rapists and religious zealots and obese people!
edit on 20-10-2011 by Six6Six because: (no reason given)


Smokers are only physically weak: Many are quite alert mentally.
They do have a stale odor about them, but they do take showers and wash their clothing so it is only transient.
You would like a depopulation agenda? Is this what you are proposing? to depopulate?
so you would round up people who are overweight as well? and do what with them?
Pedophiles, rapists and religious zealots?...compared to someone who smokes?
I may not smoke and am strongly against it but every individual has their rights as long as they do not impose themselves on me. You on the other hand appear to have an agenda and it is not unlike TPTB ...hmmmm
who are you really? Smoking may not be good for someone, but really pedophiles and rapists?
edit on 20-10-2011 by DavidsHope because: Clicked the wrong link.....sorry



posted on Oct, 20 2011 @ 02:46 PM
link   
reply to post by Six6Six
 





smoker(s) should be rounded up and used as the first batch of people to be "depopulated". After all if you get rid of all the smokers the elites will almost have their ideal 500 million population.


OK. So when the 'Elites' come around and begin to demand depopulation you will be the first to cooperate with them by suggesting that all of us smokers be taken first.

There is a cinematic quality to what you are suggesting that I find irresistible.

If you put down the shovel now I will quit encouraging you to dig.




posted on Oct, 20 2011 @ 02:46 PM
link   

Originally posted by Six6Six

Originally posted by jplaysguitar
reply to post by Six6Six
 


lol you underestimate smokers! .if you gota a smoker and cigs are running low that dose not make them less effective. If anything thay are even more efective becuas thay will be far more motivated to get out in to town to re up on smokes.

and the whole lumping smokers and the obeese with the likes of pedophiles?? really?
i tried to keep an open mind with you until i read that little gem! haha
Are you shur you are in the right place?
you prolly just alienated more then half the ATS comunity
edit on 20-10-2011 by jplaysguitar because: 777


That is BS. A smoker is a drug addict at the end of the day. They will sell their own children to get a cigarette.

Smokers have long been a useless part of society. People who slowly kill themselves and pay a fortune for it....How dumb does one have to be. I my opinion and its just mine, smokers should not be entitled to free medical or any government or state benefits. They should be outcast and have no rights. After all they smoke willy nilly abusing non smokers rights all day, blowing their poison into the air.

Smokers are just weak, take away their cigs and they become a pest!


As for alienating half of this community. I dont care. I would rather hold the company of a serial killer than that of a room full of smokers.
edit on 20-10-2011 by Six6Six because: (no reason given)



True. Merciless and tough but true.

As long as I was armed yes I would rather be with the serial killers. Just because of my health and all. I don't LIKE them better or anything.
You did say just "be around" and for that yes I would rather be a prison guard in a non smoking jail than a dealer at a "smoking allowed" casino...almost no matter what the pay difference.



posted on Oct, 20 2011 @ 02:47 PM
link   

Originally posted by Six6Six
A smoker is a drug addict at the end of the day. They will sell their own children to get a cigarette.

Smokers have long been a useless part of society. People who slowly kill themselves and pay a fortune for it....How dumb does one have to be. I my opinion and its just mine, smokers should not be entitled to free medical or any government or state benefits. They should be outcast and have no rights. After all they smoke willy nilly abusing non smokers rights all day, blowing their poison into the air.

Smokers are just weak, take away their cigs and they become a pest!


And you can obviously provide evidence of this? I'm a smoker and have kids yet I wouldn't be selling them simply to satisfy an urge that can be controlled. You seem to misunderstand that people who smoke, generally enjoy it. Why would they do it otherwise? Especially with the number of quitting aids on the market.

Of course, enjoying smoking is like saying you worship the devil, it always elicits the worse possible response in people (as evidenced above). I, like many other smokers, are aware of the dangers but we make the choice anyway, it is ours to make. At the end of the day, even if I didn't smoke, I will still eventually die through some other causes (possibly heart disease which is an equally horrifying death).

You do realise that you are far more likely, if you live in an urban area, to develop lung problems due from exhaust fumes than you are from passive smoking. However, one could argue that passive smoking has gotten worse due to the smoking ban as before we were spread out and dispersed whereas now we are herded together, like cattle, into a small shelter creating a massive cloud of toxic smoke. Don't blame us for that, it was your doing.

I appreciate and respect your opinions but not the manner in which you throw them around. I've got nothing against your stance on smoking, if anything I welcome the debate, but please remember manners and decorum in the future.

Rant over.


+1 more 
posted on Oct, 20 2011 @ 02:48 PM
link   
reply to post by Six6Six
 


Someone was molested by a smoker apparently. It wasnt your fault!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Just so you know, your kids WILL be smokers one day because of your attitude tword it. Thats how it works. i hope your not spewing this "round them up and kill them" garbage around them.



posted on Oct, 20 2011 @ 02:49 PM
link   

Originally posted by jplaysguitar
reply to post by Six6Six
 


Smoking up to 1000 different poisons is just DUMB. So they should be treated accordingly.



Not true if get natural tabaco with veryy little additives. its not so bad. do you loath giant corparations that pollute way more than a smoker in ther entier life ?

what about the native americans smoked for spirtual reasons. were thay just as bad a pedophiles in your eyes tow ? the natrual tobaco is a far cry from the modern cancer stick





No im an equal opportunity hater. I hate giant corporation of ANY kind. Just as much as smokers.

Natural tobacco may be less harmful but second hand smoke is second hand smoke.

Pedophiles harm maybe 3 - 20 children on average.

A smoker polluting the space he/she stands in smoking, can harm many more people. Just the other day I was waiting at the traffic lights to cross the street and some pleb next to me breathed smoke in my direction.

Well I ended up being arrested and cautioned. Not that I care about that BUT I could of been late for work. I had to breathe in this idiots smoke. I live an extremely healthy lifestyle, not obsessive but I do not smoke nor do I drink. I used to have social drinks but with our governments poisoning us and large corporations killing us I dont need to be adding to that myself.



posted on Oct, 20 2011 @ 02:49 PM
link   
reply to post by Six6Six
 


You're basing your assumptions on people you know. I know quite a few smokers that haven't exhibited any of the traits you pulled out of your ass. Aside from being addicted to a substance. Its the same as being an alcoholic, or addicted to any other legal substance.

I guess smokers can take solace in the fact your opinion will never be anything but an opinion. Plus with that mentality, you won't survive anyways.



posted on Oct, 20 2011 @ 02:51 PM
link   
reply to post by Six6Six
 


hhhmmmm....I've never heard of a smoker selling their child for cigarettes. Can you give a link to such a story. Granted, I won't be surprised if its true in this mad crazy world but, I find it very hard to believe someone would choose cigarettes over their child.

If that's the case, they probably shouldn't be reproducing in the first place.


+12 more 
posted on Oct, 20 2011 @ 02:52 PM
link   
reply to post by Six6Six
 



Smokers are weak and often they are considered easily breakable. Plus they smell bad and quite frankly you can never trust a person that needs a drug to operate. I would vote for smokers to be rounded up and be the first in line in the depopulation agenda. Plus they are a drain on the Medical system right along side fat people! I rank smokers along side pedophiles, rapists and religious zealots and obese people!


Let me get this straight, a self proclaimed satanist is warning all of us good people about how evil smokers are.

Oh the irony...



posted on Oct, 20 2011 @ 02:53 PM
link   
reply to post by Rocketman7
 


I never go for that stuff they have right there near the register anyway.
You ever take a marketing course they tell you they put that stuff there for the fools and idiots.
There are people who are so habit prone they will unconsciously just pick up and buy something they really do not want or need and they are a consumer group. They are consumers being controlled by the products.

To the fellow above who claims smart people smoke.
Yes they do and they die. How smart is that?



posted on Oct, 20 2011 @ 02:53 PM
link   

Originally posted by Six6Six

A smoker polluting the space he/she stands in smoking, can harm many more people. Just the other day I was waiting at the traffic lights to cross the street and some pleb next to me breathed smoke in my direction.

Well I ended up being arrested and cautioned. Not that I care about that BUT I could of been late for work. I had to breathe in this idiots smoke. I live an extremely healthy lifestyle, not obsessive but I do not smoke nor do I drink. I used to have social drinks but with our governments poisoning us and large corporations killing us I dont need to be adding to that myself.


Good! You were obviously trying to infringe on someones right to smoke, or just generally being an idiot and harassing someone. That public space is just as much his as it is yours, you can ask him to walk somewhere else, you could walk somewhere else, but if neither happens it doesn't matter what you think.



posted on Oct, 20 2011 @ 02:53 PM
link   

Originally posted by TheInterceptor
reply to post by Six6Six
 


Someone was molested by a smoker apparently. It wasnt your fault!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Just so you know, your kids WILL be smokers one day because of your attitude tword it. Thats how it works. i hope your not spewing this "round them up and kill them" garbage around them.


Your have written a moronic statement here. Obviously you know nothing about anything. My attitude towards smokers is the same as my attitude to rapists and pedophiles. And people like you who say dumb things.

Smokers have contributed to harming more people in the UK than pedophiles and rapists have. Smoking is of no logical use to anyone. But the harm it does to others is tenfold.

Think before you write. And my "round them up and kill them" philosophy is bang on. Is so right it is almost enlightening! Smoker should be socially isolated and made to feel like the small people they are.

Their smoke effects more people that the reach of a pedophile.
edit on 20-10-2011 by Six6Six because: (no reason given)
edit on 20-10-2011 by Six6Six because: (no reason given)



posted on Oct, 20 2011 @ 02:54 PM
link   
I started smoking at the age of 10. 24 years later I was a chainsmoker. So I kind know this stuff. Buy one for stopping smoking. Bought one and no real cigarettes after that. Never even desired one. Dont buy one for SHTF situation. These are electronic devices. Unless you stock up with tools and spareparts these can be bit of a hassle. A normal cigarette doesn't have that. It only needs fire.
edit on 20/10/2011 by PsykoOps because: (no reason given)



posted on Oct, 20 2011 @ 02:54 PM
link   

Originally posted by Frater210
reply to post by Rocketman7
 





But they are hardened, if you carry them in the leatherette charging cigarette case accessory.


All The Way!

Beautiful. How cool is that, that my stash of smokes can be hardened. I am totally down for that. If something did come up the first thing in my pockets that I am going to check for damage are the smokes. It would be nice to know they are smash proof.

Take it easy.



You laugh now, but then you will sleep with the case under your pillow.



posted on Oct, 20 2011 @ 02:54 PM
link   

Originally posted by Six6Six
reply to post by Rocketman7
 


Smokers are weak and often they are considered easily breakable.

Plus they smell bad and quite frankly you can never trust a person that needs a drug to operate.

I would vote for smokers to be rounded up and be the first in line in the depopulation agenda. Plus they are a drain
on the Medical system right along side fat people!

I rank smokers along side pedophiles, rapists and religious zealots and obese people!
edit on 20-10-2011 by Six6Six because: (no reason given)


I love it
Six6Six just called President Obama a pedophile,
rapist,religious zealot idiot!





new topics
 
13
<< 1    3  4  5 >>

log in

join